Cargando…

Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling

Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaghlool, Shaza B., Wyatt, Christopher L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00191
_version_ 1782324224934805504
author Zaghlool, Shaza B.
Wyatt, Christopher L.
author_facet Zaghlool, Shaza B.
Wyatt, Christopher L.
author_sort Zaghlool, Shaza B.
collection PubMed
description Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. This paper proposes a solution to this problem by treating missing regions in the first-level analysis as missing data, and performing estimation of the time course associated with any missing region using one of four candidate methods: zero-filling, average-filling, noise-filling using a fixed stochastic process, or one estimated using expectation-maximization. The effect of this estimation scheme was analyzed by treating it as a preprocessing step to DCM and observing the resulting effects on model evidence. Simulation studies show that estimation using expectation-maximization yields the highest classification accuracy using a simple loss function and highest model evidence, relative to other methods. This result held for various dataset sizes and varying numbers of model choice. In real data, application to Go/No-Go and Simon tasks allowed computation of signals from the missing nodes and the consequent computation of model evidence in all subjects compared to 62 and 48 percent respectively if no preprocessing was performed. These results demonstrate the face validity of the preprocessing scheme and open the possibility of using single-subject DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40821892014-07-28 Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling Zaghlool, Shaza B. Wyatt, Christopher L. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. This paper proposes a solution to this problem by treating missing regions in the first-level analysis as missing data, and performing estimation of the time course associated with any missing region using one of four candidate methods: zero-filling, average-filling, noise-filling using a fixed stochastic process, or one estimated using expectation-maximization. The effect of this estimation scheme was analyzed by treating it as a preprocessing step to DCM and observing the resulting effects on model evidence. Simulation studies show that estimation using expectation-maximization yields the highest classification accuracy using a simple loss function and highest model evidence, relative to other methods. This result held for various dataset sizes and varying numbers of model choice. In real data, application to Go/No-Go and Simon tasks allowed computation of signals from the missing nodes and the consequent computation of model evidence in all subjects compared to 62 and 48 percent respectively if no preprocessing was performed. These results demonstrate the face validity of the preprocessing scheme and open the possibility of using single-subject DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4082189/ /pubmed/25071435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00191 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zaghlool and Wyatt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zaghlool, Shaza B.
Wyatt, Christopher L.
Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling
title Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling
title_full Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling
title_fullStr Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling
title_full_unstemmed Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling
title_short Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling
title_sort missing data estimation in fmri dynamic causal modeling
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00191
work_keys_str_mv AT zaghloolshazab missingdataestimationinfmridynamiccausalmodeling
AT wyattchristopherl missingdataestimationinfmridynamiccausalmodeling