Cargando…

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer

PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafiei, Fereshteh, Tavangar, Maryam Sadat, Ghahramani, Yasamin, Fattah, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006384
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200
_version_ 1782324628655439872
author Shafiei, Fereshteh
Tavangar, Maryam Sadat
Ghahramani, Yasamin
Fattah, Zahra
author_facet Shafiei, Fereshteh
Tavangar, Maryam Sadat
Ghahramani, Yasamin
Fattah, Zahra
author_sort Shafiei, Fereshteh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12). G1 (negative control) was the intact teeth. In Groups 2-8, root canal treatment with mesio-occlusodistal preparation was performed. G2 (positive control) was kept unrestored. The other groups were restored using composite resin as follows: G3, methacrylate-based composite (Z250); G4, methacrylate composite (Z250) with polyethylene fiber; G5 and G6, silorane-based composite (Filtek P90) without and with the fiber, respectively; G7 and G8, methacrylate- and silorane-based composite with nano-ionomer base, respectively. After aging period and thermocycling for 1000 cycles, fracture strength was tested and fracture patterns were inspected. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance for the eight groups (in Newton) were G1: 1200 ± 169(a), G2: 360 ± 93(b), G3: 632 ± 196(c), G4: 692 ± 195(c), G5: 917 ± 159(d), G6: 1013 ± 125(ad), G7: 959 ± 148(d), G8: 947 ± 105(d) (different superscript letters revealed significant difference among groups). Most of the fractures in all the groups were restorable, except Group 3. CONCLUSION: Silorane-based composite revealed significantly higher strength of the restored premolars compared to that of methacrylate one. Fiber insertion demonstrated no additional effect on the strength of both composite restorations; however, it increased the prevalence of restorable fracture of methacrylate-based composite restored teeth. Using nano-ionomer base under methacrylate-based composite had a positive effect on fracture resistance and pattern. Only fiber-reinforced silorane composite restoration resulted in a strength similar to that of the intact teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4085244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40852442014-07-08 Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer Shafiei, Fereshteh Tavangar, Maryam Sadat Ghahramani, Yasamin Fattah, Zahra J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12). G1 (negative control) was the intact teeth. In Groups 2-8, root canal treatment with mesio-occlusodistal preparation was performed. G2 (positive control) was kept unrestored. The other groups were restored using composite resin as follows: G3, methacrylate-based composite (Z250); G4, methacrylate composite (Z250) with polyethylene fiber; G5 and G6, silorane-based composite (Filtek P90) without and with the fiber, respectively; G7 and G8, methacrylate- and silorane-based composite with nano-ionomer base, respectively. After aging period and thermocycling for 1000 cycles, fracture strength was tested and fracture patterns were inspected. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance for the eight groups (in Newton) were G1: 1200 ± 169(a), G2: 360 ± 93(b), G3: 632 ± 196(c), G4: 692 ± 195(c), G5: 917 ± 159(d), G6: 1013 ± 125(ad), G7: 959 ± 148(d), G8: 947 ± 105(d) (different superscript letters revealed significant difference among groups). Most of the fractures in all the groups were restorable, except Group 3. CONCLUSION: Silorane-based composite revealed significantly higher strength of the restored premolars compared to that of methacrylate one. Fiber insertion demonstrated no additional effect on the strength of both composite restorations; however, it increased the prevalence of restorable fracture of methacrylate-based composite restored teeth. Using nano-ionomer base under methacrylate-based composite had a positive effect on fracture resistance and pattern. Only fiber-reinforced silorane composite restoration resulted in a strength similar to that of the intact teeth. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2014-06 2014-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4085244/ /pubmed/25006384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200 Text en © 2014 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shafiei, Fereshteh
Tavangar, Maryam Sadat
Ghahramani, Yasamin
Fattah, Zahra
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
title Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
title_full Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
title_fullStr Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
title_full_unstemmed Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
title_short Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
title_sort fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006384
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200
work_keys_str_mv AT shafieifereshteh fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer
AT tavangarmaryamsadat fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer
AT ghahramaniyasamin fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer
AT fattahzahra fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer