Cargando…
Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions
BACKGROUND: The EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24974196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-128 |
_version_ | 1782324332668649472 |
---|---|
author | Papp, Renata Borbas, Ilona Dobos, Eva Bredehorst, Maren Jaruseviciene, Lina Vehko, Tuulikki Balogh, Sandor |
author_facet | Papp, Renata Borbas, Ilona Dobos, Eva Bredehorst, Maren Jaruseviciene, Lina Vehko, Tuulikki Balogh, Sandor |
author_sort | Papp, Renata |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness. METHODS: The focus group technique was applied in the study as a qualitative research method for exploration of attitudes regarding the health care system and health service. Discussions were addressing the topics of: general aspects of quality in primary health care; possibilities to receive/provide PHC services based on both parties needs; determinant factors of accessibility to PHC services; patient centeredness. The data sets collected during the focus group discussions were evaluated using the method of thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were 14 focus groups in total: a professional and a patient group in each of the seven partner countries. Findings of the thematic analysis were summarized along the following dimensions: access and equity, appropriateness (coordination, continuity, competency and comprehensiveness) and patient centeredness. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows perceptions and views of patients in interaction with PHC and opinion of professionals working in PHC. It serves as source of criteria with relevance to everyday practice and experience. The criteria mentioned by patients and by health care professionals which were considered determining factors of the quality in primary care were quite similar among the investigated countries. However, the perception and the level of tolerance regarding some of the criteria differed among EUprimecare countries. Among these dissimilar criteria we especially note the gate-keeping role of GPs, the importance of nurses' competency and the acceptance of waiting times. The impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction is obvious; the influence of equity and access to PHC services are more dependent on the equal distribution of settings and doctors in urban and rural area. Foreseen shortage of doctors is expected to have a substantial influence on patient satisfaction in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4083126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40831262014-07-08 Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions Papp, Renata Borbas, Ilona Dobos, Eva Bredehorst, Maren Jaruseviciene, Lina Vehko, Tuulikki Balogh, Sandor BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness. METHODS: The focus group technique was applied in the study as a qualitative research method for exploration of attitudes regarding the health care system and health service. Discussions were addressing the topics of: general aspects of quality in primary health care; possibilities to receive/provide PHC services based on both parties needs; determinant factors of accessibility to PHC services; patient centeredness. The data sets collected during the focus group discussions were evaluated using the method of thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were 14 focus groups in total: a professional and a patient group in each of the seven partner countries. Findings of the thematic analysis were summarized along the following dimensions: access and equity, appropriateness (coordination, continuity, competency and comprehensiveness) and patient centeredness. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows perceptions and views of patients in interaction with PHC and opinion of professionals working in PHC. It serves as source of criteria with relevance to everyday practice and experience. The criteria mentioned by patients and by health care professionals which were considered determining factors of the quality in primary care were quite similar among the investigated countries. However, the perception and the level of tolerance regarding some of the criteria differed among EUprimecare countries. Among these dissimilar criteria we especially note the gate-keeping role of GPs, the importance of nurses' competency and the acceptance of waiting times. The impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction is obvious; the influence of equity and access to PHC services are more dependent on the equal distribution of settings and doctors in urban and rural area. Foreseen shortage of doctors is expected to have a substantial influence on patient satisfaction in the near future. BioMed Central 2014-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4083126/ /pubmed/24974196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-128 Text en Copyright © 2014 Papp et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Papp, Renata Borbas, Ilona Dobos, Eva Bredehorst, Maren Jaruseviciene, Lina Vehko, Tuulikki Balogh, Sandor Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
title | Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
title_full | Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
title_fullStr | Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
title_short | Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
title_sort | perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24974196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papprenata perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions AT borbasilona perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions AT doboseva perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions AT bredehorstmaren perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions AT jarusevicienelina perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions AT vehkotuulikki perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions AT baloghsandor perceptionsofqualityinprimaryhealthcareperspectivesofpatientsandprofessionalsbasedonfocusgroupdiscussions |