Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24806973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0167-1 |
_version_ | 1782323702574088192 |
---|---|
author | Trinka, Eugen Höfler, Julia Zerbs, Alexander Brigo, Francesco |
author_facet | Trinka, Eugen Höfler, Julia Zerbs, Alexander Brigo, Francesco |
author_sort | Trinka, Eugen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been used extensively in various forms of status epilepticus (SE). AIM: Our aim was to present a systematic review of data from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous VPA for the treatment of SE. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, back tracing of references in pertinent studies, and contact with the manufacturer of VPA (Sanofi-Aventis). RESULTS: Overall, the search strategy yielded 433 results (425 MEDLINE, seven congress abstracts, one unpublished study); after excluding duplicate publications and case reports, 30 studies were identified (the earliest was published in 1993, the most recent in 2012); ten were controlled (six randomized controlled trials, four non-randomized controlled studies), and 20 uncontrolled trials (eight prospective observational studies, 12 retrospective case series). The cumulative literature describes the experiences of 860 patients with various forms of SE treated with intravenous VPA. The overall response rate to abrogate SE was 70.9 % (601/848; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 67.8–73.9). Response rates to intravenous VPA were better in children than in adults and did not differ between the SE types. The most commonly reported effective doses were between 15 and 45 mg/kg in bolus (6 mg/kg/min) followed by 1–3 mg/kg/h infusion. Safety studies of intravenous VPA administration in patients with SE showed a low incidence of adverse events overall (<10 %), mainly dizziness, thrombocytopenia, and mild hypotension, which was independent of infusion rates. Of note, good cardiovascular and respiratory tolerability was observed in these studies, even at high doses and fast infusion rates (up to 30 mg/kg at 10 mg/kg/min), despite multiple morbidities or other antiepileptic drugs. The most serious concern relates to the possibility of acute encephalopathy, sometimes related to hepatic abnormalities or hyperammonemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published experience is consistent with VPA being a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with established SE who have previously failed conventional first-line treatment with benzodiazepines, but high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform clinicians on its comparative effectiveness in SE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4078236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40782362014-07-25 Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review Trinka, Eugen Höfler, Julia Zerbs, Alexander Brigo, Francesco CNS Drugs Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been used extensively in various forms of status epilepticus (SE). AIM: Our aim was to present a systematic review of data from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous VPA for the treatment of SE. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, back tracing of references in pertinent studies, and contact with the manufacturer of VPA (Sanofi-Aventis). RESULTS: Overall, the search strategy yielded 433 results (425 MEDLINE, seven congress abstracts, one unpublished study); after excluding duplicate publications and case reports, 30 studies were identified (the earliest was published in 1993, the most recent in 2012); ten were controlled (six randomized controlled trials, four non-randomized controlled studies), and 20 uncontrolled trials (eight prospective observational studies, 12 retrospective case series). The cumulative literature describes the experiences of 860 patients with various forms of SE treated with intravenous VPA. The overall response rate to abrogate SE was 70.9 % (601/848; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 67.8–73.9). Response rates to intravenous VPA were better in children than in adults and did not differ between the SE types. The most commonly reported effective doses were between 15 and 45 mg/kg in bolus (6 mg/kg/min) followed by 1–3 mg/kg/h infusion. Safety studies of intravenous VPA administration in patients with SE showed a low incidence of adverse events overall (<10 %), mainly dizziness, thrombocytopenia, and mild hypotension, which was independent of infusion rates. Of note, good cardiovascular and respiratory tolerability was observed in these studies, even at high doses and fast infusion rates (up to 30 mg/kg at 10 mg/kg/min), despite multiple morbidities or other antiepileptic drugs. The most serious concern relates to the possibility of acute encephalopathy, sometimes related to hepatic abnormalities or hyperammonemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published experience is consistent with VPA being a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with established SE who have previously failed conventional first-line treatment with benzodiazepines, but high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform clinicians on its comparative effectiveness in SE. Springer International Publishing 2014-05-08 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4078236/ /pubmed/24806973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0167-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Trinka, Eugen Höfler, Julia Zerbs, Alexander Brigo, Francesco Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Valproate for Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of intravenous valproate for status epilepticus: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24806973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0167-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trinkaeugen efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT hoflerjulia efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT zerbsalexander efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT brigofrancesco efficacyandsafetyofintravenousvalproateforstatusepilepticusasystematicreview |