Cargando…

Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa

BACKGROUND: The tobacco industry claims that illicit trade in cigarettes has increased sharply since the 1990s and that government has lost substantial tax revenue. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine whether cigarette excise tax revenue has been below budget in recent years, compared with previous decades...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: van Walbeek, Corné
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051178
_version_ 1782323786101555200
author van Walbeek, Corné
author_facet van Walbeek, Corné
author_sort van Walbeek, Corné
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The tobacco industry claims that illicit trade in cigarettes has increased sharply since the 1990s and that government has lost substantial tax revenue. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine whether cigarette excise tax revenue has been below budget in recent years, compared with previous decades. (2) To determine trends in the size of the illicit market since 1995. METHODS: For (1), mean percentage errors and root mean square percentage errors were calculated for budget revenue deviation for three products (cigarettes, beer and spirits), for various subperiods. For (2), predicted changes in total consumption, using actual cigarette price and GDP changes and previously published price and income elasticity estimates, were calculated and compared with changes in tax-paid consumption. RESULTS: Cigarette excise revenues were 0.7% below budget for 2000–2012 on average, compared with 3.0% below budget for beer and 4.7% below budget for spirits. There is no evidence that illicit trade in cigarettes in South Africa increased between 2002 and 2009. There is a substantial increase in illicit trade in 2010, probably peaking in 2011. In 2012 tax-paid consumption of cigarettes increased 2.6%, implying that the illicit market share decreased an estimated 0.6 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS: Other than in 2010, there is no evidence that illicit trade is significantly undermining government revenue. Claims that illicit trade has consistently increased over the past 15 years, and has continued its sharp increase since 2010, are not supported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4078715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40787152014-07-10 Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa van Walbeek, Corné Tob Control Research Paper BACKGROUND: The tobacco industry claims that illicit trade in cigarettes has increased sharply since the 1990s and that government has lost substantial tax revenue. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine whether cigarette excise tax revenue has been below budget in recent years, compared with previous decades. (2) To determine trends in the size of the illicit market since 1995. METHODS: For (1), mean percentage errors and root mean square percentage errors were calculated for budget revenue deviation for three products (cigarettes, beer and spirits), for various subperiods. For (2), predicted changes in total consumption, using actual cigarette price and GDP changes and previously published price and income elasticity estimates, were calculated and compared with changes in tax-paid consumption. RESULTS: Cigarette excise revenues were 0.7% below budget for 2000–2012 on average, compared with 3.0% below budget for beer and 4.7% below budget for spirits. There is no evidence that illicit trade in cigarettes in South Africa increased between 2002 and 2009. There is a substantial increase in illicit trade in 2010, probably peaking in 2011. In 2012 tax-paid consumption of cigarettes increased 2.6%, implying that the illicit market share decreased an estimated 0.6 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS: Other than in 2010, there is no evidence that illicit trade is significantly undermining government revenue. Claims that illicit trade has consistently increased over the past 15 years, and has continued its sharp increase since 2010, are not supported. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05 2014-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4078715/ /pubmed/24431121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051178 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
van Walbeek, Corné
Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa
title Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa
title_full Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa
title_fullStr Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa
title_short Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa
title_sort measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of south africa
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051178
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwalbeekcorne measuringchangesintheillicitcigarettemarketusinggovernmentrevenuedatatheexampleofsouthafrica