Cargando…
Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review
BACKGROUND: Observational studies dominate the surgical literature. Statistical adjustment is an important strategy to account for confounders in observational studies. Research has shown that published articles are often poor in statistical quality, which may jeopardize their conclusions. The Stati...
Autores principales: | Wu, Robert, Glen, Peter, Ramsay, Tim, Martel, Guillaume |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24972453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-70 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting of Model Performance and Statistical Methods in Studies That Use Machine Learning to Develop Clinical Prediction Models: Protocol for a Systematic Review
por: Weaver, Colin George Wyllie, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Quality of patient-reported and proxy-reported outcomes for children with impairment of the lower extremity: systematic review protocol
por: Saris, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing liver resection: a systematic review protocol
por: Bennett, Sean, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Mobile tablet-based therapies following stroke: a systematic scoping review protocol of attempted interventions and the challenges encountered
por: Pugliese, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2017)