Cargando…

A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa

BACKGROUND: Clear evidence based guidelines on the best and safest method of achieving and maintaining normal body weight during inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) are currently not available. Oral feeding with food alone, high-energy liquid supplements, nasogastric feeding and parenteral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Susan, Franklin, Richard C, Russell, Janice, Abraham, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-36
_version_ 1782324157797629952
author Hart, Susan
Franklin, Richard C
Russell, Janice
Abraham, Suzanne
author_facet Hart, Susan
Franklin, Richard C
Russell, Janice
Abraham, Suzanne
author_sort Hart, Susan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clear evidence based guidelines on the best and safest method of achieving and maintaining normal body weight during inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) are currently not available. Oral feeding with food alone, high-energy liquid supplements, nasogastric feeding and parenteral nutrition all have the potential to achieve weight gain in the treatment of AN but the advantages and disadvantages of each method have not been comprehensively evaluated. A literature search was undertaken to identify papers describing feeding methods used during inpatient treatment of AN. The selection criteria searched for papers that described the feeding method; and reported weight change variables such as admission and discharge weight in kilograms, or Body Mass Index; or weight change over the course of inpatient treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-six papers were identified, describing a total of 37 samples with a mean sample size of 58.9 participants, and a range from 6 to 318. The majority (84.6%) of papers were observational cohorts and retrospective chart reviews. The most common feeding method described was nasogastric feeding and food, then high-energy liquid supplements and food. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on the efficacy of feeding methods used in the refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN, therefore no conclusion can be made about the most effective method of achieving weight gain during inpatient treatment. While there are a number of papers exploring this issue there is no consistency in the way the information is reported to enable comparisons between the different methods. There is an urgent need for research in this area to guide decision-making in the inpatient management, refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4081821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40818212014-07-05 A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa Hart, Susan Franklin, Richard C Russell, Janice Abraham, Suzanne J Eat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Clear evidence based guidelines on the best and safest method of achieving and maintaining normal body weight during inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) are currently not available. Oral feeding with food alone, high-energy liquid supplements, nasogastric feeding and parenteral nutrition all have the potential to achieve weight gain in the treatment of AN but the advantages and disadvantages of each method have not been comprehensively evaluated. A literature search was undertaken to identify papers describing feeding methods used during inpatient treatment of AN. The selection criteria searched for papers that described the feeding method; and reported weight change variables such as admission and discharge weight in kilograms, or Body Mass Index; or weight change over the course of inpatient treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-six papers were identified, describing a total of 37 samples with a mean sample size of 58.9 participants, and a range from 6 to 318. The majority (84.6%) of papers were observational cohorts and retrospective chart reviews. The most common feeding method described was nasogastric feeding and food, then high-energy liquid supplements and food. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on the efficacy of feeding methods used in the refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN, therefore no conclusion can be made about the most effective method of achieving weight gain during inpatient treatment. While there are a number of papers exploring this issue there is no consistency in the way the information is reported to enable comparisons between the different methods. There is an urgent need for research in this area to guide decision-making in the inpatient management, refeeding and nutritional rehabilitation of AN. BioMed Central 2013-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4081821/ /pubmed/24999415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-36 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hart, Susan
Franklin, Richard C
Russell, Janice
Abraham, Suzanne
A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
title A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
title_full A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
title_fullStr A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
title_full_unstemmed A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
title_short A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
title_sort review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-36
work_keys_str_mv AT hartsusan areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT franklinrichardc areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT russelljanice areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT abrahamsuzanne areviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT hartsusan reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT franklinrichardc reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT russelljanice reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa
AT abrahamsuzanne reviewoffeedingmethodsusedinthetreatmentofanorexianervosa