Cargando…

Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair

BACKGROUND: In our Institute, most of the patients treated for hand injuries were industrial workers with poor compliance. For rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair, we had tried various early mobilization protocols. As these protocols demanded a degree of commitment from the patients, o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geetha, Krishnamurthy, Hariharan, Narayanan Chandramouli, Mohan, Jagannathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987210
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129629
_version_ 1782323307558731776
author Geetha, Krishnamurthy
Hariharan, Narayanan Chandramouli
Mohan, Jagannathan
author_facet Geetha, Krishnamurthy
Hariharan, Narayanan Chandramouli
Mohan, Jagannathan
author_sort Geetha, Krishnamurthy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In our Institute, most of the patients treated for hand injuries were industrial workers with poor compliance. For rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair, we had tried various early mobilization protocols. As these protocols demanded a degree of commitment from the patients, our results were suboptimal. Hence, to improve the results, we implemented a new rehabilitation protocol by administering the pulsed ultrasound therapy during the early phase of tendon healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study done over a period of five years from January 2008 to January 2013. A total of 100 patients and 139 digits with zone II flexor tendon injuries were studied. After randomization, we administered pulsed ultrasound therapy of different frequencies and intensities for a total of 72 patients and 99 digits and formulated three groups. The results of ultrasound treated cases were compared with each other and with the results of cases treated by immobilization protocol. The results were analyzed using ‘Original Strickland’ criteria. RESULTS: 72% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 1) protocol, 75% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 2) protocol, and 77% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 3) protocol were achieved. There was no case of rupture in the first two groups. The rupture rate was 7% in ultrasound (Group 3) protocol. Only 25% excellent-good results were obtained in the immobilization protocol. CONCLUSION: After zone II flexor tendon repair, pulsed ultrasound therapy during the early rehabilitation phase is safe and effective. The results are comparable to early mobilization protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4075224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40752242014-07-01 Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair Geetha, Krishnamurthy Hariharan, Narayanan Chandramouli Mohan, Jagannathan Indian J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: In our Institute, most of the patients treated for hand injuries were industrial workers with poor compliance. For rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair, we had tried various early mobilization protocols. As these protocols demanded a degree of commitment from the patients, our results were suboptimal. Hence, to improve the results, we implemented a new rehabilitation protocol by administering the pulsed ultrasound therapy during the early phase of tendon healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study done over a period of five years from January 2008 to January 2013. A total of 100 patients and 139 digits with zone II flexor tendon injuries were studied. After randomization, we administered pulsed ultrasound therapy of different frequencies and intensities for a total of 72 patients and 99 digits and formulated three groups. The results of ultrasound treated cases were compared with each other and with the results of cases treated by immobilization protocol. The results were analyzed using ‘Original Strickland’ criteria. RESULTS: 72% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 1) protocol, 75% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 2) protocol, and 77% excellent-good results in ultrasound (Group 3) protocol were achieved. There was no case of rupture in the first two groups. The rupture rate was 7% in ultrasound (Group 3) protocol. Only 25% excellent-good results were obtained in the immobilization protocol. CONCLUSION: After zone II flexor tendon repair, pulsed ultrasound therapy during the early rehabilitation phase is safe and effective. The results are comparable to early mobilization protocols. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4075224/ /pubmed/24987210 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129629 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Geetha, Krishnamurthy
Hariharan, Narayanan Chandramouli
Mohan, Jagannathan
Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair
title Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair
title_full Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair
title_fullStr Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair
title_full_unstemmed Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair
title_short Early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone II flexor tendon repair
title_sort early ultrasound therapy for rehabilitation after zone ii flexor tendon repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987210
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129629
work_keys_str_mv AT geethakrishnamurthy earlyultrasoundtherapyforrehabilitationafterzoneiiflexortendonrepair
AT hariharannarayananchandramouli earlyultrasoundtherapyforrehabilitationafterzoneiiflexortendonrepair
AT mohanjagannathan earlyultrasoundtherapyforrehabilitationafterzoneiiflexortendonrepair