Cargando…

Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?

Asthma is a common childhood atopic disease associated with chronicity and impaired quality of life. As there is no cure for this disease, treatment relies on avoidance of triggers such as food and aeroallergens, the use of inhaled bronchodilators/corticosteroids and antiallergic or immunomodulating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hon, Kam Lun Ellis, Leung, Ting Fan, Leung, Alexander KC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S39100
_version_ 1782323878347931648
author Hon, Kam Lun Ellis
Leung, Ting Fan
Leung, Alexander KC
author_facet Hon, Kam Lun Ellis
Leung, Ting Fan
Leung, Alexander KC
author_sort Hon, Kam Lun Ellis
collection PubMed
description Asthma is a common childhood atopic disease associated with chronicity and impaired quality of life. As there is no cure for this disease, treatment relies on avoidance of triggers such as food and aeroallergens, the use of inhaled bronchodilators/corticosteroids and antiallergic or immunomodulating therapies. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and bronchodilators have been the mainstay. However, in Asia, myths and fallacies regarding Western medicine and corticosteroids are prevalent and lead to nonadherence to treatment. Also, use of traditional and proprietary herbal medicines is popular. In the past decades, a novel class of nonsteroidal immunomodulating montelukasts has become available. This article reviews the evidence for the effectiveness and clinical efficacy of these medications. A number of randomized and controlled trials have been performed over the years. The majority of studies confirm the usefulness of montelukast as monotherapy and add-on therapy to ICS in mild to moderate childhood asthma across all age groups. ICSs are generally superior to montelukasts for asthma management. However, montelukast has a place in the treatment of young children with viral-triggered wheezing diseases, exercise-induced asthma, and in children whose parents are steroid-phobic and find ICS unacceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4079631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40796312014-07-24 Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses? Hon, Kam Lun Ellis Leung, Ting Fan Leung, Alexander KC Drug Des Devel Ther Review Asthma is a common childhood atopic disease associated with chronicity and impaired quality of life. As there is no cure for this disease, treatment relies on avoidance of triggers such as food and aeroallergens, the use of inhaled bronchodilators/corticosteroids and antiallergic or immunomodulating therapies. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and bronchodilators have been the mainstay. However, in Asia, myths and fallacies regarding Western medicine and corticosteroids are prevalent and lead to nonadherence to treatment. Also, use of traditional and proprietary herbal medicines is popular. In the past decades, a novel class of nonsteroidal immunomodulating montelukasts has become available. This article reviews the evidence for the effectiveness and clinical efficacy of these medications. A number of randomized and controlled trials have been performed over the years. The majority of studies confirm the usefulness of montelukast as monotherapy and add-on therapy to ICS in mild to moderate childhood asthma across all age groups. ICSs are generally superior to montelukasts for asthma management. However, montelukast has a place in the treatment of young children with viral-triggered wheezing diseases, exercise-induced asthma, and in children whose parents are steroid-phobic and find ICS unacceptable. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4079631/ /pubmed/25061277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S39100 Text en © 2014 Hon et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Hon, Kam Lun Ellis
Leung, Ting Fan
Leung, Alexander KC
Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
title Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
title_full Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
title_short Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
title_sort clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. what are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S39100
work_keys_str_mv AT honkamlunellis clinicaleffectivenessandsafetyofmontelukastinasthmawhataretheconclusionsfromclinicaltrialsandmetaanalyses
AT leungtingfan clinicaleffectivenessandsafetyofmontelukastinasthmawhataretheconclusionsfromclinicaltrialsandmetaanalyses
AT leungalexanderkc clinicaleffectivenessandsafetyofmontelukastinasthmawhataretheconclusionsfromclinicaltrialsandmetaanalyses