Cargando…

A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies may potentially assist in screening for chronic conditions such as sleep disorders, which remain both under-diagnosed and untreated. We aimed to compare a subjective risk-assessment-only questionnaire (RAO) for common sleep disorder screening against the same risk-as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuller, Joanne M., Wong, Keith K., Grunstein, Ronald, Krass, Ines, Patel, Jayshree, Saini, Bandana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101003
_version_ 1782323456310771712
author Fuller, Joanne M.
Wong, Keith K.
Grunstein, Ronald
Krass, Ines
Patel, Jayshree
Saini, Bandana
author_facet Fuller, Joanne M.
Wong, Keith K.
Grunstein, Ronald
Krass, Ines
Patel, Jayshree
Saini, Bandana
author_sort Fuller, Joanne M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies may potentially assist in screening for chronic conditions such as sleep disorders, which remain both under-diagnosed and untreated. We aimed to compare a subjective risk-assessment-only questionnaire (RAO) for common sleep disorder screening against the same risk-assessment questionnaire plus a nasal flow monitor as an objective marker of possible underlying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (RA+) in a community pharmacy setting. The primary outcome was the number of participants identified in RAO or RA+ group who were likely to have and consequently be diagnosed with OSA. Further outcomes included the number of participants identified as being at risk for, referred for, taking-up referral for, and then diagnosed with OSA, insomnia, and/or restless legs syndrome (RLS) in either group. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized trial, participants were recruited through 23 community pharmacies. Using validated instruments, 325 (RAO = 152, RA+ = 173) participants were screened for OSA, insomnia, and RLS. FINDINGS: 218 (67%) participants were at risk of OSA, insomnia or RLS and these participants were referred to their primary physician. The proportion of screened participants identified as being at risk of OSA was significantly higher in the RA+ group (36% in RAO vs. 66% in RA+, OR 3.4, 95% CI (1.8–6.5), p<0.001). A 12-month follow-up was completed in 125 RAO and 155 RA+ participants. Actual referral uptake was 34% RAO, 26% RA+, OR 4.4, 95% CI (1.4–19.2), p = 0.31. The OSA diagnosis rate was higher in the RA+ arm (p = 0.01). To yield a single additional confirmed OSA diagnosis, 16 people would need to be screened using the RA+ protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that utilising either screening method is feasible in identifying individuals in the community pharmacy setting who are likely to have OSA, insomnia and/or RLS. Secondly, adding an objective marker of OSA to a questionnaire-based prediction tool resulted in more confirmed OSA diagnoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: : ACTR.org.au ACTRN12608000628347
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4076224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40762242014-07-02 A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial Fuller, Joanne M. Wong, Keith K. Grunstein, Ronald Krass, Ines Patel, Jayshree Saini, Bandana PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies may potentially assist in screening for chronic conditions such as sleep disorders, which remain both under-diagnosed and untreated. We aimed to compare a subjective risk-assessment-only questionnaire (RAO) for common sleep disorder screening against the same risk-assessment questionnaire plus a nasal flow monitor as an objective marker of possible underlying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (RA+) in a community pharmacy setting. The primary outcome was the number of participants identified in RAO or RA+ group who were likely to have and consequently be diagnosed with OSA. Further outcomes included the number of participants identified as being at risk for, referred for, taking-up referral for, and then diagnosed with OSA, insomnia, and/or restless legs syndrome (RLS) in either group. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized trial, participants were recruited through 23 community pharmacies. Using validated instruments, 325 (RAO = 152, RA+ = 173) participants were screened for OSA, insomnia, and RLS. FINDINGS: 218 (67%) participants were at risk of OSA, insomnia or RLS and these participants were referred to their primary physician. The proportion of screened participants identified as being at risk of OSA was significantly higher in the RA+ group (36% in RAO vs. 66% in RA+, OR 3.4, 95% CI (1.8–6.5), p<0.001). A 12-month follow-up was completed in 125 RAO and 155 RA+ participants. Actual referral uptake was 34% RAO, 26% RA+, OR 4.4, 95% CI (1.4–19.2), p = 0.31. The OSA diagnosis rate was higher in the RA+ arm (p = 0.01). To yield a single additional confirmed OSA diagnosis, 16 people would need to be screened using the RA+ protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that utilising either screening method is feasible in identifying individuals in the community pharmacy setting who are likely to have OSA, insomnia and/or RLS. Secondly, adding an objective marker of OSA to a questionnaire-based prediction tool resulted in more confirmed OSA diagnoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: : ACTR.org.au ACTRN12608000628347 Public Library of Science 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4076224/ /pubmed/24978952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101003 Text en © 2014 Fuller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fuller, Joanne M.
Wong, Keith K.
Grunstein, Ronald
Krass, Ines
Patel, Jayshree
Saini, Bandana
A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of screening methods for sleep disorders in australian community pharmacies: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101003
work_keys_str_mv AT fullerjoannem acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wongkeithk acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grunsteinronald acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krassines acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pateljayshree acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sainibandana acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fullerjoannem comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wongkeithk comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grunsteinronald comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krassines comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pateljayshree comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sainibandana comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial