Cargando…

Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations

BACKGROUND: Vector-borne disease transmission is dependent on the many nuances of the contact event between infectious and susceptible hosts. Virus acquisition from a viremic human to a susceptible mosquito is often assumed to be nearly perfect and almost always uniform across the infectious period....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christofferson, Rebecca C, Mores, Christopher N, Wearing, Helen J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-282
_version_ 1782324259950952448
author Christofferson, Rebecca C
Mores, Christopher N
Wearing, Helen J
author_facet Christofferson, Rebecca C
Mores, Christopher N
Wearing, Helen J
author_sort Christofferson, Rebecca C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vector-borne disease transmission is dependent on the many nuances of the contact event between infectious and susceptible hosts. Virus acquisition from a viremic human to a susceptible mosquito is often assumed to be nearly perfect and almost always uniform across the infectious period. Dengue transmission models that have previously addressed variability in human to vector transmission dynamics do not account for the variation in infectiousness of a single individual, and subsequent infection of naïve mosquitoes. Understanding the contribution of this variability in human infectiousness is especially important in the context of introduction events where an infected individual carries the virus into a population of competent vectors. Furthermore, it could affect the ability to detect an epidemic (and the timing of detection) following introduction. METHODS: We constructed a stochastic, compartmental model to describe the heterogeneity of human viremia and calculate the probability of a successful introduction, taking into account the viremia level (and thus acquisition potential) of the index case on, and after, the day of introduction into a susceptible population and varying contact rates between the human and mosquito populations. We then compared the results of this model with those generated by a simpler model that has the same average infectiousness but only a single infectious class. RESULTS: We found that the infectivity of the index case as well as the contact rate affected the probability of emergence, but that contact rate had the most significant effect. We also found that the interaction between contact rate and the infectiousness of the index case affected the time to detection relative to the peak of the epidemic curve. Additionally, when compared to our model that accounts for variable infectiousness, a model with a single infectious class underestimates the probability of emergence and transmission intensity. CONCLUSION: Understanding the interplay between individual human heterogeneity of infectiousness and the rate of contact with the vector population will be important when predicting the likelihood, detection, and magnitude of an outbreak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40824892014-07-18 Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations Christofferson, Rebecca C Mores, Christopher N Wearing, Helen J Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Vector-borne disease transmission is dependent on the many nuances of the contact event between infectious and susceptible hosts. Virus acquisition from a viremic human to a susceptible mosquito is often assumed to be nearly perfect and almost always uniform across the infectious period. Dengue transmission models that have previously addressed variability in human to vector transmission dynamics do not account for the variation in infectiousness of a single individual, and subsequent infection of naïve mosquitoes. Understanding the contribution of this variability in human infectiousness is especially important in the context of introduction events where an infected individual carries the virus into a population of competent vectors. Furthermore, it could affect the ability to detect an epidemic (and the timing of detection) following introduction. METHODS: We constructed a stochastic, compartmental model to describe the heterogeneity of human viremia and calculate the probability of a successful introduction, taking into account the viremia level (and thus acquisition potential) of the index case on, and after, the day of introduction into a susceptible population and varying contact rates between the human and mosquito populations. We then compared the results of this model with those generated by a simpler model that has the same average infectiousness but only a single infectious class. RESULTS: We found that the infectivity of the index case as well as the contact rate affected the probability of emergence, but that contact rate had the most significant effect. We also found that the interaction between contact rate and the infectiousness of the index case affected the time to detection relative to the peak of the epidemic curve. Additionally, when compared to our model that accounts for variable infectiousness, a model with a single infectious class underestimates the probability of emergence and transmission intensity. CONCLUSION: Understanding the interplay between individual human heterogeneity of infectiousness and the rate of contact with the vector population will be important when predicting the likelihood, detection, and magnitude of an outbreak. BioMed Central 2014-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4082489/ /pubmed/24957139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-282 Text en Copyright © 2014 Christofferson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Christofferson, Rebecca C
Mores, Christopher N
Wearing, Helen J
Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
title Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
title_full Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
title_fullStr Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
title_short Characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
title_sort characterizing the likelihood of dengue emergence and detection in naïve populations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-282
work_keys_str_mv AT christoffersonrebeccac characterizingthelikelihoodofdengueemergenceanddetectioninnaivepopulations
AT moreschristophern characterizingthelikelihoodofdengueemergenceanddetectioninnaivepopulations
AT wearinghelenj characterizingthelikelihoodofdengueemergenceanddetectioninnaivepopulations