Cargando…

The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach

Composite cements have been shown to be biocompatible, bioactive, with good mechanical properties and capability to bind to the bone. Despite these interesting characteristic, in vivo studies on animal models are still incomplete and ultrastructural data are lacking. The acquisition of new ultrastru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dall’Oca, C., Maluta, T., Cavani, F., Morbioli, G.P., Bernardi, P., Sbarbati, A., Degl’Innocenti, D., Magnan, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24998920
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2014.2255
_version_ 1782324361409069056
author Dall’Oca, C.
Maluta, T.
Cavani, F.
Morbioli, G.P.
Bernardi, P.
Sbarbati, A.
Degl’Innocenti, D.
Magnan, B.
author_facet Dall’Oca, C.
Maluta, T.
Cavani, F.
Morbioli, G.P.
Bernardi, P.
Sbarbati, A.
Degl’Innocenti, D.
Magnan, B.
author_sort Dall’Oca, C.
collection PubMed
description Composite cements have been shown to be biocompatible, bioactive, with good mechanical properties and capability to bind to the bone. Despite these interesting characteristic, in vivo studies on animal models are still incomplete and ultrastructural data are lacking. The acquisition of new ultrastructural data is hampered by uncertainties in the methods of preparation of histological samples due to the use of resins that melt methacrylate present in bone cement composition. A new porous acrylic cement composed of polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA) and β-tricalcium-phosphate (p-TCP) was developed and tested on an animal model. The cement was implanted in femurs of 8 New Zealand White rabbits, which were observed for 8 weeks before their sacrifice. Histological samples were prepared with an infiltration process of LR white resin and then the specimens were studied by X-rays, histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As a control, an acrylic standard cement, commonly used in clinical procedures, was chosen. Radiographic ultrastructural and histological exams have allowed finding an excellent biocompatibility of the new porous cement. The high degree of osteointegration was demonstrated by growth of neo-created bone tissue inside the cement sample. Local or systemic toxicity signs were not detected. The present work shows that the proposed procedure for the evaluation of biocompatibility, based on the use of LR white resin allows to make a thorough and objective assessment of the biocompatibility of porous and non-porous bone cements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4083320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40833202014-07-07 The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach Dall’Oca, C. Maluta, T. Cavani, F. Morbioli, G.P. Bernardi, P. Sbarbati, A. Degl’Innocenti, D. Magnan, B. Eur J Histochem Original Paper Composite cements have been shown to be biocompatible, bioactive, with good mechanical properties and capability to bind to the bone. Despite these interesting characteristic, in vivo studies on animal models are still incomplete and ultrastructural data are lacking. The acquisition of new ultrastructural data is hampered by uncertainties in the methods of preparation of histological samples due to the use of resins that melt methacrylate present in bone cement composition. A new porous acrylic cement composed of polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA) and β-tricalcium-phosphate (p-TCP) was developed and tested on an animal model. The cement was implanted in femurs of 8 New Zealand White rabbits, which were observed for 8 weeks before their sacrifice. Histological samples were prepared with an infiltration process of LR white resin and then the specimens were studied by X-rays, histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As a control, an acrylic standard cement, commonly used in clinical procedures, was chosen. Radiographic ultrastructural and histological exams have allowed finding an excellent biocompatibility of the new porous cement. The high degree of osteointegration was demonstrated by growth of neo-created bone tissue inside the cement sample. Local or systemic toxicity signs were not detected. The present work shows that the proposed procedure for the evaluation of biocompatibility, based on the use of LR white resin allows to make a thorough and objective assessment of the biocompatibility of porous and non-porous bone cements. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2014-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4083320/ /pubmed/24998920 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2014.2255 Text en ©Copyright C. Dall’Oca et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dall’Oca, C.
Maluta, T.
Cavani, F.
Morbioli, G.P.
Bernardi, P.
Sbarbati, A.
Degl’Innocenti, D.
Magnan, B.
The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach
title The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach
title_full The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach
title_fullStr The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach
title_short The Biocompatibility of Porous vs Non-Porous Bone Cements: A New Methodological Approach
title_sort biocompatibility of porous vs non-porous bone cements: a new methodological approach
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24998920
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2014.2255
work_keys_str_mv AT dallocac thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT malutat thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT cavanif thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT morbioligp thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT bernardip thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT sbarbatia thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT deglinnocentid thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT magnanb thebiocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT dallocac biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT malutat biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT cavanif biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT morbioligp biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT bernardip biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT sbarbatia biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT deglinnocentid biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach
AT magnanb biocompatibilityofporousvsnonporousbonecementsanewmethodologicalapproach