Cargando…
A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
BACKGROUND: Clear evidence based guidelines on the best and safest method of achieving and maintaining normal body weight during inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) are currently not available. Oral feeding with food alone, high-energy liquid supplements, nasogastric feeding and parenteral...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-36 |
_version_ | 1782324157797629952 |
---|---|
author | Hart, Susan Franklin, Richard C Russell, Janice Abraham, Suzanne |
author_facet | Hart, Susan Franklin, Richard C Russell, Janice Abraham, Suzanne |
author_sort | Hart, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clear evidence based guidelines on the best and safest method of achieving and maintaining normal body weight during inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) are currently not available. Oral feeding with food alone, high-energy liquid supplements, nasogastric feeding and parenteral nutrition all have the potential to achieve weight gain in the treatment of AN but the advantages and disadvantages of each method have not been comprehensively evaluated. A literature search was undertaken to identify papers describing feeding methods used during inpatient treatment of AN. The selection criteria searched for papers that described the feeding method; and reported weight change variables such as admission and discharge weight in kilograms, or Body Mass Index; or weight change over the course of inpatient treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-six papers were identified, describing a total of 37 samples with a mean sample size of 58.9 participants, and a range from 6 to 318. The majority (84.6%) of papers were observational cohorts and retrospective chart reviews. The most common feeding method described was nasogastric feeding and food, then high-energy liquid supplements and food. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on the efficacy of feeding methods used in the refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN, therefore no conclusion can be made about the most effective method of achieving weight gain during inpatient treatment. While there are a number of papers exploring this issue there is no consistency in the way the information is reported to enable comparisons between the different methods. There is an urgent need for research in this area to guide decision-making in the inpatient management, refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4081821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40818212014-07-05 A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa Hart, Susan Franklin, Richard C Russell, Janice Abraham, Suzanne J Eat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Clear evidence based guidelines on the best and safest method of achieving and maintaining normal body weight during inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) are currently not available. Oral feeding with food alone, high-energy liquid supplements, nasogastric feeding and parenteral nutrition all have the potential to achieve weight gain in the treatment of AN but the advantages and disadvantages of each method have not been comprehensively evaluated. A literature search was undertaken to identify papers describing feeding methods used during inpatient treatment of AN. The selection criteria searched for papers that described the feeding method; and reported weight change variables such as admission and discharge weight in kilograms, or Body Mass Index; or weight change over the course of inpatient treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-six papers were identified, describing a total of 37 samples with a mean sample size of 58.9 participants, and a range from 6 to 318. The majority (84.6%) of papers were observational cohorts and retrospective chart reviews. The most common feeding method described was nasogastric feeding and food, then high-energy liquid supplements and food. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on the efficacy of feeding methods used in the refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN, therefore no conclusion can be made about the most effective method of achieving weight gain during inpatient treatment. While there are a number of papers exploring this issue there is no consistency in the way the information is reported to enable comparisons between the different methods. There is an urgent need for research in this area to guide decision-making in the inpatient management, refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN. BioMed Central 2013-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4081821/ /pubmed/24999415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-36 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hart, Susan Franklin, Richard C Russell, Janice Abraham, Suzanne A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
title | A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
title_full | A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
title_fullStr | A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
title_short | A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
title_sort | review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartsusan areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT franklinrichardc areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT russelljanice areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT abrahamsuzanne areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT hartsusan reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT franklinrichardc reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT russelljanice reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa AT abrahamsuzanne reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa |