Cargando…

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of open peer review as a mechanism to improve the reporting of randomised trials published in biomedical journals. Design Retrospective before and after study. Setting BioMed Central series medical journals. Sample 93 primary reports of randomised trials pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hopewell, Sally, Collins, Gary S, Boutron, Isabelle, Yu, Ly-Mee, Cook, Jonathan, Shanyinde, Milensu, Wharton, Rose, Shamseer, Larissa, Altman, Douglas G
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24986891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4145

Ejemplares similares

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Success in Publishing: Selecting an Appropriate Journal and Braving the Peer-review Process
por: Tullu, MS, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer Reviewing and Electronic Publishing
por: Spigler, R
Publicado: (2002)

Publishing peer review materials
por: Beck, Jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Peer Review in Law Journals
por: Stojanovski, Jadranka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal
por: Busse, Clara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
por: Rombey, Tanja, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles: Primary Results of 2 Randomized Trials
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review(a)
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2018)

Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
por: Cho, Young Gyu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
por: Wicherts, Jelte M.
Publicado: (2016)

Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2014)

Publish and flourish, or the collective wisdom of peer review
por: Roos, Anna Marie
Publicado: (2022)

Peer review in open access scientific journals
por: Falagas, Matthew E
Publicado: (2007)

Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
por: Sprowson, A. P., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
por: Kwee, Thomas C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
por: Hamilton, Daniel G, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting on covariate adjustment in randomised controlled trials before and after revision of the 2001 CONSORT statement: a literature review
por: Yu, Ly-Mee, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
por: Hirst, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
por: Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
por: Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 – Open access, peer-review, and impact factor
por: Shidham, Vinod B, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

SCOAP3: where libraries, scientists and publishers meet repositories, peer-reviewed journals and Open Access
por: Mele, Salvatore
Publicado: (2009)

A lesson learned about predatory journals and their difference from peer-reviewed open-access publishing
por: Murrell, Dedee F.
Publicado: (2016)

Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues
por: Kodvanj, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_0gfjqgo3s1t7hu5jqjq7fah0mt