Cargando…

Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction

In recent years, a number of modalities have become available for the noninvasive reduction of adipose tissue, including cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, low-level laser, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Each technology employs a different mechanism of action to cause apoptosis or necrosis of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krueger, Nils, Mai, Sophia V, Luebberding, Stefanie, Sadick, Neil S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061326
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S44371
_version_ 1782323878794625024
author Krueger, Nils
Mai, Sophia V
Luebberding, Stefanie
Sadick, Neil S
author_facet Krueger, Nils
Mai, Sophia V
Luebberding, Stefanie
Sadick, Neil S
author_sort Krueger, Nils
collection PubMed
description In recent years, a number of modalities have become available for the noninvasive reduction of adipose tissue, including cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, low-level laser, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Each technology employs a different mechanism of action to cause apoptosis or necrosis of the targeted adipocytes. Among these technologies, cryolipolysis has not only been commercially available for the longest time, but has also been best researched including in vitro and animal models and randomized controlled clinical trials in humans. The principle behind cryolipolysis exploits the premise that adipocytes are more susceptible to cooling than other skin cells. The precise application of cold temperatures triggers apoptosis of the adipocytes, which invokes an inflammatory response and leads to slow digestion by surrounding macrophages. In clinical studies, cryolipolysis was shown to reduce subcutaneous fat at the treatment site by up to 25% after one treatment. Improvements were seen in 86% of treated subjects. At 73%, the patient satisfaction rate is higher than with other technologies used for noninvasive lipolysis. Cryolipolysis has been proven to be a very safe method for body contouring, and is accomplished with only minimal discomfort. Expected side effects are temporary erythema, bruising, and transient numbness that usually resolve within 14 days after treatment. With a prevalence of 0.1%, the most common complaint is late-onset pain, occurring 2 weeks post-procedure, which resolves without intervention. Although no procedure has been accepted as the gold standard for noninvasive body contouring as yet, cryolipolysis is considered to be both safe and efficient with a high patient satisfaction rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4079633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40796332014-07-24 Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction Krueger, Nils Mai, Sophia V Luebberding, Stefanie Sadick, Neil S Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Review In recent years, a number of modalities have become available for the noninvasive reduction of adipose tissue, including cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, low-level laser, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Each technology employs a different mechanism of action to cause apoptosis or necrosis of the targeted adipocytes. Among these technologies, cryolipolysis has not only been commercially available for the longest time, but has also been best researched including in vitro and animal models and randomized controlled clinical trials in humans. The principle behind cryolipolysis exploits the premise that adipocytes are more susceptible to cooling than other skin cells. The precise application of cold temperatures triggers apoptosis of the adipocytes, which invokes an inflammatory response and leads to slow digestion by surrounding macrophages. In clinical studies, cryolipolysis was shown to reduce subcutaneous fat at the treatment site by up to 25% after one treatment. Improvements were seen in 86% of treated subjects. At 73%, the patient satisfaction rate is higher than with other technologies used for noninvasive lipolysis. Cryolipolysis has been proven to be a very safe method for body contouring, and is accomplished with only minimal discomfort. Expected side effects are temporary erythema, bruising, and transient numbness that usually resolve within 14 days after treatment. With a prevalence of 0.1%, the most common complaint is late-onset pain, occurring 2 weeks post-procedure, which resolves without intervention. Although no procedure has been accepted as the gold standard for noninvasive body contouring as yet, cryolipolysis is considered to be both safe and efficient with a high patient satisfaction rate. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4079633/ /pubmed/25061326 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S44371 Text en © 2014 Krueger et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Krueger, Nils
Mai, Sophia V
Luebberding, Stefanie
Sadick, Neil S
Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
title Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
title_full Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
title_fullStr Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
title_short Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
title_sort cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061326
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S44371
work_keys_str_mv AT kruegernils cryolipolysisfornoninvasivebodycontouringclinicalefficacyandpatientsatisfaction
AT maisophiav cryolipolysisfornoninvasivebodycontouringclinicalefficacyandpatientsatisfaction
AT luebberdingstefanie cryolipolysisfornoninvasivebodycontouringclinicalefficacyandpatientsatisfaction
AT sadickneils cryolipolysisfornoninvasivebodycontouringclinicalefficacyandpatientsatisfaction