Cargando…

An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance

Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, David Philip Arthur, Varnon, Christopher A., Sokolowski, Michel B. C., Wells, Harrington, Abramson, Charles I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24983960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101262
_version_ 1782323652662919168
author Craig, David Philip Arthur
Varnon, Christopher A.
Sokolowski, Michel B. C.
Wells, Harrington
Abramson, Charles I.
author_facet Craig, David Philip Arthur
Varnon, Christopher A.
Sokolowski, Michel B. C.
Wells, Harrington
Abramson, Charles I.
author_sort Craig, David Philip Arthur
collection PubMed
description Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) as a model for timing behaviors. Subjects were trained to enter a hole in an automated artificial flower to receive a nectar reinforcer (i.e. reward). Responses were continuously reinforced prior to exposure to either a fixed interval (FI) 15-sec, FI 30-sec, FI 60-sec, or FI 120-sec reinforcement schedule. We measured response rate and post-reinforcement pause within each fixed interval trial between reinforcers. Honey bees responded at higher frequencies earlier in the fixed interval suggesting subject responding did not come under traditional forms of temporal control. Response rates were lower during FI conditions compared to performance on continuous reinforcement schedules, and responding was more resistant to extinction when previously reinforced on FI schedules. However, no “scalloped” or “break-and-run” patterns of group or individual responses reinforced on FI schedules were observed; no traditional evidence of temporal control was found. Finally, longer FI schedules eventually caused all subjects to cease returning to the operant chamber indicating subjects did not tolerate the longer FI schedules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4077790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40777902014-07-03 An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance Craig, David Philip Arthur Varnon, Christopher A. Sokolowski, Michel B. C. Wells, Harrington Abramson, Charles I. PLoS One Research Article Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) as a model for timing behaviors. Subjects were trained to enter a hole in an automated artificial flower to receive a nectar reinforcer (i.e. reward). Responses were continuously reinforced prior to exposure to either a fixed interval (FI) 15-sec, FI 30-sec, FI 60-sec, or FI 120-sec reinforcement schedule. We measured response rate and post-reinforcement pause within each fixed interval trial between reinforcers. Honey bees responded at higher frequencies earlier in the fixed interval suggesting subject responding did not come under traditional forms of temporal control. Response rates were lower during FI conditions compared to performance on continuous reinforcement schedules, and responding was more resistant to extinction when previously reinforced on FI schedules. However, no “scalloped” or “break-and-run” patterns of group or individual responses reinforced on FI schedules were observed; no traditional evidence of temporal control was found. Finally, longer FI schedules eventually caused all subjects to cease returning to the operant chamber indicating subjects did not tolerate the longer FI schedules. Public Library of Science 2014-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4077790/ /pubmed/24983960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101262 Text en © 2014 Craig et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Craig, David Philip Arthur
Varnon, Christopher A.
Sokolowski, Michel B. C.
Wells, Harrington
Abramson, Charles I.
An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance
title An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance
title_full An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance
title_fullStr An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance
title_short An Assessment of Fixed Interval Timing in Free-Flying Honey Bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): An Analysis of Individual Performance
title_sort assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24983960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101262
work_keys_str_mv AT craigdavidphiliparthur anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT varnonchristophera anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT sokolowskimichelbc anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT wellsharrington anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT abramsoncharlesi anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT craigdavidphiliparthur assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT varnonchristophera assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT sokolowskimichelbc assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT wellsharrington assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT abramsoncharlesi assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance