Cargando…

Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Assisted living (AL) residents are at risk for cognitive and functional declines that eventually reduce their ability to care for themselves, thereby triggering nursing home placement. In developing a method to slow this decline, the efficacy of Reasoning Exercises in Assisted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Kristine, Herman, Ruth, Bontempo, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25028542
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S62095
_version_ 1782323595166351360
author Williams, Kristine
Herman, Ruth
Bontempo, Daniel
author_facet Williams, Kristine
Herman, Ruth
Bontempo, Daniel
author_sort Williams, Kristine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Assisted living (AL) residents are at risk for cognitive and functional declines that eventually reduce their ability to care for themselves, thereby triggering nursing home placement. In developing a method to slow this decline, the efficacy of Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living (REAL), a cognitive training intervention that teaches everyday reasoning and problem-solving skills to AL residents, was tested. DESIGN AND METHODS: At thirteen randomized Midwestern facilities, AL residents whose Mini Mental State Examination scores ranged from 19–29 either were trained in REAL or a vitamin education attention control program or received no treatment at all. For 3 weeks, treated groups received personal training in their respective programs. RESULTS: Scores on the Every Day Problems Test for Cognitively Challenged Elders (EPCCE) and on the Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS) showed significant increases only for the REAL group. For EPCCE, change from baseline immediately postintervention was +3.10 (P<0.01), and there was significant retention at the 3-month follow-up (d=2.71; P<0.01). For DAFS, change from baseline immediately postintervention was +3.52 (P<0.001), although retention was not as strong. Neither the attention nor the no-treatment control groups had significant gains immediately postintervention or at follow-up assessments. Post hoc across-group comparison of baseline change also highlights the benefits of REAL training. For EPCCE, the magnitude of gain was significantly larger in the REAL group versus the no-treatment control group immediately postintervention (d=3.82; P<0.01) and at the 3-month follow-up (d=3.80; P<0.01). For DAFS, gain magnitude immediately postintervention for REAL was significantly greater compared with in the attention control group (d=4.73; P<0.01). IMPLICATIONS: REAL improves skills in everyday problem solving, which may allow AL residents to maintain self-care and extend AL residency. This benefit is particularly important given the growing population of AL residents at risk for cognitive and self-care decline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4077388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40773882014-07-15 Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving Williams, Kristine Herman, Ruth Bontempo, Daniel Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Assisted living (AL) residents are at risk for cognitive and functional declines that eventually reduce their ability to care for themselves, thereby triggering nursing home placement. In developing a method to slow this decline, the efficacy of Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living (REAL), a cognitive training intervention that teaches everyday reasoning and problem-solving skills to AL residents, was tested. DESIGN AND METHODS: At thirteen randomized Midwestern facilities, AL residents whose Mini Mental State Examination scores ranged from 19–29 either were trained in REAL or a vitamin education attention control program or received no treatment at all. For 3 weeks, treated groups received personal training in their respective programs. RESULTS: Scores on the Every Day Problems Test for Cognitively Challenged Elders (EPCCE) and on the Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS) showed significant increases only for the REAL group. For EPCCE, change from baseline immediately postintervention was +3.10 (P<0.01), and there was significant retention at the 3-month follow-up (d=2.71; P<0.01). For DAFS, change from baseline immediately postintervention was +3.52 (P<0.001), although retention was not as strong. Neither the attention nor the no-treatment control groups had significant gains immediately postintervention or at follow-up assessments. Post hoc across-group comparison of baseline change also highlights the benefits of REAL training. For EPCCE, the magnitude of gain was significantly larger in the REAL group versus the no-treatment control group immediately postintervention (d=3.82; P<0.01) and at the 3-month follow-up (d=3.80; P<0.01). For DAFS, gain magnitude immediately postintervention for REAL was significantly greater compared with in the attention control group (d=4.73; P<0.01). IMPLICATIONS: REAL improves skills in everyday problem solving, which may allow AL residents to maintain self-care and extend AL residency. This benefit is particularly important given the growing population of AL residents at risk for cognitive and self-care decline. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4077388/ /pubmed/25028542 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S62095 Text en © 2014 Williams et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Williams, Kristine
Herman, Ruth
Bontempo, Daniel
Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
title Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
title_full Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
title_fullStr Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
title_full_unstemmed Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
title_short Reasoning Exercises in Assisted Living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
title_sort reasoning exercises in assisted living: a cluster randomized trial to improve reasoning and everyday problem solving
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25028542
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S62095
work_keys_str_mv AT williamskristine reasoningexercisesinassistedlivingaclusterrandomizedtrialtoimprovereasoningandeverydayproblemsolving
AT hermanruth reasoningexercisesinassistedlivingaclusterrandomizedtrialtoimprovereasoningandeverydayproblemsolving
AT bontempodaniel reasoningexercisesinassistedlivingaclusterrandomizedtrialtoimprovereasoningandeverydayproblemsolving