Cargando…

Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial

BACKGROUND: The clinical dehydration scale (CDS) is a quick, easy-to-use tool with 4 clinical items and a score of 1–8 that serves to classify dehydration in children with gastroenteritis as no, some or moderate/severe dehydration. Studies validating the CDS (Friedman JN) with a comparison group rem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tam, Ron K, Wong, Hubert, Plint, Amy, Lepage, Nathalie, Filler, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24935348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-149
_version_ 1782324112944791552
author Tam, Ron K
Wong, Hubert
Plint, Amy
Lepage, Nathalie
Filler, Guido
author_facet Tam, Ron K
Wong, Hubert
Plint, Amy
Lepage, Nathalie
Filler, Guido
author_sort Tam, Ron K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical dehydration scale (CDS) is a quick, easy-to-use tool with 4 clinical items and a score of 1–8 that serves to classify dehydration in children with gastroenteritis as no, some or moderate/severe dehydration. Studies validating the CDS (Friedman JN) with a comparison group remain elusive. We hypothesized that the CDS correlates with a wide spectrum of established markers of dehydration, making it an appropriate and easy-to-use clinical tool. METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective double-cohort trial in a single tertiary care center. Children with diarrhea and vomiting, who clinically required intravenous fluids for rehydration, were compared with minor trauma patients who required intravenous needling for conscious sedation. We compared the CDS with clinical and urinary markers (urinary electrolytes, proteins, ratios and fractional excretions) for dehydration in both groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We enrolled 73 children (male = 36) in the dehydration group and 143 (male = 105) in the comparison group. Median age was 32 months (range 3–214) in the dehydration and 96 months (range 2.6-214 months, p < 0.0001) in the trauma group. Median CDS was 3 (range 0–8) within the dehydration group and 0 in the comparison group (p < 0.0001). The following parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the comparison group and the dehydrated group: difference in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, urine sodium/potassium ratio, urine sodium, fractional sodium excretion, serum bicarbonate, and creatinine measurements. The best markers for dehydration were urine Na and serum bicarbonate (ROC AUC = 0.798 and 0.821, respectively). CDS was most closely correlated with serum bicarbonate (Pearson r = -0.3696, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although serum bicarbonate is not the gold standard for dehydration, this study provides further evidence for the usefulness of the CDS as a dehydration marker in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00462527) on April 18, 2007.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4081489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40814892014-07-18 Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial Tam, Ron K Wong, Hubert Plint, Amy Lepage, Nathalie Filler, Guido BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The clinical dehydration scale (CDS) is a quick, easy-to-use tool with 4 clinical items and a score of 1–8 that serves to classify dehydration in children with gastroenteritis as no, some or moderate/severe dehydration. Studies validating the CDS (Friedman JN) with a comparison group remain elusive. We hypothesized that the CDS correlates with a wide spectrum of established markers of dehydration, making it an appropriate and easy-to-use clinical tool. METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective double-cohort trial in a single tertiary care center. Children with diarrhea and vomiting, who clinically required intravenous fluids for rehydration, were compared with minor trauma patients who required intravenous needling for conscious sedation. We compared the CDS with clinical and urinary markers (urinary electrolytes, proteins, ratios and fractional excretions) for dehydration in both groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We enrolled 73 children (male = 36) in the dehydration group and 143 (male = 105) in the comparison group. Median age was 32 months (range 3–214) in the dehydration and 96 months (range 2.6-214 months, p < 0.0001) in the trauma group. Median CDS was 3 (range 0–8) within the dehydration group and 0 in the comparison group (p < 0.0001). The following parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the comparison group and the dehydrated group: difference in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, urine sodium/potassium ratio, urine sodium, fractional sodium excretion, serum bicarbonate, and creatinine measurements. The best markers for dehydration were urine Na and serum bicarbonate (ROC AUC = 0.798 and 0.821, respectively). CDS was most closely correlated with serum bicarbonate (Pearson r = -0.3696, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although serum bicarbonate is not the gold standard for dehydration, this study provides further evidence for the usefulness of the CDS as a dehydration marker in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00462527) on April 18, 2007. BioMed Central 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4081489/ /pubmed/24935348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-149 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tam, Ron K
Wong, Hubert
Plint, Amy
Lepage, Nathalie
Filler, Guido
Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
title Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
title_full Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
title_short Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
title_sort comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24935348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-149
work_keys_str_mv AT tamronk comparisonofclinicalandbiochemicalmarkersofdehydrationwiththeclinicaldehydrationscaleinchildrenacasecomparisontrial
AT wonghubert comparisonofclinicalandbiochemicalmarkersofdehydrationwiththeclinicaldehydrationscaleinchildrenacasecomparisontrial
AT plintamy comparisonofclinicalandbiochemicalmarkersofdehydrationwiththeclinicaldehydrationscaleinchildrenacasecomparisontrial
AT lepagenathalie comparisonofclinicalandbiochemicalmarkersofdehydrationwiththeclinicaldehydrationscaleinchildrenacasecomparisontrial
AT fillerguido comparisonofclinicalandbiochemicalmarkersofdehydrationwiththeclinicaldehydrationscaleinchildrenacasecomparisontrial