Cargando…
Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions
Prospection is thinking about possible future states of the world. Commitment to perform a future action—commonly referred to as intention—is a specific type of prospection. This knowledge is relevant when trying to assess whether a stated intention is a lie or the truth. An important observation is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00677 |
_version_ | 1782324369427529728 |
---|---|
author | Knieps, Melanie Granhag, Pär A. Vrij, Aldert |
author_facet | Knieps, Melanie Granhag, Pär A. Vrij, Aldert |
author_sort | Knieps, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prospection is thinking about possible future states of the world. Commitment to perform a future action—commonly referred to as intention—is a specific type of prospection. This knowledge is relevant when trying to assess whether a stated intention is a lie or the truth. An important observation is that thinking of, and committing to, future actions often evoke vivid and detailed mental images. One factor that affects how specific a person experiences these simulations is location-familiarity. The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent location-familiarity moderates how liars and truth tellers describe a mental image in an investigative interview. Liars were instructed to plan a criminal act and truth tellers were instructed to plan a non-criminal act. Before they could carry out these acts, the participants were intercepted and interviewed about the mental images they may have had experienced in this planning phase. Truth tellers told the truth whereas liars used a cover story to mask their criminal intentions. As predicted, the results showed that the truth tellers reported a mental image significantly more often than the liars. If a mental image was reported, the content of the descriptions did not differ between liars and truth tellers. In a post interview questionnaire, the participants rated the vividness (i.e., content and clarity) of their mental images. The ratings revealed that the truth tellers had experienced their mental images more vividly during the planning phase than the liars. In conclusion, this study indicates that both prototypical and specific representations play a role in prospection. Although location-familiarity did not moderate how liars and truth tellers describe their mental images of the future, this study allows some interesting insights into human future thinking. How these findings can be helpful for distinguishing between true and false intentions will be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4083357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40833572014-07-28 Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions Knieps, Melanie Granhag, Pär A. Vrij, Aldert Front Psychol Psychology Prospection is thinking about possible future states of the world. Commitment to perform a future action—commonly referred to as intention—is a specific type of prospection. This knowledge is relevant when trying to assess whether a stated intention is a lie or the truth. An important observation is that thinking of, and committing to, future actions often evoke vivid and detailed mental images. One factor that affects how specific a person experiences these simulations is location-familiarity. The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent location-familiarity moderates how liars and truth tellers describe a mental image in an investigative interview. Liars were instructed to plan a criminal act and truth tellers were instructed to plan a non-criminal act. Before they could carry out these acts, the participants were intercepted and interviewed about the mental images they may have had experienced in this planning phase. Truth tellers told the truth whereas liars used a cover story to mask their criminal intentions. As predicted, the results showed that the truth tellers reported a mental image significantly more often than the liars. If a mental image was reported, the content of the descriptions did not differ between liars and truth tellers. In a post interview questionnaire, the participants rated the vividness (i.e., content and clarity) of their mental images. The ratings revealed that the truth tellers had experienced their mental images more vividly during the planning phase than the liars. In conclusion, this study indicates that both prototypical and specific representations play a role in prospection. Although location-familiarity did not moderate how liars and truth tellers describe their mental images of the future, this study allows some interesting insights into human future thinking. How these findings can be helpful for distinguishing between true and false intentions will be discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4083357/ /pubmed/25071648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00677 Text en Copyright © 2014 Knieps, Granhag and Vrij. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Knieps, Melanie Granhag, Pär A. Vrij, Aldert Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
title | Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
title_full | Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
title_fullStr | Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
title_full_unstemmed | Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
title_short | Been there before? Examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
title_sort | been there before? examining “familiarity” as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kniepsmelanie beentherebeforeexaminingfamiliarityasamoderatorfordiscriminatingbetweentrueandfalseintentions AT granhagpara beentherebeforeexaminingfamiliarityasamoderatorfordiscriminatingbetweentrueandfalseintentions AT vrijaldert beentherebeforeexaminingfamiliarityasamoderatorfordiscriminatingbetweentrueandfalseintentions |