Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trinka, Eugen, Höfler, Julia, Zerbs, Alexander, Brigo, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24806973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0167-1
_version_ 1782323702574088192
author Trinka, Eugen
Höfler, Julia
Zerbs, Alexander
Brigo, Francesco
author_facet Trinka, Eugen
Höfler, Julia
Zerbs, Alexander
Brigo, Francesco
author_sort Trinka, Eugen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been used extensively in various forms of status epilepticus (SE). AIM: Our aim was to present a systematic review of data from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous VPA for the treatment of SE. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, back tracing of references in pertinent studies, and contact with the manufacturer of VPA (Sanofi-Aventis). RESULTS: Overall, the search strategy yielded 433 results (425 MEDLINE, seven congress abstracts, one unpublished study); after excluding duplicate publications and case reports, 30 studies were identified (the earliest was published in 1993, the most recent in 2012); ten were controlled (six randomized controlled trials, four non-randomized controlled studies), and 20 uncontrolled trials (eight prospective observational studies, 12 retrospective case series). The cumulative literature describes the experiences of 860 patients with various forms of SE treated with intravenous VPA. The overall response rate to abrogate SE was 70.9 % (601/848; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 67.8–73.9). Response rates to intravenous VPA were better in children than in adults and did not differ between the SE types. The most commonly reported effective doses were between 15 and 45 mg/kg in bolus (6 mg/kg/min) followed by 1–3 mg/kg/h infusion. Safety studies of intravenous VPA administration in patients with SE showed a low incidence of adverse events overall (<10 %), mainly dizziness, thrombocytopenia, and mild hypotension, which was independent of infusion rates. Of note, good cardiovascular and respiratory tolerability was observed in these studies, even at high doses and fast infusion rates (up to 30 mg/kg at 10 mg/kg/min), despite multiple morbidities or other antiepileptic drugs. The most serious concern relates to the possibility of acute encephalopathy, sometimes related to hepatic abnormalities or hyperammonemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published experience is consistent with VPA being a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with established SE who have previously failed conventional first-line treatment with benzodiazepines, but high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform clinicians on its comparative effectiveness in SE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4078236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40782362014-07-25 Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review Trinka, Eugen Höfler, Julia Zerbs, Alexander Brigo, Francesco CNS Drugs Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been used extensively in various forms of status epilepticus (SE). AIM: Our aim was to present a systematic review of data from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous VPA for the treatment of SE. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, back tracing of references in pertinent studies, and contact with the manufacturer of VPA (Sanofi-Aventis). RESULTS: Overall, the search strategy yielded 433 results (425 MEDLINE, seven congress abstracts, one unpublished study); after excluding duplicate publications and case reports, 30 studies were identified (the earliest was published in 1993, the most recent in 2012); ten were controlled (six randomized controlled trials, four non-randomized controlled studies), and 20 uncontrolled trials (eight prospective observational studies, 12 retrospective case series). The cumulative literature describes the experiences of 860 patients with various forms of SE treated with intravenous VPA. The overall response rate to abrogate SE was 70.9 % (601/848; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 67.8–73.9). Response rates to intravenous VPA were better in children than in adults and did not differ between the SE types. The most commonly reported effective doses were between 15 and 45 mg/kg in bolus (6 mg/kg/min) followed by 1–3 mg/kg/h infusion. Safety studies of intravenous VPA administration in patients with SE showed a low incidence of adverse events overall (<10 %), mainly dizziness, thrombocytopenia, and mild hypotension, which was independent of infusion rates. Of note, good cardiovascular and respiratory tolerability was observed in these studies, even at high doses and fast infusion rates (up to 30 mg/kg at 10 mg/kg/min), despite multiple morbidities or other antiepileptic drugs. The most serious concern relates to the possibility of acute encephalopathy, sometimes related to hepatic abnormalities or hyperammonemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published experience is consistent with VPA being a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with established SE who have previously failed conventional first-line treatment with benzodiazepines, but high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform clinicians on its comparative effectiveness in SE. Springer International Publishing 2014-05-08 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4078236/ /pubmed/24806973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0167-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Trinka, Eugen
Höfler, Julia
Zerbs, Alexander
Brigo, Francesco
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
title Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy and safety of intravenous valproate for status epilepticus: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24806973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0167-1
work_keys_str_mv AT trinkaeugen efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview
AT hoflerjulia efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview
AT zerbsalexander efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview
AT brigofrancesco efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview