Cargando…

A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner

BACKGROUND: Brain retraction causes great distortion that limits the accuracy of an image-guided neurosurgery system that uses preoperative images. Therefore, brain retraction correction is an important intraoperative clinical application. METHODS: We used a linear elastic biomechanical model, which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ping, Wang, Weiwei, Song, Zhijian, An, Yong, Zhang, Chenxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0958-8
_version_ 1782324280859557888
author Li, Ping
Wang, Weiwei
Song, Zhijian
An, Yong
Zhang, Chenxi
author_facet Li, Ping
Wang, Weiwei
Song, Zhijian
An, Yong
Zhang, Chenxi
author_sort Li, Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brain retraction causes great distortion that limits the accuracy of an image-guided neurosurgery system that uses preoperative images. Therefore, brain retraction correction is an important intraoperative clinical application. METHODS: We used a linear elastic biomechanical model, which deforms based on the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) within a framework for brain retraction correction. In particular, a laser range scanner was introduced to obtain a surface point cloud of the exposed surgical field including retractors inserted into the brain. A brain retraction surface tracking algorithm converted these point clouds into boundary conditions applied to XFEM modeling that drive brain deformation. To test the framework, we performed a brain phantom experiment involving the retraction of tissue. Pairs of the modified Hausdorff distance between Canny edges extracted from model-updated images, pre-retraction, and post-retraction CT images were compared to evaluate the morphological alignment of our framework. Furthermore, the measured displacements of beads embedded in the brain phantom and the predicted ones were compared to evaluate numerical performance. RESULTS: The modified Hausdorff distance of 19 pairs of images decreased from 1.10 to 0.76 mm. The forecast error of 23 stainless steel beads in the phantom was between 0 and 1.73 mm (mean 1.19 mm). The correction accuracy varied between 52.8 and 100 % (mean 81.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that the brain retraction compensation can be incorporated intraoperatively into the model-updating process in image-guided neurosurgery systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40826532014-07-10 A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner Li, Ping Wang, Weiwei Song, Zhijian An, Yong Zhang, Chenxi Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Brain retraction causes great distortion that limits the accuracy of an image-guided neurosurgery system that uses preoperative images. Therefore, brain retraction correction is an important intraoperative clinical application. METHODS: We used a linear elastic biomechanical model, which deforms based on the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) within a framework for brain retraction correction. In particular, a laser range scanner was introduced to obtain a surface point cloud of the exposed surgical field including retractors inserted into the brain. A brain retraction surface tracking algorithm converted these point clouds into boundary conditions applied to XFEM modeling that drive brain deformation. To test the framework, we performed a brain phantom experiment involving the retraction of tissue. Pairs of the modified Hausdorff distance between Canny edges extracted from model-updated images, pre-retraction, and post-retraction CT images were compared to evaluate the morphological alignment of our framework. Furthermore, the measured displacements of beads embedded in the brain phantom and the predicted ones were compared to evaluate numerical performance. RESULTS: The modified Hausdorff distance of 19 pairs of images decreased from 1.10 to 0.76 mm. The forecast error of 23 stainless steel beads in the phantom was between 0 and 1.73 mm (mean 1.19 mm). The correction accuracy varied between 52.8 and 100 % (mean 81.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that the brain retraction compensation can be incorporated intraoperatively into the model-updating process in image-guided neurosurgery systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-11-30 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4082653/ /pubmed/24293030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0958-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Ping
Wang, Weiwei
Song, Zhijian
An, Yong
Zhang, Chenxi
A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
title A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
title_full A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
title_fullStr A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
title_full_unstemmed A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
title_short A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner
title_sort framework for correcting brain retraction based on an extended finite element method using a laser range scanner
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0958-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liping aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT wangweiwei aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT songzhijian aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT anyong aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT zhangchenxi aframeworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT liping frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT wangweiwei frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT songzhijian frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT anyong frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner
AT zhangchenxi frameworkforcorrectingbrainretractionbasedonanextendedfiniteelementmethodusingalaserrangescanner