Cargando…

Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?

The majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present at the time of diagnosis with stage IV metastatic disease and they experience 2 or more disease-related symptoms. These symptoms may have a negative impact on their health-related quality of life (HR QOL). Data has shown many of these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hirsh, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4080131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25072024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00173
_version_ 1782323934635491328
author Hirsh, Vera
author_facet Hirsh, Vera
author_sort Hirsh, Vera
collection PubMed
description The majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present at the time of diagnosis with stage IV metastatic disease and they experience 2 or more disease-related symptoms. These symptoms may have a negative impact on their health-related quality of life (HR QOL). Data has shown many of these patients prefer a therapy to improve their symptoms rather than receive a therapy which slightly prolongs their survival without improving their symptoms. The improvement of disease-related symptoms on a specific drug or regimen augments the significance of prolongation of the progression-free survival or the response rate as well as symptom worsening. The choice of the questionnaires to evaluate patients’ reported outcomes and HR QOL benefits and the methods of collecting the data and their interpretations are very important. Only if the data are collected and analyzed properly will they be meaningful and can then be viewed as components that add the total value to a treatment and provide a comprehensive picture of the benefits and risks of a certain anticancer therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4080131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40801312014-07-28 Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted? Hirsh, Vera Front Oncol Oncology The majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present at the time of diagnosis with stage IV metastatic disease and they experience 2 or more disease-related symptoms. These symptoms may have a negative impact on their health-related quality of life (HR QOL). Data has shown many of these patients prefer a therapy to improve their symptoms rather than receive a therapy which slightly prolongs their survival without improving their symptoms. The improvement of disease-related symptoms on a specific drug or regimen augments the significance of prolongation of the progression-free survival or the response rate as well as symptom worsening. The choice of the questionnaires to evaluate patients’ reported outcomes and HR QOL benefits and the methods of collecting the data and their interpretations are very important. Only if the data are collected and analyzed properly will they be meaningful and can then be viewed as components that add the total value to a treatment and provide a comprehensive picture of the benefits and risks of a certain anticancer therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4080131/ /pubmed/25072024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00173 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hirsh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hirsh, Vera
Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?
title Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?
title_full Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?
title_fullStr Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?
title_short Is the Evaluation of Quality of Life in NSCLC Trials Important? Are the Results to be Trusted?
title_sort is the evaluation of quality of life in nsclc trials important? are the results to be trusted?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4080131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25072024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00173
work_keys_str_mv AT hirshvera istheevaluationofqualityoflifeinnsclctrialsimportantaretheresultstobetrusted