Cargando…

Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan

BACKGROUND: Empowerment is essential for gender equity and health. The city of Malmö, Sweden, has formulated a development plan for gender equity integration (GEIDP). A ‘Policy Empowerment Index’ (PEI) was previously developed to assess the empowerment potential of policies. OBJECTIVES: To pilot-eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavriilidis, Georgios, Gavriilidou, Nivetha Natarajan, Pettersson, Erika, Renhammar, Eva, Balkfors, Anna, Östergren, Per-Olof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24993349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23710
_version_ 1782324225604845568
author Gavriilidis, Georgios
Gavriilidou, Nivetha Natarajan
Pettersson, Erika
Renhammar, Eva
Balkfors, Anna
Östergren, Per-Olof
author_facet Gavriilidis, Georgios
Gavriilidou, Nivetha Natarajan
Pettersson, Erika
Renhammar, Eva
Balkfors, Anna
Östergren, Per-Olof
author_sort Gavriilidis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Empowerment is essential for gender equity and health. The city of Malmö, Sweden, has formulated a development plan for gender equity integration (GEIDP). A ‘Policy Empowerment Index’ (PEI) was previously developed to assess the empowerment potential of policies. OBJECTIVES: To pilot-evaluate the GEIDP’s potential for empowerment and to test the PEI for future policy evaluations. DESIGN: The GEIDP was analyzed and scored according to electronically retrieved evidence on constituent opinion, participation, capacity development, evaluation–adaptation, and impact. RESULTS: The plan’s PEI score was 64% (CI: 48–78) and was classified as ‘enabling’, ranging between ‘enabling’ and ‘supportive’. The plan’s strengths were: 1) constituent knowledge and concern; 2) peripheral implementation; 3) protection of vulnerable groups; and 4) evaluation/adaptation procedures. It scored average on: 1) policy agenda setting; 2) planning; 3) provisions for education; 4) network formation; 5) resource mobilization. The weakest point was regarding promotion of employment and entrepreneurship. CONCLUSIONS: The PEI evaluation highlighted the plan’s potential of constituency empowerment and proposed how it could be augmented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40821922014-07-11 Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan Gavriilidis, Georgios Gavriilidou, Nivetha Natarajan Pettersson, Erika Renhammar, Eva Balkfors, Anna Östergren, Per-Olof Glob Health Action Gender and Health BACKGROUND: Empowerment is essential for gender equity and health. The city of Malmö, Sweden, has formulated a development plan for gender equity integration (GEIDP). A ‘Policy Empowerment Index’ (PEI) was previously developed to assess the empowerment potential of policies. OBJECTIVES: To pilot-evaluate the GEIDP’s potential for empowerment and to test the PEI for future policy evaluations. DESIGN: The GEIDP was analyzed and scored according to electronically retrieved evidence on constituent opinion, participation, capacity development, evaluation–adaptation, and impact. RESULTS: The plan’s PEI score was 64% (CI: 48–78) and was classified as ‘enabling’, ranging between ‘enabling’ and ‘supportive’. The plan’s strengths were: 1) constituent knowledge and concern; 2) peripheral implementation; 3) protection of vulnerable groups; and 4) evaluation/adaptation procedures. It scored average on: 1) policy agenda setting; 2) planning; 3) provisions for education; 4) network formation; 5) resource mobilization. The weakest point was regarding promotion of employment and entrepreneurship. CONCLUSIONS: The PEI evaluation highlighted the plan’s potential of constituency empowerment and proposed how it could be augmented. Co-Action Publishing 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4082192/ /pubmed/24993349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23710 Text en © 2014 Georgios Gavriilidis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gender and Health
Gavriilidis, Georgios
Gavriilidou, Nivetha Natarajan
Pettersson, Erika
Renhammar, Eva
Balkfors, Anna
Östergren, Per-Olof
Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan
title Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan
title_full Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan
title_fullStr Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan
title_full_unstemmed Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan
title_short Empowerment evaluation of a Swedish gender equity plan
title_sort empowerment evaluation of a swedish gender equity plan
topic Gender and Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24993349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23710
work_keys_str_mv AT gavriilidisgeorgios empowermentevaluationofaswedishgenderequityplan
AT gavriilidounivethanatarajan empowermentevaluationofaswedishgenderequityplan
AT petterssonerika empowermentevaluationofaswedishgenderequityplan
AT renhammareva empowermentevaluationofaswedishgenderequityplan
AT balkforsanna empowermentevaluationofaswedishgenderequityplan
AT ostergrenperolof empowermentevaluationofaswedishgenderequityplan