Cargando…
An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification
Many domains would benefit from reliable and efficient systems for automatic protein classification. An area of particular interest in recent studies on automatic protein classification is the exploration of new methods for extracting features from a protein that work well for specific problems. The...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4084589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25028675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/236717 |
_version_ | 1782324555065327616 |
---|---|
author | Nanni, Loris Lumini, Alessandra Brahnam, Sheryl |
author_facet | Nanni, Loris Lumini, Alessandra Brahnam, Sheryl |
author_sort | Nanni, Loris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many domains would benefit from reliable and efficient systems for automatic protein classification. An area of particular interest in recent studies on automatic protein classification is the exploration of new methods for extracting features from a protein that work well for specific problems. These methods, however, are not generalizable and have proven useful in only a few domains. Our goal is to evaluate several feature extraction approaches for representing proteins by testing them across multiple datasets. Different types of protein representations are evaluated: those starting from the position specific scoring matrix of the proteins (PSSM), those derived from the amino-acid sequence, two matrix representations, and features taken from the 3D tertiary structure of the protein. We also test new variants of proteins descriptors. We develop our system experimentally by comparing and combining different descriptors taken from the protein representations. Each descriptor is used to train a separate support vector machine (SVM), and the results are combined by sum rule. Some stand-alone descriptors work well on some datasets but not on others. Through fusion, the different descriptors provide a performance that works well across all tested datasets, in some cases performing better than the state-of-the-art. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4084589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40845892014-07-15 An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification Nanni, Loris Lumini, Alessandra Brahnam, Sheryl ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Many domains would benefit from reliable and efficient systems for automatic protein classification. An area of particular interest in recent studies on automatic protein classification is the exploration of new methods for extracting features from a protein that work well for specific problems. These methods, however, are not generalizable and have proven useful in only a few domains. Our goal is to evaluate several feature extraction approaches for representing proteins by testing them across multiple datasets. Different types of protein representations are evaluated: those starting from the position specific scoring matrix of the proteins (PSSM), those derived from the amino-acid sequence, two matrix representations, and features taken from the 3D tertiary structure of the protein. We also test new variants of proteins descriptors. We develop our system experimentally by comparing and combining different descriptors taken from the protein representations. Each descriptor is used to train a separate support vector machine (SVM), and the results are combined by sum rule. Some stand-alone descriptors work well on some datasets but not on others. Through fusion, the different descriptors provide a performance that works well across all tested datasets, in some cases performing better than the state-of-the-art. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4084589/ /pubmed/25028675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/236717 Text en Copyright © 2014 Loris Nanni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nanni, Loris Lumini, Alessandra Brahnam, Sheryl An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification |
title | An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification |
title_full | An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification |
title_fullStr | An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification |
title_short | An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification |
title_sort | empirical study of different approaches for protein classification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4084589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25028675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/236717 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nanniloris anempiricalstudyofdifferentapproachesforproteinclassification AT luminialessandra anempiricalstudyofdifferentapproachesforproteinclassification AT brahnamsheryl anempiricalstudyofdifferentapproachesforproteinclassification AT nanniloris empiricalstudyofdifferentapproachesforproteinclassification AT luminialessandra empiricalstudyofdifferentapproachesforproteinclassification AT brahnamsheryl empiricalstudyofdifferentapproachesforproteinclassification |