Cargando…
A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty newly extracted premolars were bonded to 0.022 SS brackets (Ormco, Scafati, Italy) and equa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892 |
_version_ | 1782323556779032576 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Sudhir Tandon, Pradeep Nagar, Amit Singh, Gyan P Singh, Alka Chugh, Vinay K |
author_facet | Sharma, Sudhir Tandon, Pradeep Nagar, Amit Singh, Gyan P Singh, Alka Chugh, Vinay K |
author_sort | Sharma, Sudhir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty newly extracted premolars were bonded to 0.022 SS brackets (Ormco, Scafati, Italy) and equally divided into four groups based on adhesive used: (1) Rely-a-Bond (self-cure adhesive, Reliance Orthodontic Product, Inc., Illinois, USA), (2) Transbond XT (light-cure adhesive, 3M Unitek, CA, USA), (3) Transbond Plus (sixth generation self-etch primer, 3M Unitek, CA, USA) with Transbond XT (4) Xeno V (seventh generation self-etch primer, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) with Xeno Ortho (light-cure adhesive, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) adhesive. Brackets were debonded with a universal testing machine (Model No. 3382 Instron Corp., Canton, Mass, USA). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recordedIn addition, the conditioned enamel surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Transbond XT (15.49 MPa) attained the highest bond strength. Self-etching adhesives (Xeno V, 13.51 MPa; Transbond Plus, 11.57 MPa) showed clinically acceptable SBS values and almost clean enamel surface after debonding. The analysis of variance (F = 11.85, P < 0.0001) and Chi-square (χ(2) = 18.16, P < 0.05) tests revealed significant differences among groups. The ARI score of 3 (i.e., All adhesives left on the tooth) to be the most prevalent in Transbond XT (40%), followed by Rely-a-Bond (30%), Transbond Plus with Transbond XT (15%), and Xeno V with Xeno Ortho (10%). Under SEM, enamel surfaces after debonding of the brackets appeared porous when an acid-etching process was performed on the surfaces of Rely-a-Bond and Transbond XT, whereas with self-etching primers enamel presented smooth and almost clean surfaces (Transbond Plus and Xeno V group). CONCLUSION: All adhesives yielded SBS values higher than the recommended bond strength (5.9-7–8 MPa), Seventh generation self-etching primer Xeno V with Xeno Ortho showed clinically acceptable SBS and the least amount of residual adhesive left on the enamel surface after debonding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4077105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40771052014-07-01 A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives Sharma, Sudhir Tandon, Pradeep Nagar, Amit Singh, Gyan P Singh, Alka Chugh, Vinay K J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty newly extracted premolars were bonded to 0.022 SS brackets (Ormco, Scafati, Italy) and equally divided into four groups based on adhesive used: (1) Rely-a-Bond (self-cure adhesive, Reliance Orthodontic Product, Inc., Illinois, USA), (2) Transbond XT (light-cure adhesive, 3M Unitek, CA, USA), (3) Transbond Plus (sixth generation self-etch primer, 3M Unitek, CA, USA) with Transbond XT (4) Xeno V (seventh generation self-etch primer, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) with Xeno Ortho (light-cure adhesive, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) adhesive. Brackets were debonded with a universal testing machine (Model No. 3382 Instron Corp., Canton, Mass, USA). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recordedIn addition, the conditioned enamel surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Transbond XT (15.49 MPa) attained the highest bond strength. Self-etching adhesives (Xeno V, 13.51 MPa; Transbond Plus, 11.57 MPa) showed clinically acceptable SBS values and almost clean enamel surface after debonding. The analysis of variance (F = 11.85, P < 0.0001) and Chi-square (χ(2) = 18.16, P < 0.05) tests revealed significant differences among groups. The ARI score of 3 (i.e., All adhesives left on the tooth) to be the most prevalent in Transbond XT (40%), followed by Rely-a-Bond (30%), Transbond Plus with Transbond XT (15%), and Xeno V with Xeno Ortho (10%). Under SEM, enamel surfaces after debonding of the brackets appeared porous when an acid-etching process was performed on the surfaces of Rely-a-Bond and Transbond XT, whereas with self-etching primers enamel presented smooth and almost clean surfaces (Transbond Plus and Xeno V group). CONCLUSION: All adhesives yielded SBS values higher than the recommended bond strength (5.9-7–8 MPa), Seventh generation self-etching primer Xeno V with Xeno Ortho showed clinically acceptable SBS and the least amount of residual adhesive left on the enamel surface after debonding. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4077105/ /pubmed/24987660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Sudhir Tandon, Pradeep Nagar, Amit Singh, Gyan P Singh, Alka Chugh, Vinay K A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
title | A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
title_full | A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
title_fullStr | A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
title_short | A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmasudhir acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT tandonpradeep acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT nagaramit acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT singhgyanp acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT singhalka acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT chughvinayk acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT sharmasudhir comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT tandonpradeep comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT nagaramit comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT singhgyanp comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT singhalka comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives AT chughvinayk comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives |