Cargando…
Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
INTRODUCTION: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor are uncommon anomalies and are associated with further malformations. Solitary median maxillary central incisor itself has initially no impact on a child’s health, but congenital nasal pyriform ap...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-215 |
_version_ | 1782323613977804800 |
---|---|
author | Günther, Lutz Sari-Rieger, Aynur Jablonka, Karsten Rustemeyer, Jan |
author_facet | Günther, Lutz Sari-Rieger, Aynur Jablonka, Karsten Rustemeyer, Jan |
author_sort | Günther, Lutz |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor are uncommon anomalies and are associated with further malformations. Solitary median maxillary central incisor itself has initially no impact on a child’s health, but congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis is a potentially life-threatening condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A Caucasian baby boy showed severe dyspnoea and was intubated orotracheally. Multiple anomalies were detected, including urogenital and craniofacial malformations. Computed tomography scans revealed congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis with a diameter of 4.9mm and a solitary median maxillary central incisor. A 3.0mm tube was inserted in his left nasal cavity, and the baby was able to breathe sufficiently and spontaneously. The nasal tube was removed after seven days, and the baby was discharged under application of decongestant drops. After seven months, the baby was readmitted with respiratory distress, and surgery was carried out using an intraoral sublabial approach. The stenotic area of the pyriform aperture was widened, and 3.0mm tubes were inserted in both nasal cavities for 10 days. Over a period of six months, no further respiratory distress has occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to perform surgery was delayed since the baby’s nasal breathing was adequate as a result of the insertion of a nasal tube. Since treatment depends on the severity of symptoms, it is appropriate in some cases to take a conservative approach at first, and to keep surgery as a last resort. Once a conservative approach has been selected for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis, awareness of the life-threatening nature of the condition should be kept in mind, and a surgical approach must still be taken into account. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4077559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40775592014-07-02 Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report Günther, Lutz Sari-Rieger, Aynur Jablonka, Karsten Rustemeyer, Jan J Med Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor are uncommon anomalies and are associated with further malformations. Solitary median maxillary central incisor itself has initially no impact on a child’s health, but congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis is a potentially life-threatening condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A Caucasian baby boy showed severe dyspnoea and was intubated orotracheally. Multiple anomalies were detected, including urogenital and craniofacial malformations. Computed tomography scans revealed congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis with a diameter of 4.9mm and a solitary median maxillary central incisor. A 3.0mm tube was inserted in his left nasal cavity, and the baby was able to breathe sufficiently and spontaneously. The nasal tube was removed after seven days, and the baby was discharged under application of decongestant drops. After seven months, the baby was readmitted with respiratory distress, and surgery was carried out using an intraoral sublabial approach. The stenotic area of the pyriform aperture was widened, and 3.0mm tubes were inserted in both nasal cavities for 10 days. Over a period of six months, no further respiratory distress has occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to perform surgery was delayed since the baby’s nasal breathing was adequate as a result of the insertion of a nasal tube. Since treatment depends on the severity of symptoms, it is appropriate in some cases to take a conservative approach at first, and to keep surgery as a last resort. Once a conservative approach has been selected for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis, awareness of the life-threatening nature of the condition should be kept in mind, and a surgical approach must still be taken into account. BioMed Central 2014-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4077559/ /pubmed/24950703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-215 Text en Copyright © 2014 Günther et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Günther, Lutz Sari-Rieger, Aynur Jablonka, Karsten Rustemeyer, Jan Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
title | Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
title_full | Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
title_fullStr | Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
title_short | Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
title_sort | clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guntherlutz clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport AT saririegeraynur clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport AT jablonkakarsten clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport AT rustemeyerjan clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport |