Cargando…

Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report

INTRODUCTION: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor are uncommon anomalies and are associated with further malformations. Solitary median maxillary central incisor itself has initially no impact on a child’s health, but congenital nasal pyriform ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günther, Lutz, Sari-Rieger, Aynur, Jablonka, Karsten, Rustemeyer, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-215
_version_ 1782323613977804800
author Günther, Lutz
Sari-Rieger, Aynur
Jablonka, Karsten
Rustemeyer, Jan
author_facet Günther, Lutz
Sari-Rieger, Aynur
Jablonka, Karsten
Rustemeyer, Jan
author_sort Günther, Lutz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor are uncommon anomalies and are associated with further malformations. Solitary median maxillary central incisor itself has initially no impact on a child’s health, but congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis is a potentially life-threatening condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A Caucasian baby boy showed severe dyspnoea and was intubated orotracheally. Multiple anomalies were detected, including urogenital and craniofacial malformations. Computed tomography scans revealed congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis with a diameter of 4.9mm and a solitary median maxillary central incisor. A 3.0mm tube was inserted in his left nasal cavity, and the baby was able to breathe sufficiently and spontaneously. The nasal tube was removed after seven days, and the baby was discharged under application of decongestant drops. After seven months, the baby was readmitted with respiratory distress, and surgery was carried out using an intraoral sublabial approach. The stenotic area of the pyriform aperture was widened, and 3.0mm tubes were inserted in both nasal cavities for 10 days. Over a period of six months, no further respiratory distress has occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to perform surgery was delayed since the baby’s nasal breathing was adequate as a result of the insertion of a nasal tube. Since treatment depends on the severity of symptoms, it is appropriate in some cases to take a conservative approach at first, and to keep surgery as a last resort. Once a conservative approach has been selected for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis, awareness of the life-threatening nature of the condition should be kept in mind, and a surgical approach must still be taken into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4077559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40775592014-07-02 Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report Günther, Lutz Sari-Rieger, Aynur Jablonka, Karsten Rustemeyer, Jan J Med Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor are uncommon anomalies and are associated with further malformations. Solitary median maxillary central incisor itself has initially no impact on a child’s health, but congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis is a potentially life-threatening condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A Caucasian baby boy showed severe dyspnoea and was intubated orotracheally. Multiple anomalies were detected, including urogenital and craniofacial malformations. Computed tomography scans revealed congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis with a diameter of 4.9mm and a solitary median maxillary central incisor. A 3.0mm tube was inserted in his left nasal cavity, and the baby was able to breathe sufficiently and spontaneously. The nasal tube was removed after seven days, and the baby was discharged under application of decongestant drops. After seven months, the baby was readmitted with respiratory distress, and surgery was carried out using an intraoral sublabial approach. The stenotic area of the pyriform aperture was widened, and 3.0mm tubes were inserted in both nasal cavities for 10 days. Over a period of six months, no further respiratory distress has occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to perform surgery was delayed since the baby’s nasal breathing was adequate as a result of the insertion of a nasal tube. Since treatment depends on the severity of symptoms, it is appropriate in some cases to take a conservative approach at first, and to keep surgery as a last resort. Once a conservative approach has been selected for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis, awareness of the life-threatening nature of the condition should be kept in mind, and a surgical approach must still be taken into account. BioMed Central 2014-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4077559/ /pubmed/24950703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-215 Text en Copyright © 2014 Günther et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Günther, Lutz
Sari-Rieger, Aynur
Jablonka, Karsten
Rustemeyer, Jan
Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
title Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
title_full Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
title_fullStr Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
title_short Clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
title_sort clinical course and implications of congenital nasal pyriform stenosis and solitary median maxillary central incisor in a newborn: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-215
work_keys_str_mv AT guntherlutz clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport
AT saririegeraynur clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport
AT jablonkakarsten clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport
AT rustemeyerjan clinicalcourseandimplicationsofcongenitalnasalpyriformstenosisandsolitarymedianmaxillarycentralincisorinanewbornacasereport