Cargando…

Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study

BACKGROUND: The issue of safety in the surgical procedure has recently been widely and openly discussed at the World Health Organization. The use of latex gloves is the current standard of protection during surgery, as they remain intact throughout the procedure. The present study was designed to ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giordano, Vincenzo, Koch, Hilton Augusto, de Sousa Prado, Juliano, de Morais, Leonardo Schiavo, de Araújo Hara, Rafael, de Souza, Felipe Serrão, do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-26
_version_ 1782323799590436864
author Giordano, Vincenzo
Koch, Hilton Augusto
de Sousa Prado, Juliano
de Morais, Leonardo Schiavo
de Araújo Hara, Rafael
de Souza, Felipe Serrão
do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro
author_facet Giordano, Vincenzo
Koch, Hilton Augusto
de Sousa Prado, Juliano
de Morais, Leonardo Schiavo
de Araújo Hara, Rafael
de Souza, Felipe Serrão
do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro
author_sort Giordano, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The issue of safety in the surgical procedure has recently been widely and openly discussed at the World Health Organization. The use of latex gloves is the current standard of protection during surgery, as they remain intact throughout the procedure. The present study was designed to evaluate the rate of glove perforation during a two-hand technique using polyester sutures in a controlled experimental study. METHODS: Hypothesis was that the gloves used during a two-hand technique using polyester suture suffer punctures. We used 150 pairs of gloves during the experiment. Each investigator performed 30 tests always using double gloving. They made five surgical knots on each test over a custom-made table specifically developed for the experiment. Ten tests were done at a time with a week- interval. The Control Group (CG) has 30 pairs of intact surgical gloves. The gloves were tested to impermeability by water filling and leaking was observed at three different times. Statistics relating to the perforation rate were analyzed using the chi-square test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the experiment there was no loss of gloves by drilling or inadvertent error in performing the impermeability test. No perforations were detected at any time during the impermeability test with the gloves used for sutures. Also, the CG presented no leakage of the liquid used for the test. There was no statistical difference between the groups underwent suture nor between them and the GC. CONCLUSION: Under the studied conditions, the authors’ hypotheses could not be proved. There was no damage to the surgical gloves during the entire experiment. The authors believe that the skin abrasions observed in the ulnar side of the little finger, constant throughout the experiment, must be caused by friction. We feel there is no risk of perforation of surgical gloves during a two-hand technique using polyester suture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4078929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40789292014-07-03 Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study Giordano, Vincenzo Koch, Hilton Augusto de Sousa Prado, Juliano de Morais, Leonardo Schiavo de Araújo Hara, Rafael de Souza, Felipe Serrão do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: The issue of safety in the surgical procedure has recently been widely and openly discussed at the World Health Organization. The use of latex gloves is the current standard of protection during surgery, as they remain intact throughout the procedure. The present study was designed to evaluate the rate of glove perforation during a two-hand technique using polyester sutures in a controlled experimental study. METHODS: Hypothesis was that the gloves used during a two-hand technique using polyester suture suffer punctures. We used 150 pairs of gloves during the experiment. Each investigator performed 30 tests always using double gloving. They made five surgical knots on each test over a custom-made table specifically developed for the experiment. Ten tests were done at a time with a week- interval. The Control Group (CG) has 30 pairs of intact surgical gloves. The gloves were tested to impermeability by water filling and leaking was observed at three different times. Statistics relating to the perforation rate were analyzed using the chi-square test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the experiment there was no loss of gloves by drilling or inadvertent error in performing the impermeability test. No perforations were detected at any time during the impermeability test with the gloves used for sutures. Also, the CG presented no leakage of the liquid used for the test. There was no statistical difference between the groups underwent suture nor between them and the GC. CONCLUSION: Under the studied conditions, the authors’ hypotheses could not be proved. There was no damage to the surgical gloves during the entire experiment. The authors believe that the skin abrasions observed in the ulnar side of the little finger, constant throughout the experiment, must be caused by friction. We feel there is no risk of perforation of surgical gloves during a two-hand technique using polyester suture. BioMed Central 2014-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4078929/ /pubmed/24991234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-26 Text en Copyright © 2014 Giordano et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Giordano, Vincenzo
Koch, Hilton Augusto
de Sousa Prado, Juliano
de Morais, Leonardo Schiavo
de Araújo Hara, Rafael
de Souza, Felipe Serrão
do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro
Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
title Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
title_full Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
title_fullStr Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
title_short Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
title_sort is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? an experimental study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-26
work_keys_str_mv AT giordanovincenzo isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy
AT kochhiltonaugusto isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy
AT desousapradojuliano isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy
AT demoraisleonardoschiavo isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy
AT dearaujohararafael isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy
AT desouzafelipeserrao isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy
AT doamaralneypecegueiro isthesurgicalknottyingtechniqueassociatedwithariskforunnoticedgloveperforationanexperimentalstudy