Cargando…
The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index
BACKGROUND: Reported values of the minimal important change (MIC) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) for the neck disability index (NDI) differ strongly, raising questions about the generalizability of these parameters. The SDC and the MIC are possibly influenced by the study design or by the...
Autores principales: | Schuller, Wouter, Ostelo, Raymond WJG, Janssen, Richard, de Vet, Henrica CW |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4080689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24735985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-53 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Minimally important change and smallest detectable change of the OSTRC questionnaire in half‐ and full‐marathon runners
por: Franke, Thierry P. C., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change
por: de Vet, Henrica C, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating
an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
por: de Vet, Henrica C. W., et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Pain trajectories and possible predictors of a favourable course of low back pain in patients consulting musculoskeletal physicians in The Netherlands
por: Schuller, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Responsiveness and minimal important change for the ProFitMap-neck questionnaire and the Neck Disability Index in women with neck–shoulder pain
por: Björklund, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)