Cargando…

A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty newly extracted premolars were bonded to 0.022 SS brackets (Ormco, Scafati, Italy) and equa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Sudhir, Tandon, Pradeep, Nagar, Amit, Singh, Gyan P, Singh, Alka, Chugh, Vinay K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987660
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892
_version_ 1782323556779032576
author Sharma, Sudhir
Tandon, Pradeep
Nagar, Amit
Singh, Gyan P
Singh, Alka
Chugh, Vinay K
author_facet Sharma, Sudhir
Tandon, Pradeep
Nagar, Amit
Singh, Gyan P
Singh, Alka
Chugh, Vinay K
author_sort Sharma, Sudhir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty newly extracted premolars were bonded to 0.022 SS brackets (Ormco, Scafati, Italy) and equally divided into four groups based on adhesive used: (1) Rely-a-Bond (self-cure adhesive, Reliance Orthodontic Product, Inc., Illinois, USA), (2) Transbond XT (light-cure adhesive, 3M Unitek, CA, USA), (3) Transbond Plus (sixth generation self-etch primer, 3M Unitek, CA, USA) with Transbond XT (4) Xeno V (seventh generation self-etch primer, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) with Xeno Ortho (light-cure adhesive, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) adhesive. Brackets were debonded with a universal testing machine (Model No. 3382 Instron Corp., Canton, Mass, USA). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recordedIn addition, the conditioned enamel surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Transbond XT (15.49 MPa) attained the highest bond strength. Self-etching adhesives (Xeno V, 13.51 MPa; Transbond Plus, 11.57 MPa) showed clinically acceptable SBS values and almost clean enamel surface after debonding. The analysis of variance (F = 11.85, P < 0.0001) and Chi-square (χ(2) = 18.16, P < 0.05) tests revealed significant differences among groups. The ARI score of 3 (i.e., All adhesives left on the tooth) to be the most prevalent in Transbond XT (40%), followed by Rely-a-Bond (30%), Transbond Plus with Transbond XT (15%), and Xeno V with Xeno Ortho (10%). Under SEM, enamel surfaces after debonding of the brackets appeared porous when an acid-etching process was performed on the surfaces of Rely-a-Bond and Transbond XT, whereas with self-etching primers enamel presented smooth and almost clean surfaces (Transbond Plus and Xeno V group). CONCLUSION: All adhesives yielded SBS values higher than the recommended bond strength (5.9-7–8 MPa), Seventh generation self-etching primer Xeno V with Xeno Ortho showed clinically acceptable SBS and the least amount of residual adhesive left on the enamel surface after debonding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4077105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40771052014-07-01 A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives Sharma, Sudhir Tandon, Pradeep Nagar, Amit Singh, Gyan P Singh, Alka Chugh, Vinay K J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty newly extracted premolars were bonded to 0.022 SS brackets (Ormco, Scafati, Italy) and equally divided into four groups based on adhesive used: (1) Rely-a-Bond (self-cure adhesive, Reliance Orthodontic Product, Inc., Illinois, USA), (2) Transbond XT (light-cure adhesive, 3M Unitek, CA, USA), (3) Transbond Plus (sixth generation self-etch primer, 3M Unitek, CA, USA) with Transbond XT (4) Xeno V (seventh generation self-etch primer, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) with Xeno Ortho (light-cure adhesive, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) adhesive. Brackets were debonded with a universal testing machine (Model No. 3382 Instron Corp., Canton, Mass, USA). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recordedIn addition, the conditioned enamel surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Transbond XT (15.49 MPa) attained the highest bond strength. Self-etching adhesives (Xeno V, 13.51 MPa; Transbond Plus, 11.57 MPa) showed clinically acceptable SBS values and almost clean enamel surface after debonding. The analysis of variance (F = 11.85, P < 0.0001) and Chi-square (χ(2) = 18.16, P < 0.05) tests revealed significant differences among groups. The ARI score of 3 (i.e., All adhesives left on the tooth) to be the most prevalent in Transbond XT (40%), followed by Rely-a-Bond (30%), Transbond Plus with Transbond XT (15%), and Xeno V with Xeno Ortho (10%). Under SEM, enamel surfaces after debonding of the brackets appeared porous when an acid-etching process was performed on the surfaces of Rely-a-Bond and Transbond XT, whereas with self-etching primers enamel presented smooth and almost clean surfaces (Transbond Plus and Xeno V group). CONCLUSION: All adhesives yielded SBS values higher than the recommended bond strength (5.9-7–8 MPa), Seventh generation self-etching primer Xeno V with Xeno Ortho showed clinically acceptable SBS and the least amount of residual adhesive left on the enamel surface after debonding. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4077105/ /pubmed/24987660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Sudhir
Tandon, Pradeep
Nagar, Amit
Singh, Gyan P
Singh, Alka
Chugh, Vinay K
A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
title A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
title_full A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
title_fullStr A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
title_short A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987660
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmasudhir acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT tandonpradeep acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT nagaramit acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT singhgyanp acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT singhalka acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT chughvinayk acomparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT sharmasudhir comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT tandonpradeep comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT nagaramit comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT singhgyanp comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT singhalka comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives
AT chughvinayk comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedwithfourdifferentorthodonticadhesives