Cargando…
Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused?
In Minds, Brains, and Law, Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson argue that current attempts to use neuroscience to inform the theory and practice of law founder because they are built on confused conceptual foundations. Proponents of neurolaw attribute to the brain or to its parts psychological proper...
Autor principal: | Levy, Neil |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25009442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10892-014-9168-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Neurolaw: A brief introduction
por: Petoft, Arian
Publicado: (2015) -
Neuroimaging and Neurolaw: Drawing the Future of Aging
por: Tigano, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Editorial: Neurolaw: The Call for Adjusting Theory Based on Scientific Results
por: Muñoz, José M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Real Neurolaw in the Netherlands: The Role of the Developing Brain in the New Adolescent Criminal Law
por: Schleim, Stephan
Publicado: (2020) -
Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective
por: Tortora, Leda, et al.
Publicado: (2020)