Cargando…
Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
Both bone forearm fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Optimal treatment is dictated not only by fracture characteristics but also patient age. In the pediatric population, acceptable alignment can tolerate greater fracture displacement due to the bone’s ability to remodel with remaining growth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002936 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5325 |
_version_ | 1782324358850543616 |
---|---|
author | Vopat, Matthew L. Kane, Patrick M. Christino, Melissa A. Truntzer, Jeremy McClure, Philip Katarincic, Julia Vopat, Bryan G. |
author_facet | Vopat, Matthew L. Kane, Patrick M. Christino, Melissa A. Truntzer, Jeremy McClure, Philip Katarincic, Julia Vopat, Bryan G. |
author_sort | Vopat, Matthew L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both bone forearm fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Optimal treatment is dictated not only by fracture characteristics but also patient age. In the pediatric population, acceptable alignment can tolerate greater fracture displacement due to the bone’s ability to remodel with remaining growth. Generally, these fractures can be successfully managed with closed reduction and casting, however operative fixation may also be required. The optimal method of fixation has not been clearly established. Currently, the most common operative interventions are open reduction with plate fixation versus closed or open reduction with intramedullary fixation. Plating has advantages of being more familiar to many surgeons, being theoretically superior in the ability to restore radial bow, and providing the possibility of hardware retention. Recently, intramedullary nailing has been gaining popularity due to decreased soft tissue dissection; however, a second operation is needed for hardware removal generally 6 months after the index procedure. Current literature has not established the superiority of one surgical method over the other. The goal of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the treatment of pediatric forearm fractures and provide clinical recommendations for optimal treatment, focusing specifically on children ages 3-10 years old. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4083309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40833092014-07-07 Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children Vopat, Matthew L. Kane, Patrick M. Christino, Melissa A. Truntzer, Jeremy McClure, Philip Katarincic, Julia Vopat, Bryan G. Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review Both bone forearm fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Optimal treatment is dictated not only by fracture characteristics but also patient age. In the pediatric population, acceptable alignment can tolerate greater fracture displacement due to the bone’s ability to remodel with remaining growth. Generally, these fractures can be successfully managed with closed reduction and casting, however operative fixation may also be required. The optimal method of fixation has not been clearly established. Currently, the most common operative interventions are open reduction with plate fixation versus closed or open reduction with intramedullary fixation. Plating has advantages of being more familiar to many surgeons, being theoretically superior in the ability to restore radial bow, and providing the possibility of hardware retention. Recently, intramedullary nailing has been gaining popularity due to decreased soft tissue dissection; however, a second operation is needed for hardware removal generally 6 months after the index procedure. Current literature has not established the superiority of one surgical method over the other. The goal of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the treatment of pediatric forearm fractures and provide clinical recommendations for optimal treatment, focusing specifically on children ages 3-10 years old. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2014-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4083309/ /pubmed/25002936 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5325 Text en ©Copyright M.L. Vopat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Vopat, Matthew L. Kane, Patrick M. Christino, Melissa A. Truntzer, Jeremy McClure, Philip Katarincic, Julia Vopat, Bryan G. Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children |
title | Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children |
title_full | Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children |
title_short | Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children |
title_sort | treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002936 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vopatmatthewl treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren AT kanepatrickm treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren AT christinomelissaa treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren AT truntzerjeremy treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren AT mcclurephilip treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren AT katarincicjulia treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren AT vopatbryang treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren |