Cargando…

Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease

Recent researches reported behavioral and emotional impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD), even in the earliest stages. This impairment affects also decision-making and learning processes. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is commonly used to examine the decision-making capacity. The purpose of the pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mapelli, Daniela, Di Rosa, Elisa, Cavalletti, Matteo, Schiff, Sami, Tamburin, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4080179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00684
_version_ 1782323939124445184
author Mapelli, Daniela
Di Rosa, Elisa
Cavalletti, Matteo
Schiff, Sami
Tamburin, Stefano
author_facet Mapelli, Daniela
Di Rosa, Elisa
Cavalletti, Matteo
Schiff, Sami
Tamburin, Stefano
author_sort Mapelli, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Recent researches reported behavioral and emotional impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD), even in the earliest stages. This impairment affects also decision-making and learning processes. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is commonly used to examine the decision-making capacity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the neural correlates of feedback evaluation in the decision-making process into a learning context, using IGT and event-related potentials (ERPs) in a group of non-demented medicated PD patients. Fifteen PD patients and 15 healthy controls were recruited for the study. PD patients were administrated a basic neuropsychological assessment oriented to exclude cognitive impairments. Both groups underwent the computerized IGT during electroencephalography (EEG) registration. To analyse ERPs, continuous EEG data were epoched within a time-window starting 1000 ms before and ending 1000 ms after feedback presentation and averaged separately for positive (i.e., win condition) and negative (i.e., loss condition) feedbacks. Behavioral data revealed a significant lower performance of PD patients (p < 0.05) compared with the controls. While controls demonstrated a correct feedback evaluation, PD patients did not show any learning, selecting more disadvantageous decks even in the last part of task. Furthermore, ERPs results revealed that controls showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in ERPs morphology recorded after the win and the loss conditions, suggesting that positive and negative feedbacks were differently evaluated and processed. PD patients showed a different pattern: their ERPs morphology was the same for positive and negative feedback. Interestingly, our ERPs results suggest that in PD patients an incorrect evaluation of context-relevant outcomes could be the reason of a poor performance in decision-making tasks, and could explain cognitive and behavioral problems related to impulse control disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4080179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40801792014-07-28 Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease Mapelli, Daniela Di Rosa, Elisa Cavalletti, Matteo Schiff, Sami Tamburin, Stefano Front Psychol Psychology Recent researches reported behavioral and emotional impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD), even in the earliest stages. This impairment affects also decision-making and learning processes. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is commonly used to examine the decision-making capacity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the neural correlates of feedback evaluation in the decision-making process into a learning context, using IGT and event-related potentials (ERPs) in a group of non-demented medicated PD patients. Fifteen PD patients and 15 healthy controls were recruited for the study. PD patients were administrated a basic neuropsychological assessment oriented to exclude cognitive impairments. Both groups underwent the computerized IGT during electroencephalography (EEG) registration. To analyse ERPs, continuous EEG data were epoched within a time-window starting 1000 ms before and ending 1000 ms after feedback presentation and averaged separately for positive (i.e., win condition) and negative (i.e., loss condition) feedbacks. Behavioral data revealed a significant lower performance of PD patients (p < 0.05) compared with the controls. While controls demonstrated a correct feedback evaluation, PD patients did not show any learning, selecting more disadvantageous decks even in the last part of task. Furthermore, ERPs results revealed that controls showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in ERPs morphology recorded after the win and the loss conditions, suggesting that positive and negative feedbacks were differently evaluated and processed. PD patients showed a different pattern: their ERPs morphology was the same for positive and negative feedback. Interestingly, our ERPs results suggest that in PD patients an incorrect evaluation of context-relevant outcomes could be the reason of a poor performance in decision-making tasks, and could explain cognitive and behavioral problems related to impulse control disorder. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4080179/ /pubmed/25071654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00684 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mapelli, Di Rosa, Cavalletti, Schiff and Tamburin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mapelli, Daniela
Di Rosa, Elisa
Cavalletti, Matteo
Schiff, Sami
Tamburin, Stefano
Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
title Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
title_full Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
title_short Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
title_sort decision and dopaminergic system: an erps study of iowa gambling task in parkinson’s disease
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4080179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00684
work_keys_str_mv AT mapellidaniela decisionanddopaminergicsystemanerpsstudyofiowagamblingtaskinparkinsonsdisease
AT dirosaelisa decisionanddopaminergicsystemanerpsstudyofiowagamblingtaskinparkinsonsdisease
AT cavallettimatteo decisionanddopaminergicsystemanerpsstudyofiowagamblingtaskinparkinsonsdisease
AT schiffsami decisionanddopaminergicsystemanerpsstudyofiowagamblingtaskinparkinsonsdisease
AT tamburinstefano decisionanddopaminergicsystemanerpsstudyofiowagamblingtaskinparkinsonsdisease