Cargando…

Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?

BACKGROUND: Investigate the impact of the reduction of the number of target lesions on immune-related response assessment in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. METHOD: Ninety patients (53 males, 37 females; age range: 25–87) with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab in two clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishino, Mizuki, Gargano, Maria, Suda, Margaret, Ramaiya, Nikhil H, Hodi, F Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-2-17
_version_ 1782323611711832064
author Nishino, Mizuki
Gargano, Maria
Suda, Margaret
Ramaiya, Nikhil H
Hodi, F Stephen
author_facet Nishino, Mizuki
Gargano, Maria
Suda, Margaret
Ramaiya, Nikhil H
Hodi, F Stephen
author_sort Nishino, Mizuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Investigate the impact of the reduction of the number of target lesions on immune-related response assessment in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. METHOD: Ninety patients (53 males, 37 females; age range: 25–87) with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab in two clinical trials were studied. Tumor measurements during trial allowing up to 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total were retrospectively reviewed. A second set of tumor measurements allowing up to 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total was generated. Immune-related response assessments by two measurements were compared. RESULTS: The number of target lesions was significantly reduced when up to 2 per organ and 5 in total lesions were allowed (Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). The immune-related response assessment using reduced number of lesions was highly concordant with assessment using the original number of lesions (Spearman r for the percent change on 1(st)-3(rd) follow-up: 0.860-0.970; κ(w) for best immune-related response: 0.908). Median time-to-progression was 26.9 months (95%CI: 9.1-∞) by both assessments. Interobserver agreement of measurements was high for both assessments, with the concordance correlation coefficient above 0.98. CONCLUSION: Reduction of the number of target lesions did not significantly affect immune-related response assessment or the measurement variability in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Using up to 2 per organ and 5 in total target lesions is proposed to assess immune-related response, while it is important to keep other novel features of immune-related response criteria such as confirmation of progression and inclusion of new lesion measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4077549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40775492014-07-02 Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab? Nishino, Mizuki Gargano, Maria Suda, Margaret Ramaiya, Nikhil H Hodi, F Stephen J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Investigate the impact of the reduction of the number of target lesions on immune-related response assessment in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. METHOD: Ninety patients (53 males, 37 females; age range: 25–87) with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab in two clinical trials were studied. Tumor measurements during trial allowing up to 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total were retrospectively reviewed. A second set of tumor measurements allowing up to 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total was generated. Immune-related response assessments by two measurements were compared. RESULTS: The number of target lesions was significantly reduced when up to 2 per organ and 5 in total lesions were allowed (Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). The immune-related response assessment using reduced number of lesions was highly concordant with assessment using the original number of lesions (Spearman r for the percent change on 1(st)-3(rd) follow-up: 0.860-0.970; κ(w) for best immune-related response: 0.908). Median time-to-progression was 26.9 months (95%CI: 9.1-∞) by both assessments. Interobserver agreement of measurements was high for both assessments, with the concordance correlation coefficient above 0.98. CONCLUSION: Reduction of the number of target lesions did not significantly affect immune-related response assessment or the measurement variability in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Using up to 2 per organ and 5 in total target lesions is proposed to assess immune-related response, while it is important to keep other novel features of immune-related response criteria such as confirmation of progression and inclusion of new lesion measurements. BioMed Central 2014-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4077549/ /pubmed/24991412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-2-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nishino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nishino, Mizuki
Gargano, Maria
Suda, Margaret
Ramaiya, Nikhil H
Hodi, F Stephen
Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
title Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
title_full Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
title_fullStr Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
title_short Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
title_sort optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-2-17
work_keys_str_mv AT nishinomizuki optimizingimmunerelatedtumorresponseassessmentdoesreducingthenumberoflesionsimpactresponseassessmentinmelanomapatientstreatedwithipilimumab
AT garganomaria optimizingimmunerelatedtumorresponseassessmentdoesreducingthenumberoflesionsimpactresponseassessmentinmelanomapatientstreatedwithipilimumab
AT sudamargaret optimizingimmunerelatedtumorresponseassessmentdoesreducingthenumberoflesionsimpactresponseassessmentinmelanomapatientstreatedwithipilimumab
AT ramaiyanikhilh optimizingimmunerelatedtumorresponseassessmentdoesreducingthenumberoflesionsimpactresponseassessmentinmelanomapatientstreatedwithipilimumab
AT hodifstephen optimizingimmunerelatedtumorresponseassessmentdoesreducingthenumberoflesionsimpactresponseassessmentinmelanomapatientstreatedwithipilimumab