Cargando…

Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers

The diastolic function (i.e., blood filling) of the left ventricle (LV) is determined by its capacity for relaxation, or the decay in residual active tension (AT) generated during systole, and its constitutive material properties, or myocardial stiffness. The clinical determination of these two fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xi, Jiahe, Shi, Wenzhe, Rueckert, Daniel, Razavi, Reza, Smith, Nicolas P., Lamata, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0531-y
_version_ 1782324281550569472
author Xi, Jiahe
Shi, Wenzhe
Rueckert, Daniel
Razavi, Reza
Smith, Nicolas P.
Lamata, Pablo
author_facet Xi, Jiahe
Shi, Wenzhe
Rueckert, Daniel
Razavi, Reza
Smith, Nicolas P.
Lamata, Pablo
author_sort Xi, Jiahe
collection PubMed
description The diastolic function (i.e., blood filling) of the left ventricle (LV) is determined by its capacity for relaxation, or the decay in residual active tension (AT) generated during systole, and its constitutive material properties, or myocardial stiffness. The clinical determination of these two factors (diastolic residual AT and stiffness) is thus essential for assessing LV diastolic function. To quantify these two factors, in our previous work, a novel model-based parameter estimation approach was proposed and successfully applied to multiple cases using clinically acquired motion and invasively measured ventricular pressure data. However, the need to invasively acquire LV pressure limits the wide application of this approach. In this study, we address this issue by analyzing the feasibility of using two kinds of non-invasively available pressure measurements for the purpose of inverse mechanical parameter estimation. The prescription of pressure based on a generic pressure–volume (P–V) relationship reported in literature is first evaluated in a set of 18 clinical cases (10 healthy and 8 diseased), finding reasonable results for stiffness but not for residual active tension. We then investigate the use of non-invasive pressure measures, now available through imaging techniques and limited by unknown or biased offset values. Specifically, three sets of physiologically realistic synthetic data with three levels of diastolic residual active tension (i.e., impaired relaxation capability) are designed to quantify the percentage error in the parameter estimation against the possible pressure offsets within the physiological limits. Maximum errors are quantified as 11 % for the magnitude of stiffness and 22 % for AT, with averaged 0.17 kPa error in pressure measurement offset using the state-of-the-art non-invasive pressure estimation method. The main cause for these errors is the limited temporal resolution of clinical imaging data currently available. These results demonstrate the potential feasibility of the estimation diastolic biomarkers with non-invasive assessment of pressure through medical imaging data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4082656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40826562014-07-10 Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers Xi, Jiahe Shi, Wenzhe Rueckert, Daniel Razavi, Reza Smith, Nicolas P. Lamata, Pablo Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper The diastolic function (i.e., blood filling) of the left ventricle (LV) is determined by its capacity for relaxation, or the decay in residual active tension (AT) generated during systole, and its constitutive material properties, or myocardial stiffness. The clinical determination of these two factors (diastolic residual AT and stiffness) is thus essential for assessing LV diastolic function. To quantify these two factors, in our previous work, a novel model-based parameter estimation approach was proposed and successfully applied to multiple cases using clinically acquired motion and invasively measured ventricular pressure data. However, the need to invasively acquire LV pressure limits the wide application of this approach. In this study, we address this issue by analyzing the feasibility of using two kinds of non-invasively available pressure measurements for the purpose of inverse mechanical parameter estimation. The prescription of pressure based on a generic pressure–volume (P–V) relationship reported in literature is first evaluated in a set of 18 clinical cases (10 healthy and 8 diseased), finding reasonable results for stiffness but not for residual active tension. We then investigate the use of non-invasive pressure measures, now available through imaging techniques and limited by unknown or biased offset values. Specifically, three sets of physiologically realistic synthetic data with three levels of diastolic residual active tension (i.e., impaired relaxation capability) are designed to quantify the percentage error in the parameter estimation against the possible pressure offsets within the physiological limits. Maximum errors are quantified as 11 % for the magnitude of stiffness and 22 % for AT, with averaged 0.17 kPa error in pressure measurement offset using the state-of-the-art non-invasive pressure estimation method. The main cause for these errors is the limited temporal resolution of clinical imaging data currently available. These results demonstrate the potential feasibility of the estimation diastolic biomarkers with non-invasive assessment of pressure through medical imaging data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-10-04 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4082656/ /pubmed/24092256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0531-y Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Xi, Jiahe
Shi, Wenzhe
Rueckert, Daniel
Razavi, Reza
Smith, Nicolas P.
Lamata, Pablo
Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
title Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
title_full Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
title_fullStr Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
title_short Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
title_sort understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0531-y
work_keys_str_mv AT xijiahe understandingtheneedofventricularpressurefortheestimationofdiastolicbiomarkers
AT shiwenzhe understandingtheneedofventricularpressurefortheestimationofdiastolicbiomarkers
AT rueckertdaniel understandingtheneedofventricularpressurefortheestimationofdiastolicbiomarkers
AT razavireza understandingtheneedofventricularpressurefortheestimationofdiastolicbiomarkers
AT smithnicolasp understandingtheneedofventricularpressurefortheestimationofdiastolicbiomarkers
AT lamatapablo understandingtheneedofventricularpressurefortheestimationofdiastolicbiomarkers