Cargando…

Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory

PURPOSE: Sanger sequencing is currently considered the gold standard methodology for clinical molecular diagnostic testing. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) has already emerged as a much more efficient means to identify genetic variants within gene panels, the exome, or the genome. We sough...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strom, Samuel P., Lee, Hane, Das, Kingshuk, Vilain, Eric, Nelson, Stanley F., Grody, Wayne W., Deignan, Joshua L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.183
_version_ 1782323898120929280
author Strom, Samuel P.
Lee, Hane
Das, Kingshuk
Vilain, Eric
Nelson, Stanley F.
Grody, Wayne W.
Deignan, Joshua L.
author_facet Strom, Samuel P.
Lee, Hane
Das, Kingshuk
Vilain, Eric
Nelson, Stanley F.
Grody, Wayne W.
Deignan, Joshua L.
author_sort Strom, Samuel P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Sanger sequencing is currently considered the gold standard methodology for clinical molecular diagnostic testing. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) has already emerged as a much more efficient means to identify genetic variants within gene panels, the exome, or the genome. We sought to assess the accuracy of NGS variant identification in our clinical genomics laboratory with the goal of establishing a quality score threshold for confirmatory Sanger-based testing. METHODS: Confirmation data for reported results from 144 sequential clinical exome sequencing cases (94 unique variants) and an additional set of 16 variants from comparable research samples were analyzed. RESULTS: 103 of 110 total SNVs analyzed had a quality score ≥Q500, 103 (100%) of which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Of the remaining 7 variants with quality scores <Q500, 6 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (85%). CONCLUSIONS: For single nucleotide variants, we predict we will be able to reduce our Sanger confirmation workload going forward by 70–80%. This serves as a proof of principle that as long as sufficient validation and quality control measures are implemented, the volume of Sanger confirmation can be reduced, alleviating a significant amount of the labor and cost burden on clinical laboratories wishing to utilize NGS technology. However, Sanger confirmation of low quality single nucleotide variants and all indels (insertions or deletions less than 10 bp) remains necessary at this time in our laboratory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4079763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40797632015-07-01 Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory Strom, Samuel P. Lee, Hane Das, Kingshuk Vilain, Eric Nelson, Stanley F. Grody, Wayne W. Deignan, Joshua L. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Sanger sequencing is currently considered the gold standard methodology for clinical molecular diagnostic testing. However, next generation sequencing (NGS) has already emerged as a much more efficient means to identify genetic variants within gene panels, the exome, or the genome. We sought to assess the accuracy of NGS variant identification in our clinical genomics laboratory with the goal of establishing a quality score threshold for confirmatory Sanger-based testing. METHODS: Confirmation data for reported results from 144 sequential clinical exome sequencing cases (94 unique variants) and an additional set of 16 variants from comparable research samples were analyzed. RESULTS: 103 of 110 total SNVs analyzed had a quality score ≥Q500, 103 (100%) of which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Of the remaining 7 variants with quality scores <Q500, 6 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (85%). CONCLUSIONS: For single nucleotide variants, we predict we will be able to reduce our Sanger confirmation workload going forward by 70–80%. This serves as a proof of principle that as long as sufficient validation and quality control measures are implemented, the volume of Sanger confirmation can be reduced, alleviating a significant amount of the labor and cost burden on clinical laboratories wishing to utilize NGS technology. However, Sanger confirmation of low quality single nucleotide variants and all indels (insertions or deletions less than 10 bp) remains necessary at this time in our laboratory. 2014-01-09 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4079763/ /pubmed/24406459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.183 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Strom, Samuel P.
Lee, Hane
Das, Kingshuk
Vilain, Eric
Nelson, Stanley F.
Grody, Wayne W.
Deignan, Joshua L.
Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
title Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
title_full Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
title_fullStr Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
title_short Assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
title_sort assessing the necessity of confirmatory testing for exome sequencing results in a clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.183
work_keys_str_mv AT stromsamuelp assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory
AT leehane assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory
AT daskingshuk assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory
AT vilaineric assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory
AT nelsonstanleyf assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory
AT grodywaynew assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory
AT deignanjoshual assessingthenecessityofconfirmatorytestingforexomesequencingresultsinaclinicalmoleculardiagnosticlaboratory