Cargando…

The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in patients with previous negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with at least 1 previous negative TRUS prostate biopsy underwent mp-MRI in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed, Ahmed, Hashim U., Arya, Manit, Charman, Susan C., Anastasiadis, Eleni, Freeman, Alex, Emberton, Mark, Kirkham, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24055430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.06.007
_version_ 1782324269165838336
author Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Arya, Manit
Charman, Susan C.
Anastasiadis, Eleni
Freeman, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Kirkham, Alex
author_facet Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Arya, Manit
Charman, Susan C.
Anastasiadis, Eleni
Freeman, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Kirkham, Alex
author_sort Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in patients with previous negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with at least 1 previous negative TRUS prostate biopsy underwent mp-MRI in the form of T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. This was followed by transperineal template systematic prostate biopsies. Analysis was done based on 2 sectors per prostate, right and left (108 sectors out of 54 prostates). mp-MRI was scored using an ordinal scale 1 to 5 based on the suspicion of the presence of clinically significant disease. We used 6 different definitions for clinically significant disease and tested the performance of mp-MRI at each single definition. RESULTS: Median age was 64 (range, 39–75), median PSA level was 10 (range, 2–23), and median number of biopsies was 45 (range, 21–137). Cancer of any volume and any grade was detected in 34 of 54 (63%) patients. mp-MRI accuracy at detection of clinically significant cancer using University College London (UCL) definition 2 (any Gleason score of 4 or maximum cancer core length of ≥4 mm or both) showed sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 42%, positive predictive value of 38%, and negative predictive value of 79%. For a different definition of significant tumor (UCL definition 1; dominant Gleason score 4 or maximum cancer core length ≥6 mm or both), the sensitivity was 90%, specificity 42%, positive predictive value 26%, and negative predictive value 95%. CONCLUSIONS: mp-MRI showed good performance at both detection and ruling out clinically significant disease, according to the definition used. mp-MRI can then be used as a triage test in the population with persistently elevated or rising PSA levels to select patients that can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40825332014-07-09 The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed Ahmed, Hashim U. Arya, Manit Charman, Susan C. Anastasiadis, Eleni Freeman, Alex Emberton, Mark Kirkham, Alex Urol Oncol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in patients with previous negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with at least 1 previous negative TRUS prostate biopsy underwent mp-MRI in the form of T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. This was followed by transperineal template systematic prostate biopsies. Analysis was done based on 2 sectors per prostate, right and left (108 sectors out of 54 prostates). mp-MRI was scored using an ordinal scale 1 to 5 based on the suspicion of the presence of clinically significant disease. We used 6 different definitions for clinically significant disease and tested the performance of mp-MRI at each single definition. RESULTS: Median age was 64 (range, 39–75), median PSA level was 10 (range, 2–23), and median number of biopsies was 45 (range, 21–137). Cancer of any volume and any grade was detected in 34 of 54 (63%) patients. mp-MRI accuracy at detection of clinically significant cancer using University College London (UCL) definition 2 (any Gleason score of 4 or maximum cancer core length of ≥4 mm or both) showed sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 42%, positive predictive value of 38%, and negative predictive value of 79%. For a different definition of significant tumor (UCL definition 1; dominant Gleason score 4 or maximum cancer core length ≥6 mm or both), the sensitivity was 90%, specificity 42%, positive predictive value 26%, and negative predictive value 95%. CONCLUSIONS: mp-MRI showed good performance at both detection and ruling out clinically significant disease, according to the definition used. mp-MRI can then be used as a triage test in the population with persistently elevated or rising PSA levels to select patients that can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy. Elsevier 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4082533/ /pubmed/24055430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.06.007 Text en © 2014 Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Arya, Manit
Charman, Susan C.
Anastasiadis, Eleni
Freeman, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Kirkham, Alex
The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
title The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
title_full The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
title_fullStr The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
title_short The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
title_sort accuracy of multiparametric mri in men with negative biopsy and elevated psa level—can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24055430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.06.007
work_keys_str_mv AT abdalazeezmohamed theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT ahmedhashimu theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT aryamanit theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT charmansusanc theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT anastasiadiseleni theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT freemanalex theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT embertonmark theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT kirkhamalex theaccuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT abdalazeezmohamed accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT ahmedhashimu accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT aryamanit accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT charmansusanc accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT anastasiadiseleni accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT freemanalex accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT embertonmark accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer
AT kirkhamalex accuracyofmultiparametricmriinmenwithnegativebiopsyandelevatedpsalevelcanitruleoutclinicallysignificantprostatecancer