Cargando…
A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies may potentially assist in screening for chronic conditions such as sleep disorders, which remain both under-diagnosed and untreated. We aimed to compare a subjective risk-assessment-only questionnaire (RAO) for common sleep disorder screening against the same risk-as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101003 |
_version_ | 1782323456310771712 |
---|---|
author | Fuller, Joanne M. Wong, Keith K. Grunstein, Ronald Krass, Ines Patel, Jayshree Saini, Bandana |
author_facet | Fuller, Joanne M. Wong, Keith K. Grunstein, Ronald Krass, Ines Patel, Jayshree Saini, Bandana |
author_sort | Fuller, Joanne M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies may potentially assist in screening for chronic conditions such as sleep disorders, which remain both under-diagnosed and untreated. We aimed to compare a subjective risk-assessment-only questionnaire (RAO) for common sleep disorder screening against the same risk-assessment questionnaire plus a nasal flow monitor as an objective marker of possible underlying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (RA+) in a community pharmacy setting. The primary outcome was the number of participants identified in RAO or RA+ group who were likely to have and consequently be diagnosed with OSA. Further outcomes included the number of participants identified as being at risk for, referred for, taking-up referral for, and then diagnosed with OSA, insomnia, and/or restless legs syndrome (RLS) in either group. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized trial, participants were recruited through 23 community pharmacies. Using validated instruments, 325 (RAO = 152, RA+ = 173) participants were screened for OSA, insomnia, and RLS. FINDINGS: 218 (67%) participants were at risk of OSA, insomnia or RLS and these participants were referred to their primary physician. The proportion of screened participants identified as being at risk of OSA was significantly higher in the RA+ group (36% in RAO vs. 66% in RA+, OR 3.4, 95% CI (1.8–6.5), p<0.001). A 12-month follow-up was completed in 125 RAO and 155 RA+ participants. Actual referral uptake was 34% RAO, 26% RA+, OR 4.4, 95% CI (1.4–19.2), p = 0.31. The OSA diagnosis rate was higher in the RA+ arm (p = 0.01). To yield a single additional confirmed OSA diagnosis, 16 people would need to be screened using the RA+ protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that utilising either screening method is feasible in identifying individuals in the community pharmacy setting who are likely to have OSA, insomnia and/or RLS. Secondly, adding an objective marker of OSA to a questionnaire-based prediction tool resulted in more confirmed OSA diagnoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: : ACTR.org.au ACTRN12608000628347 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4076224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40762242014-07-02 A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial Fuller, Joanne M. Wong, Keith K. Grunstein, Ronald Krass, Ines Patel, Jayshree Saini, Bandana PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies may potentially assist in screening for chronic conditions such as sleep disorders, which remain both under-diagnosed and untreated. We aimed to compare a subjective risk-assessment-only questionnaire (RAO) for common sleep disorder screening against the same risk-assessment questionnaire plus a nasal flow monitor as an objective marker of possible underlying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (RA+) in a community pharmacy setting. The primary outcome was the number of participants identified in RAO or RA+ group who were likely to have and consequently be diagnosed with OSA. Further outcomes included the number of participants identified as being at risk for, referred for, taking-up referral for, and then diagnosed with OSA, insomnia, and/or restless legs syndrome (RLS) in either group. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized trial, participants were recruited through 23 community pharmacies. Using validated instruments, 325 (RAO = 152, RA+ = 173) participants were screened for OSA, insomnia, and RLS. FINDINGS: 218 (67%) participants were at risk of OSA, insomnia or RLS and these participants were referred to their primary physician. The proportion of screened participants identified as being at risk of OSA was significantly higher in the RA+ group (36% in RAO vs. 66% in RA+, OR 3.4, 95% CI (1.8–6.5), p<0.001). A 12-month follow-up was completed in 125 RAO and 155 RA+ participants. Actual referral uptake was 34% RAO, 26% RA+, OR 4.4, 95% CI (1.4–19.2), p = 0.31. The OSA diagnosis rate was higher in the RA+ arm (p = 0.01). To yield a single additional confirmed OSA diagnosis, 16 people would need to be screened using the RA+ protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that utilising either screening method is feasible in identifying individuals in the community pharmacy setting who are likely to have OSA, insomnia and/or RLS. Secondly, adding an objective marker of OSA to a questionnaire-based prediction tool resulted in more confirmed OSA diagnoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: : ACTR.org.au ACTRN12608000628347 Public Library of Science 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4076224/ /pubmed/24978952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101003 Text en © 2014 Fuller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fuller, Joanne M. Wong, Keith K. Grunstein, Ronald Krass, Ines Patel, Jayshree Saini, Bandana A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | A Comparison of Screening Methods for Sleep Disorders in Australian Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of screening methods for sleep disorders in australian community pharmacies: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fullerjoannem acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wongkeithk acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grunsteinronald acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krassines acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pateljayshree acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sainibandana acomparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fullerjoannem comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wongkeithk comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grunsteinronald comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krassines comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pateljayshree comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sainibandana comparisonofscreeningmethodsforsleepdisordersinaustraliancommunitypharmaciesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |