Cargando…
Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
PURPOSE: Sanger sequencing is currently considered the gold standard methodology for clinical molecular diagnostic testing. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) has already emerged as a much more efficient means to identify genetic variants within gene panels, the exome, or the genome. We sough...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.183 |
_version_ | 1782323898120929280 |
---|---|
author | Strom, Samuel P. Lee, Hane Das, Kingshuk Vilain, Eric Nelson, Stanley F. Grody, Wayne W. Deignan, Joshua L. |
author_facet | Strom, Samuel P. Lee, Hane Das, Kingshuk Vilain, Eric Nelson, Stanley F. Grody, Wayne W. Deignan, Joshua L. |
author_sort | Strom, Samuel P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Sanger sequencing is currently considered the gold standard methodology for clinical molecular diagnostic testing. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) has already emerged as a much more efficient means to identify genetic variants within gene panels, the exome, or the genome. We sought to assess the accuracy of NGS variant identification in our clinical genomics laboratory with the goal of establishing a quality score threshold for confirmatory Sanger-based testing. METHODS: Confirmation data for reported results from 144 sequential clinical exome sequencing cases (94 unique variants) and an additional set of 16 variants from comparable research samples were analyzed. RESULTS: 103 of 110 total SNVs analyzed had a quality score ≥Q500, 103 (100%) of which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Of the remaining 7 variants with quality scores <Q500, 6 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (85%). CONCLUSIONS: For single nucleotide variants, we predict we will be able to reduce our Sanger confirmation workload going forward by 70–80%. This serves as a proof of principle that as long as sufficient validation and quality control measures are implemented, the volume of Sanger confirmation can be reduced, alleviating a significant amount of the labor and cost burden on clinical laboratories wishing to utilize NGS technology. However, Sanger confirmation of low quality single nucleotide variants and all indels (insertions or deletions less than 10 bp) remains necessary at this time in our laboratory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4079763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40797632015-07-01 Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory Strom, Samuel P. Lee, Hane Das, Kingshuk Vilain, Eric Nelson, Stanley F. Grody, Wayne W. Deignan, Joshua L. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Sanger sequencing is currently considered the gold standard methodology for clinical molecular diagnostic testing. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) has already emerged as a much more efficient means to identify genetic variants within gene panels, the exome, or the genome. We sought to assess the accuracy of NGS variant identification in our clinical genomics laboratory with the goal of establishing a quality score threshold for confirmatory Sanger-based testing. METHODS: Confirmation data for reported results from 144 sequential clinical exome sequencing cases (94 unique variants) and an additional set of 16 variants from comparable research samples were analyzed. RESULTS: 103 of 110 total SNVs analyzed had a quality score ≥Q500, 103 (100%) of which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Of the remaining 7 variants with quality scores <Q500, 6 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (85%). CONCLUSIONS: For single nucleotide variants, we predict we will be able to reduce our Sanger confirmation workload going forward by 70–80%. This serves as a proof of principle that as long as sufficient validation and quality control measures are implemented, the volume of Sanger confirmation can be reduced, alleviating a significant amount of the labor and cost burden on clinical laboratories wishing to utilize NGS technology. However, Sanger confirmation of low quality single nucleotide variants and all indels (insertions or deletions less than 10 bp) remains necessary at this time in our laboratory. 2014-01-09 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4079763/ /pubmed/24406459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.183 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Strom, Samuel P. Lee, Hane Das, Kingshuk Vilain, Eric Nelson, Stanley F. Grody, Wayne W. Deignan, Joshua L. Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
title | Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
title_full | Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
title_fullStr | Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
title_short | Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
title_sort | assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stromsamuelp assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory AT leehane assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory AT daskingshuk assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory AT vilaineric assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory AT nelsonstanleyf assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory AT grodywaynew assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory AT deignanjoshual assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory |