Cargando…
Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements
BACKGROUND: Control of reaching movements for manual work, vehicle operation, or interactions with manual interfaces requires concurrent gaze control for visual guidance of the hand. We hypothesize that reaching movements are based on negotiated strategies to resolve possible conflicting demands pla...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24920401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-102 |
_version_ | 1782324223072534528 |
---|---|
author | Kim, K Han Gillespie, R Brent Martin, Bernard J |
author_facet | Kim, K Han Gillespie, R Brent Martin, Bernard J |
author_sort | Kim, K Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Control of reaching movements for manual work, vehicle operation, or interactions with manual interfaces requires concurrent gaze control for visual guidance of the hand. We hypothesize that reaching movements are based on negotiated strategies to resolve possible conflicting demands placed on body segments shared by the visual (gaze) and manual (hand) control systems. Further, we hypothesize that a multiplicity of possible spatial configurations (redundancy) in a movement system enables a resolution of conflicting demands that does not require sacrificing the goals of the two systems. METHODS: The simultaneous control of manual reach and gaze during seated reaching movements was simulated by solving an inverse kinematics model wherein joint trajectories were estimated from a set of recorded hand and head movements. A secondary objective function, termed negotiation function, was introduced to describe a means for the manual reach and gaze directing systems to balance independent goals against (possibly competing) demands for shared resources, namely the torso movement. For both systems, the trade-off may be resolved without sacrificing goal achievement by taking advantage of redundant degrees of freedom. Estimated joint trajectories were then compared to joint movement recordings from ten participants. Joint angles were predicted with and without the negotiation function in place, and model accuracy was determined using the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and differences between estimated and recorded joint angles. RESULTS: The prediction accuracy was generally improved when negotiation was included: the negotiated control reduced RMSE by 16% and 30% on average when compared to the systems with only manual or visual control, respectively. Furthermore, the RMSE in the negotiated control system tended to improve with torso movement amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model describes how multiple systems cooperate to perform goal-directed human movements when those movements draw upon shared resources. Allocation of shared resources can be undertaken by a negotiation process that is aware of redundancies and the existence of multiple solutions within the individual systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4082178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40821782014-07-18 Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements Kim, K Han Gillespie, R Brent Martin, Bernard J J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Control of reaching movements for manual work, vehicle operation, or interactions with manual interfaces requires concurrent gaze control for visual guidance of the hand. We hypothesize that reaching movements are based on negotiated strategies to resolve possible conflicting demands placed on body segments shared by the visual (gaze) and manual (hand) control systems. Further, we hypothesize that a multiplicity of possible spatial configurations (redundancy) in a movement system enables a resolution of conflicting demands that does not require sacrificing the goals of the two systems. METHODS: The simultaneous control of manual reach and gaze during seated reaching movements was simulated by solving an inverse kinematics model wherein joint trajectories were estimated from a set of recorded hand and head movements. A secondary objective function, termed negotiation function, was introduced to describe a means for the manual reach and gaze directing systems to balance independent goals against (possibly competing) demands for shared resources, namely the torso movement. For both systems, the trade-off may be resolved without sacrificing goal achievement by taking advantage of redundant degrees of freedom. Estimated joint trajectories were then compared to joint movement recordings from ten participants. Joint angles were predicted with and without the negotiation function in place, and model accuracy was determined using the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and differences between estimated and recorded joint angles. RESULTS: The prediction accuracy was generally improved when negotiation was included: the negotiated control reduced RMSE by 16% and 30% on average when compared to the systems with only manual or visual control, respectively. Furthermore, the RMSE in the negotiated control system tended to improve with torso movement amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model describes how multiple systems cooperate to perform goal-directed human movements when those movements draw upon shared resources. Allocation of shared resources can be undertaken by a negotiation process that is aware of redundancies and the existence of multiple solutions within the individual systems. BioMed Central 2014-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4082178/ /pubmed/24920401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-102 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kim, K Han Gillespie, R Brent Martin, Bernard J Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
title | Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
title_full | Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
title_fullStr | Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
title_full_unstemmed | Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
title_short | Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
title_sort | negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24920401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkhan negotiatedcontrolbetweenthemanualandvisualsystemsforvisuallyguidedhandreachingmovements AT gillespierbrent negotiatedcontrolbetweenthemanualandvisualsystemsforvisuallyguidedhandreachingmovements AT martinbernardj negotiatedcontrolbetweenthemanualandvisualsystemsforvisuallyguidedhandreachingmovements |