Cargando…

Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra

The Stevens classification of levels of measurement involves four types of scale: “Nominal”, “Ordinal”, “Interval” and “Ratio”. This classification has been used widely in medical fields and has accomplished an important role in composition and interpretation of scale. With this classification, leve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawamura, Jitsuki, Morishita, Shigeru, Ishigooka, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-4-9
_version_ 1782323433696133120
author Sawamura, Jitsuki
Morishita, Shigeru
Ishigooka, Jun
author_facet Sawamura, Jitsuki
Morishita, Shigeru
Ishigooka, Jun
author_sort Sawamura, Jitsuki
collection PubMed
description The Stevens classification of levels of measurement involves four types of scale: “Nominal”, “Ordinal”, “Interval” and “Ratio”. This classification has been used widely in medical fields and has accomplished an important role in composition and interpretation of scale. With this classification, levels of measurements appear organized and validated. However, a group theory-like systematization beckons as an alternative because of its logical consistency and unexceptional applicability in the natural sciences but which may offer great advantages in clinical medicine. According to this viewpoint, the Stevens classification is reformulated within an abstract algebra-like scheme; ‘Abelian modulo additive group’ for “Ordinal scale” accompanied with ‘zero’, ‘Abelian additive group’ for “Interval scale”, and ‘field’ for “Ratio scale”. Furthermore, a vector-like display arranges a mixture of schemes describing the assessment of patient states. With this vector-like notation, data-mining and data-set combination is possible on a higher abstract structure level based upon a hierarchical-cluster form. Using simple examples, we show that operations acting on the corresponding mixed schemes of this display allow for a sophisticated means of classifying, updating, monitoring, and prognosis, where better data mining/data usage and efficacy is expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4075994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40759942014-07-01 Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra Sawamura, Jitsuki Morishita, Shigeru Ishigooka, Jun J Clin Bioinforma Research The Stevens classification of levels of measurement involves four types of scale: “Nominal”, “Ordinal”, “Interval” and “Ratio”. This classification has been used widely in medical fields and has accomplished an important role in composition and interpretation of scale. With this classification, levels of measurements appear organized and validated. However, a group theory-like systematization beckons as an alternative because of its logical consistency and unexceptional applicability in the natural sciences but which may offer great advantages in clinical medicine. According to this viewpoint, the Stevens classification is reformulated within an abstract algebra-like scheme; ‘Abelian modulo additive group’ for “Ordinal scale” accompanied with ‘zero’, ‘Abelian additive group’ for “Interval scale”, and ‘field’ for “Ratio scale”. Furthermore, a vector-like display arranges a mixture of schemes describing the assessment of patient states. With this vector-like notation, data-mining and data-set combination is possible on a higher abstract structure level based upon a hierarchical-cluster form. Using simple examples, we show that operations acting on the corresponding mixed schemes of this display allow for a sophisticated means of classifying, updating, monitoring, and prognosis, where better data mining/data usage and efficacy is expected. BioMed Central 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4075994/ /pubmed/24987515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-4-9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sawamura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sawamura, Jitsuki
Morishita, Shigeru
Ishigooka, Jun
Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
title Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
title_full Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
title_fullStr Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
title_short Interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
title_sort interpretation for scales of measurement linking with abstract algebra
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-4-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sawamurajitsuki interpretationforscalesofmeasurementlinkingwithabstractalgebra
AT morishitashigeru interpretationforscalesofmeasurementlinkingwithabstractalgebra
AT ishigookajun interpretationforscalesofmeasurementlinkingwithabstractalgebra