Cargando…

Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention

Weight losses in lifestyle interventions are variable, yet prediction of long-term success is difficult. OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of using various weight loss thresholds in the first 2 months of treatment for predicting 1-year outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants included 2327 adults...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unick, Jessica L., Hogan, Patricia E., Neiberg, Rebecca H., Cheskin, Lawrence J., Dutton, Gareth R., Evans-Hudnall, Gina, Jeffery, Robert, Kitabchi, Abbas E., Nelson, Julie A., Pi-Sunyer, F. Xavier, West, Delia Smith, Wing, Rena R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20777
_version_ 1782323673161531392
author Unick, Jessica L.
Hogan, Patricia E.
Neiberg, Rebecca H.
Cheskin, Lawrence J.
Dutton, Gareth R.
Evans-Hudnall, Gina
Jeffery, Robert
Kitabchi, Abbas E.
Nelson, Julie A.
Pi-Sunyer, F. Xavier
West, Delia Smith
Wing, Rena R.
author_facet Unick, Jessica L.
Hogan, Patricia E.
Neiberg, Rebecca H.
Cheskin, Lawrence J.
Dutton, Gareth R.
Evans-Hudnall, Gina
Jeffery, Robert
Kitabchi, Abbas E.
Nelson, Julie A.
Pi-Sunyer, F. Xavier
West, Delia Smith
Wing, Rena R.
author_sort Unick, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description Weight losses in lifestyle interventions are variable, yet prediction of long-term success is difficult. OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of using various weight loss thresholds in the first 2 months of treatment for predicting 1-year outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants included 2327 adults with type 2 diabetes (BMI:35.8±6.0) randomized to the intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) of the Look AHEAD trial. ILI included weekly behavioral sessions designed to increase physical activity and reduce caloric intake. 1-month, 2-month, and 1-year weight changes were calculated. RESULTS: Participants failing to achieve a ≥2% weight loss at Month 1 were 5.6 (95% CI:4.5,7.0) times more likely to also not achieve a ≥10% weight loss at Year 1, compared to those losing ≥2% initially. These odds were increased to 11.6 (95% CI:8.6,15.6) when using a 3% weight loss threshold at Month 2. Only 15.2% and 8.2% of individuals failing to achieve the ≥2% and ≥3% thresholds at Months 1 and 2 respectively, go on to achieve a ≥10% weight loss at Year 1. CONCLUSIONS: Given the association between initial and 1-year weight loss, the first few months of treatment may be an opportune time to identify those who are unsuccessful and utilize rescue efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4077939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40779392015-01-01 Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention Unick, Jessica L. Hogan, Patricia E. Neiberg, Rebecca H. Cheskin, Lawrence J. Dutton, Gareth R. Evans-Hudnall, Gina Jeffery, Robert Kitabchi, Abbas E. Nelson, Julie A. Pi-Sunyer, F. Xavier West, Delia Smith Wing, Rena R. Obesity (Silver Spring) Article Weight losses in lifestyle interventions are variable, yet prediction of long-term success is difficult. OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of using various weight loss thresholds in the first 2 months of treatment for predicting 1-year outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants included 2327 adults with type 2 diabetes (BMI:35.8±6.0) randomized to the intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) of the Look AHEAD trial. ILI included weekly behavioral sessions designed to increase physical activity and reduce caloric intake. 1-month, 2-month, and 1-year weight changes were calculated. RESULTS: Participants failing to achieve a ≥2% weight loss at Month 1 were 5.6 (95% CI:4.5,7.0) times more likely to also not achieve a ≥10% weight loss at Year 1, compared to those losing ≥2% initially. These odds were increased to 11.6 (95% CI:8.6,15.6) when using a 3% weight loss threshold at Month 2. Only 15.2% and 8.2% of individuals failing to achieve the ≥2% and ≥3% thresholds at Months 1 and 2 respectively, go on to achieve a ≥10% weight loss at Year 1. CONCLUSIONS: Given the association between initial and 1-year weight loss, the first few months of treatment may be an opportune time to identify those who are unsuccessful and utilize rescue efforts. 2014-04-28 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4077939/ /pubmed/24771618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20777 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Unick, Jessica L.
Hogan, Patricia E.
Neiberg, Rebecca H.
Cheskin, Lawrence J.
Dutton, Gareth R.
Evans-Hudnall, Gina
Jeffery, Robert
Kitabchi, Abbas E.
Nelson, Julie A.
Pi-Sunyer, F. Xavier
West, Delia Smith
Wing, Rena R.
Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
title Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
title_full Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
title_fullStr Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
title_short Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
title_sort evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying non-responders to an intensive lifestyle intervention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20777
work_keys_str_mv AT unickjessical evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT hoganpatriciae evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT neibergrebeccah evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT cheskinlawrencej evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT duttongarethr evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT evanshudnallgina evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT jefferyrobert evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT kitabchiabbase evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT nelsonjuliea evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT pisunyerfxavier evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT westdeliasmith evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT wingrenar evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention
AT evaluationofearlyweightlossthresholdsforidentifyingnonresponderstoanintensivelifestyleintervention