Cargando…

The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a single non-invasive method in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and to deduce its clinical utility. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant original studies. Quality of includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jie, Chen, Rongbo, Liu, Ping, Tan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24865693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2
_version_ 1782324280624676864
author Jie, Chen
Rongbo, Liu
Ping, Tan
author_facet Jie, Chen
Rongbo, Liu
Ping, Tan
author_sort Jie, Chen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a single non-invasive method in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and to deduce its clinical utility. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant original studies. Quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). Data were extracted to calculate sensitivity and specificity as well as running the test of heterogeneity and threshold effect. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was drawn and area under SROC curve (AUC) served as a determination of the diagnostic performance of DWI for the detection of PCa. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included, with 27 subsets of data available for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) were 0.62 (95 % CI 0.61–0.64) and 0.90 (95 % CI 0.89–0.90), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 5.83 (95 % CI 4.61–7.37) and 0.30 (95 % CI 0.23–0.39), respectively. The AUC was 0.8991. Significant heterogeneity was observed. There was no notable publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: DWI is an informative MRI modality in detecting PCa and shows moderately high diagnostic accuracy. General clinical application was limited because of the absence of standardized DW-MRI techniques. KEY POINTS: • DWI provides incremental information for the detection and evaluation of PCa • DWI has moderately high diagnostic accuracy in detecting PCa • Patient condition, imaging protocols and study design positively influence diagnostic performance • General clinical application requires optimization of image acquisition and interpretation
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40826522014-07-10 The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis Jie, Chen Rongbo, Liu Ping, Tan Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a single non-invasive method in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and to deduce its clinical utility. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant original studies. Quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). Data were extracted to calculate sensitivity and specificity as well as running the test of heterogeneity and threshold effect. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was drawn and area under SROC curve (AUC) served as a determination of the diagnostic performance of DWI for the detection of PCa. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included, with 27 subsets of data available for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) were 0.62 (95 % CI 0.61–0.64) and 0.90 (95 % CI 0.89–0.90), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 5.83 (95 % CI 4.61–7.37) and 0.30 (95 % CI 0.23–0.39), respectively. The AUC was 0.8991. Significant heterogeneity was observed. There was no notable publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: DWI is an informative MRI modality in detecting PCa and shows moderately high diagnostic accuracy. General clinical application was limited because of the absence of standardized DW-MRI techniques. KEY POINTS: • DWI provides incremental information for the detection and evaluation of PCa • DWI has moderately high diagnostic accuracy in detecting PCa • Patient condition, imaging protocols and study design positively influence diagnostic performance • General clinical application requires optimization of image acquisition and interpretation Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-05-28 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4082652/ /pubmed/24865693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Jie, Chen
Rongbo, Liu
Ping, Tan
The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24865693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jiechen thevalueofdiffusionweightedimaginginthedetectionofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT rongboliu thevalueofdiffusionweightedimaginginthedetectionofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT pingtan thevalueofdiffusionweightedimaginginthedetectionofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT jiechen valueofdiffusionweightedimaginginthedetectionofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT rongboliu valueofdiffusionweightedimaginginthedetectionofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT pingtan valueofdiffusionweightedimaginginthedetectionofprostatecancerametaanalysis