Cargando…

Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa are often ambivalent about their eating disorder symptoms. Therefore, a lack of motivation to change is a frequent problem in the treatment of eating disorders. This is of high relevance, as a low motivation to change is a predictor of an unfavo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoetzel, Katrin, von Brachel, Ruth, Schlossmacher, Lena, Vocks, Silja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-38
_version_ 1782324157577428992
author Hoetzel, Katrin
von Brachel, Ruth
Schlossmacher, Lena
Vocks, Silja
author_facet Hoetzel, Katrin
von Brachel, Ruth
Schlossmacher, Lena
Vocks, Silja
author_sort Hoetzel, Katrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa are often ambivalent about their eating disorder symptoms. Therefore, a lack of motivation to change is a frequent problem in the treatment of eating disorders. This is of high relevance, as a low motivation to change is a predictor of an unfavourable treatment outcome and high treatment dropout rates. In order to quantify the degree of motivation to change, valid and reliable instruments are required in research and practice. The transtheoretical model of behaviour change (TTM) offers a framework for these measurements. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews existing instruments assessing motivation to change in eating disorders. METHOD: We screened N = 119 studies from the databases Medline and Psycinfo found by combinations of the search keywords ‘eating disorder’, ‘anorexia nervosa’, ‘bulimia nervosa’, ‘motivation’, ‘readiness to change’, ‘assessment’, ‘measurement’, and ‘questionnaire’. RESULTS: Ultimately, n = 15 studies investigating psychometric properties of different assessment tools of motivation to change in eating disorders were identified. Reviewed instruments can be divided into those assessing the stages of change according to the TTM (6 instruments) and those capturing decisional balance (3 instruments). Overall, the psychometric properties of these instruments are satisfactory to good. DISCUSSION: Advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the reviewed assessment tools are discussed. So far, the TTM provides the only framework to assess motivation to change in eating disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4081820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40818202014-07-05 Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review Hoetzel, Katrin von Brachel, Ruth Schlossmacher, Lena Vocks, Silja J Eat Disord Review BACKGROUND: Patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa are often ambivalent about their eating disorder symptoms. Therefore, a lack of motivation to change is a frequent problem in the treatment of eating disorders. This is of high relevance, as a low motivation to change is a predictor of an unfavourable treatment outcome and high treatment dropout rates. In order to quantify the degree of motivation to change, valid and reliable instruments are required in research and practice. The transtheoretical model of behaviour change (TTM) offers a framework for these measurements. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews existing instruments assessing motivation to change in eating disorders. METHOD: We screened N = 119 studies from the databases Medline and Psycinfo found by combinations of the search keywords ‘eating disorder’, ‘anorexia nervosa’, ‘bulimia nervosa’, ‘motivation’, ‘readiness to change’, ‘assessment’, ‘measurement’, and ‘questionnaire’. RESULTS: Ultimately, n = 15 studies investigating psychometric properties of different assessment tools of motivation to change in eating disorders were identified. Reviewed instruments can be divided into those assessing the stages of change according to the TTM (6 instruments) and those capturing decisional balance (3 instruments). Overall, the psychometric properties of these instruments are satisfactory to good. DISCUSSION: Advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the reviewed assessment tools are discussed. So far, the TTM provides the only framework to assess motivation to change in eating disorders. BioMed Central 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4081820/ /pubmed/24999416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-38 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hötzel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Hoetzel, Katrin
von Brachel, Ruth
Schlossmacher, Lena
Vocks, Silja
Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
title Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
title_full Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
title_short Assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
title_sort assessing motivation to change in eating disorders: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-38
work_keys_str_mv AT hoetzelkatrin assessingmotivationtochangeineatingdisordersasystematicreview
AT vonbrachelruth assessingmotivationtochangeineatingdisordersasystematicreview
AT schlossmacherlena assessingmotivationtochangeineatingdisordersasystematicreview
AT vockssilja assessingmotivationtochangeineatingdisordersasystematicreview