Cargando…

How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND: The impact of non-commercial producers on disease spread via livestock movement is related to their level of interaction with other commercial actors within the industry. Although understanding these relationships is crucial in order to identify likely routes of disease incursion and tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porphyre, Thibaud, Boden, Lisa A, Correia-Gomes, Carla, Auty, Harriet K, Gunn, George J, Woolhouse, Mark EJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24965915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-140
_version_ 1782324254690246656
author Porphyre, Thibaud
Boden, Lisa A
Correia-Gomes, Carla
Auty, Harriet K
Gunn, George J
Woolhouse, Mark EJ
author_facet Porphyre, Thibaud
Boden, Lisa A
Correia-Gomes, Carla
Auty, Harriet K
Gunn, George J
Woolhouse, Mark EJ
author_sort Porphyre, Thibaud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of non-commercial producers on disease spread via livestock movement is related to their level of interaction with other commercial actors within the industry. Although understanding these relationships is crucial in order to identify likely routes of disease incursion and transmission prior to disease detection, there has been little research in this area due to the difficulties of capturing movements of small producers with sufficient resolution. Here, we used the Scottish Livestock Electronic Identification and Traceability (ScotEID) database to describe the movement patterns of different pig production systems which may affect the risk of disease spread within the swine industry. In particular, we focused on the role of small pig producers. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and May 2013, 23,169 batches of pigs were recorded moving animals between 2382 known unique premises. Although the majority of movements (61%) were to a slaughterhouse, the non-commercial and the commercial sectors of the Scottish swine industry coexist, with on- and off-movement of animals occurring relatively frequently. For instance, 13% and 4% of non-slaughter movements from professional producers were sent to a non-assured commercial producer or to a small producer, respectively; whereas 43% and 22% of movements from non-assured commercial farms were sent to a professional or a small producer, respectively. We further identified differences between producer types in several animal movement characteristics which are known to increase the risk of disease spread. Particularly, the distance travelled and the use of haulage were found to be significantly different between producers. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that commercial producers are not isolated from the non-commercial sector of the Scottish swine industry and may frequently interact, either directly or indirectly. The observed patterns in the frequency of movements, the type of producers involved, the distance travelled and the use of haulage companies provide insights into the structure of the Scottish swine industry, but also highlight different features that may increase the risk of infectious diseases spread in both Scotland and the UK. Such knowledge is critical for developing more robust biosecurity and surveillance plans and better preparing Scotland against incursions of emerging swine diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40824162014-07-18 How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis Porphyre, Thibaud Boden, Lisa A Correia-Gomes, Carla Auty, Harriet K Gunn, George J Woolhouse, Mark EJ BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of non-commercial producers on disease spread via livestock movement is related to their level of interaction with other commercial actors within the industry. Although understanding these relationships is crucial in order to identify likely routes of disease incursion and transmission prior to disease detection, there has been little research in this area due to the difficulties of capturing movements of small producers with sufficient resolution. Here, we used the Scottish Livestock Electronic Identification and Traceability (ScotEID) database to describe the movement patterns of different pig production systems which may affect the risk of disease spread within the swine industry. In particular, we focused on the role of small pig producers. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and May 2013, 23,169 batches of pigs were recorded moving animals between 2382 known unique premises. Although the majority of movements (61%) were to a slaughterhouse, the non-commercial and the commercial sectors of the Scottish swine industry coexist, with on- and off-movement of animals occurring relatively frequently. For instance, 13% and 4% of non-slaughter movements from professional producers were sent to a non-assured commercial producer or to a small producer, respectively; whereas 43% and 22% of movements from non-assured commercial farms were sent to a professional or a small producer, respectively. We further identified differences between producer types in several animal movement characteristics which are known to increase the risk of disease spread. Particularly, the distance travelled and the use of haulage were found to be significantly different between producers. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that commercial producers are not isolated from the non-commercial sector of the Scottish swine industry and may frequently interact, either directly or indirectly. The observed patterns in the frequency of movements, the type of producers involved, the distance travelled and the use of haulage companies provide insights into the structure of the Scottish swine industry, but also highlight different features that may increase the risk of infectious diseases spread in both Scotland and the UK. Such knowledge is critical for developing more robust biosecurity and surveillance plans and better preparing Scotland against incursions of emerging swine diseases. BioMed Central 2014-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4082416/ /pubmed/24965915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-140 Text en Copyright © 2014 Porphyre et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Porphyre, Thibaud
Boden, Lisa A
Correia-Gomes, Carla
Auty, Harriet K
Gunn, George J
Woolhouse, Mark EJ
How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
title How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
title_full How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
title_fullStr How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
title_full_unstemmed How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
title_short How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
title_sort how commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24965915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-140
work_keys_str_mv AT porphyrethibaud howcommercialandnoncommercialswineproducersmovepigsinscotlandadetaileddescriptiveanalysis
AT bodenlisaa howcommercialandnoncommercialswineproducersmovepigsinscotlandadetaileddescriptiveanalysis
AT correiagomescarla howcommercialandnoncommercialswineproducersmovepigsinscotlandadetaileddescriptiveanalysis
AT autyharrietk howcommercialandnoncommercialswineproducersmovepigsinscotlandadetaileddescriptiveanalysis
AT gunngeorgej howcommercialandnoncommercialswineproducersmovepigsinscotlandadetaileddescriptiveanalysis
AT woolhousemarkej howcommercialandnoncommercialswineproducersmovepigsinscotlandadetaileddescriptiveanalysis