Cargando…

Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: Impaired functional outcome is common after a low anterior resection (LAR). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) might improve functional outcome after a LAR. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of PFR in improving functional outcome. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, Wilhelmina S, te Riele, Wouter W, Boerma, Djamila, van Ramshorst, Bert, van Westreenen, Henderik L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.3.109
_version_ 1782323899722104832
author Visser, Wilhelmina S
te Riele, Wouter W
Boerma, Djamila
van Ramshorst, Bert
van Westreenen, Henderik L
author_facet Visser, Wilhelmina S
te Riele, Wouter W
Boerma, Djamila
van Ramshorst, Bert
van Westreenen, Henderik L
author_sort Visser, Wilhelmina S
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Impaired functional outcome is common after a low anterior resection (LAR). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) might improve functional outcome after a LAR. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of PFR in improving functional outcome. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms fecal incontinence, colorectal neoplasm/surgery, LAR, rectal cancer, anterior resection syndrome, bowel habit, pelvic floor, training, therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation and biofeedback. Of the 125 identified records, 5 articles were included. RESULTS: The 5 included studies reported on 321 patients, of which 286 patients (89%) underwent pelvic floor training. Three studies included patients with anterior resection syndrome after a LAR while the remaining studies included a series of patients after a LAR. Functional outcome was mostly assessed by using the Wexner incontinence scale. Quality of life was assessed in one study, and in three studies, rectal manometry was performed. After PFR, the functional outcome was improved in four studies, as was the quality of life. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated that PFR is useful for improving the functional outcome after a LAR. The data are extracted from studies of limited quality, but the available evidence points to the effectiveness of the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4079807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40798072014-07-04 Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review Visser, Wilhelmina S te Riele, Wouter W Boerma, Djamila van Ramshorst, Bert van Westreenen, Henderik L Ann Coloproctol Review PURPOSE: Impaired functional outcome is common after a low anterior resection (LAR). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) might improve functional outcome after a LAR. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of PFR in improving functional outcome. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms fecal incontinence, colorectal neoplasm/surgery, LAR, rectal cancer, anterior resection syndrome, bowel habit, pelvic floor, training, therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation and biofeedback. Of the 125 identified records, 5 articles were included. RESULTS: The 5 included studies reported on 321 patients, of which 286 patients (89%) underwent pelvic floor training. Three studies included patients with anterior resection syndrome after a LAR while the remaining studies included a series of patients after a LAR. Functional outcome was mostly assessed by using the Wexner incontinence scale. Quality of life was assessed in one study, and in three studies, rectal manometry was performed. After PFR, the functional outcome was improved in four studies, as was the quality of life. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated that PFR is useful for improving the functional outcome after a LAR. The data are extracted from studies of limited quality, but the available evidence points to the effectiveness of the procedure. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2014-06 2014-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4079807/ /pubmed/24999460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.3.109 Text en © 2014 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Visser, Wilhelmina S
te Riele, Wouter W
Boerma, Djamila
van Ramshorst, Bert
van Westreenen, Henderik L
Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review
title Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review
title_short Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review
title_sort pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome after a low anterior resection: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.3.109
work_keys_str_mv AT visserwilhelminas pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeafteralowanteriorresectionasystematicreview
AT terielewouterw pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeafteralowanteriorresectionasystematicreview
AT boermadjamila pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeafteralowanteriorresectionasystematicreview
AT vanramshorstbert pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeafteralowanteriorresectionasystematicreview
AT vanwestreenenhenderikl pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeafteralowanteriorresectionasystematicreview