Cargando…
A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
BACKGROUND: Brain retraction causes great distortion that limits the accuracy of an image-guided neurosurgery system that uses preoperative images. Therefore, brain retraction correction is an important intraoperative clinical application. METHODS: We used a linear elastic biomechanical model, which...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0958-8 |
_version_ | 1782324280859557888 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ping Wang, Weiwei Song, Zhijian An, Yong Zhang, Chenxi |
author_facet | Li, Ping Wang, Weiwei Song, Zhijian An, Yong Zhang, Chenxi |
author_sort | Li, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brain retraction causes great distortion that limits the accuracy of an image-guided neurosurgery system that uses preoperative images. Therefore, brain retraction correction is an important intraoperative clinical application. METHODS: We used a linear elastic biomechanical model, which deforms based on the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) within a framework for brain retraction correction. In particular, a laser range scanner was introduced to obtain a surface point cloud of the exposed surgical field including retractors inserted into the brain. A brain retraction surface tracking algorithm converted these point clouds into boundary conditions applied to XFEM modeling that drive brain deformation. To test the framework, we performed a brain phantom experiment involving the retraction of tissue. Pairs of the modified Hausdorff distance between Canny edges extracted from model-updated images, pre-retraction, and post-retraction CT images were compared to evaluate the morphological alignment of our framework. Furthermore, the measured displacements of beads embedded in the brain phantom and the predicted ones were compared to evaluate numerical performance. RESULTS: The modified Hausdorff distance of 19 pairs of images decreased from 1.10 to 0.76 mm. The forecast error of 23 stainless steel beads in the phantom was between 0 and 1.73 mm (mean 1.19 mm). The correction accuracy varied between 52.8 and 100 % (mean 81.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that the brain retraction compensation can be incorporated intraoperatively into the model-updating process in image-guided neurosurgery systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4082653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40826532014-07-10 A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner Li, Ping Wang, Weiwei Song, Zhijian An, Yong Zhang, Chenxi Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Brain retraction causes great distortion that limits the accuracy of an image-guided neurosurgery system that uses preoperative images. Therefore, brain retraction correction is an important intraoperative clinical application. METHODS: We used a linear elastic biomechanical model, which deforms based on the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) within a framework for brain retraction correction. In particular, a laser range scanner was introduced to obtain a surface point cloud of the exposed surgical field including retractors inserted into the brain. A brain retraction surface tracking algorithm converted these point clouds into boundary conditions applied to XFEM modeling that drive brain deformation. To test the framework, we performed a brain phantom experiment involving the retraction of tissue. Pairs of the modified Hausdorff distance between Canny edges extracted from model-updated images, pre-retraction, and post-retraction CT images were compared to evaluate the morphological alignment of our framework. Furthermore, the measured displacements of beads embedded in the brain phantom and the predicted ones were compared to evaluate numerical performance. RESULTS: The modified Hausdorff distance of 19 pairs of images decreased from 1.10 to 0.76 mm. The forecast error of 23 stainless steel beads in the phantom was between 0 and 1.73 mm (mean 1.19 mm). The correction accuracy varied between 52.8 and 100 % (mean 81.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that the brain retraction compensation can be incorporated intraoperatively into the model-updating process in image-guided neurosurgery systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-11-30 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4082653/ /pubmed/24293030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0958-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Ping Wang, Weiwei Song, Zhijian An, Yong Zhang, Chenxi A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner |
title | A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner |
title_full | A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner |
title_fullStr | A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner |
title_full_unstemmed | A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner |
title_short | A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner |
title_sort | framework for correcting brain retraction based on an extended finite element method using a laser range scanner |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0958-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liping aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT wangweiwei aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT songzhijian aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT anyong aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT zhangchenxi aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT liping frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT wangweiwei frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT songzhijian frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT anyong frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner AT zhangchenxi frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner |