Cargando…
Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24943129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-233 |
_version_ | 1782324116166017024 |
---|---|
author | Kalimuddin, Shirin Phillips, Rachel Gandhi, Mihir de Souza, Nurun Nisa Low, Jenny GH Archuleta, Sophia Lye, David Tan, Thuan Tong |
author_facet | Kalimuddin, Shirin Phillips, Rachel Gandhi, Mihir de Souza, Nurun Nisa Low, Jenny GH Archuleta, Sophia Lye, David Tan, Thuan Tong |
author_sort | Kalimuddin, Shirin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of such infections. The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause 60-day mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a multicenter prospective open label phase IIB pilot randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be inpatients over 21-years-old with a positive blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 1.5ug/ml. Randomization into intervention or active control arms will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. We aim to recruit 50 participants over a period of two years. Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive vancomycin dose-while those randomized to the intervention arm will receive daptomycin. Participants will receive a minimum of 14 days study treatment. The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat principle. The Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the 60-day mortality rate from index blood cultures (primary endpoint) between the two treatment arms, and the exact two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated using the Clopper and Pearson method. Primary analysis will be conducted using a two sided alpha of 0.05. DISCUSSION: If results from this pilot study suggest that daptomycin shows significant efficacy in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, we aim to proceed with a larger scale confirmatory study. This would help guide clinicians and inform practice guidelines on the optimal treatment for such infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01975662, date of registration: 29 October 2013). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4081513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40815132014-07-05 Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial Kalimuddin, Shirin Phillips, Rachel Gandhi, Mihir de Souza, Nurun Nisa Low, Jenny GH Archuleta, Sophia Lye, David Tan, Thuan Tong Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of such infections. The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause 60-day mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a multicenter prospective open label phase IIB pilot randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be inpatients over 21-years-old with a positive blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 1.5ug/ml. Randomization into intervention or active control arms will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. We aim to recruit 50 participants over a period of two years. Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive vancomycin dose-while those randomized to the intervention arm will receive daptomycin. Participants will receive a minimum of 14 days study treatment. The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat principle. The Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the 60-day mortality rate from index blood cultures (primary endpoint) between the two treatment arms, and the exact two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated using the Clopper and Pearson method. Primary analysis will be conducted using a two sided alpha of 0.05. DISCUSSION: If results from this pilot study suggest that daptomycin shows significant efficacy in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, we aim to proceed with a larger scale confirmatory study. This would help guide clinicians and inform practice guidelines on the optimal treatment for such infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01975662, date of registration: 29 October 2013). BioMed Central 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4081513/ /pubmed/24943129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-233 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kalimuddin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kalimuddin, Shirin Phillips, Rachel Gandhi, Mihir de Souza, Nurun Nisa Low, Jenny GH Archuleta, Sophia Lye, David Tan, Thuan Tong Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial |
title | Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase iib randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24943129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalimuddinshirin vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT phillipsrachel vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gandhimihir vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT desouzanurunnisa vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lowjennygh vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT archuletasophia vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lyedavid vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tanthuantong vancomycinversusdaptomycinforthetreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaduetoisolateswithhighvancomycinminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsstudyprotocolforaphaseiibrandomizedcontrolledtrial |