Cargando…

Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children

Both bone forearm fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Optimal treatment is dictated not only by fracture characteristics but also patient age. In the pediatric population, acceptable alignment can tolerate greater fracture displacement due to the bone’s ability to remodel with remaining growth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vopat, Matthew L., Kane, Patrick M., Christino, Melissa A., Truntzer, Jeremy, McClure, Philip, Katarincic, Julia, Vopat, Bryan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002936
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5325
_version_ 1782324358850543616
author Vopat, Matthew L.
Kane, Patrick M.
Christino, Melissa A.
Truntzer, Jeremy
McClure, Philip
Katarincic, Julia
Vopat, Bryan G.
author_facet Vopat, Matthew L.
Kane, Patrick M.
Christino, Melissa A.
Truntzer, Jeremy
McClure, Philip
Katarincic, Julia
Vopat, Bryan G.
author_sort Vopat, Matthew L.
collection PubMed
description Both bone forearm fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Optimal treatment is dictated not only by fracture characteristics but also patient age. In the pediatric population, acceptable alignment can tolerate greater fracture displacement due to the bone’s ability to remodel with remaining growth. Generally, these fractures can be successfully managed with closed reduction and casting, however operative fixation may also be required. The optimal method of fixation has not been clearly established. Currently, the most common operative interventions are open reduction with plate fixation versus closed or open reduction with intramedullary fixation. Plating has advantages of being more familiar to many surgeons, being theoretically superior in the ability to restore radial bow, and providing the possibility of hardware retention. Recently, intramedullary nailing has been gaining popularity due to decreased soft tissue dissection; however, a second operation is needed for hardware removal generally 6 months after the index procedure. Current literature has not established the superiority of one surgical method over the other. The goal of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the treatment of pediatric forearm fractures and provide clinical recommendations for optimal treatment, focusing specifically on children ages 3-10 years old.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4083309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40833092014-07-07 Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children Vopat, Matthew L. Kane, Patrick M. Christino, Melissa A. Truntzer, Jeremy McClure, Philip Katarincic, Julia Vopat, Bryan G. Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review Both bone forearm fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Optimal treatment is dictated not only by fracture characteristics but also patient age. In the pediatric population, acceptable alignment can tolerate greater fracture displacement due to the bone’s ability to remodel with remaining growth. Generally, these fractures can be successfully managed with closed reduction and casting, however operative fixation may also be required. The optimal method of fixation has not been clearly established. Currently, the most common operative interventions are open reduction with plate fixation versus closed or open reduction with intramedullary fixation. Plating has advantages of being more familiar to many surgeons, being theoretically superior in the ability to restore radial bow, and providing the possibility of hardware retention. Recently, intramedullary nailing has been gaining popularity due to decreased soft tissue dissection; however, a second operation is needed for hardware removal generally 6 months after the index procedure. Current literature has not established the superiority of one surgical method over the other. The goal of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the treatment of pediatric forearm fractures and provide clinical recommendations for optimal treatment, focusing specifically on children ages 3-10 years old. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2014-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4083309/ /pubmed/25002936 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5325 Text en ©Copyright M.L. Vopat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Vopat, Matthew L.
Kane, Patrick M.
Christino, Melissa A.
Truntzer, Jeremy
McClure, Philip
Katarincic, Julia
Vopat, Bryan G.
Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
title Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
title_full Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
title_fullStr Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
title_short Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children
title_sort treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002936
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5325
work_keys_str_mv AT vopatmatthewl treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren
AT kanepatrickm treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren
AT christinomelissaa treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren
AT truntzerjeremy treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren
AT mcclurephilip treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren
AT katarincicjulia treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren
AT vopatbryang treatmentofdiaphysealforearmfracturesinchildren