Cargando…

Reference values for the incremental shuttle walk test in healthy subjects: from the walk distance to physiological responses ,

OBJECTIVE: To determine reference values for incremental shuttle walk distance (ISWD) and peak physiological responses during the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), as well as to develop a series of predictive equations for those variables in healthy adults. METHODS: We evaluated 103 healthy part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dourado, Victor Zuniga, Guerra, Ricardo Luís Fernandes, Tanni, Suzana Erico, Antunes, Letícia Cláudia de Oliveira, Godoy, Irma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132013000200010
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine reference values for incremental shuttle walk distance (ISWD) and peak physiological responses during the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), as well as to develop a series of predictive equations for those variables in healthy adults. METHODS: We evaluated 103 healthy participants ≥ 40 years of age (54 women and 49 men). We fitted each participant with a gas analysis system for use during the ISWT. Oxygen consumption (VO(2)), carbon dioxide production, minute ventilation, heart rate (HR), ISWD, and maximal walking velocity (MWV) were obtained as primary outcomes. We also assessed hand grip strength (HGS) and lean body mass (LBM). RESULTS: The regression analysis models, including physiological variables, ISWD, and MWV (adjusted for age, body mass, height, and sex), produced R(2) values ranging from 0.40 to 0.65 (for HR and peak VO(2), respectively). Using the models including LBM or HGS, we obtained no significant increase in the R(2) values for predicting peak VO(2), although the use of those models did result in slight increases in the R(2) values for ISWD and MWV (of 8% and 12%, respectively). The variables ISWD, MWV, and ISWD × body mass, respectively, explained 76.7%, 73.3%, and 81.2% of peak VO(2) variability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide reference values for ISWD and physiological responses to the ISWT, which can be properly estimated by determining simple demographic and anthropometric characteristics in healthy adults ≥ 40 years of age. The ISWT could be used in assessing physical fitness in the general adult population and in designing individualized walking programs.