Cargando…
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eig...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200 |
_version_ | 1782324628655439872 |
---|---|
author | Shafiei, Fereshteh Tavangar, Maryam Sadat Ghahramani, Yasamin Fattah, Zahra |
author_facet | Shafiei, Fereshteh Tavangar, Maryam Sadat Ghahramani, Yasamin Fattah, Zahra |
author_sort | Shafiei, Fereshteh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12). G1 (negative control) was the intact teeth. In Groups 2-8, root canal treatment with mesio-occlusodistal preparation was performed. G2 (positive control) was kept unrestored. The other groups were restored using composite resin as follows: G3, methacrylate-based composite (Z250); G4, methacrylate composite (Z250) with polyethylene fiber; G5 and G6, silorane-based composite (Filtek P90) without and with the fiber, respectively; G7 and G8, methacrylate- and silorane-based composite with nano-ionomer base, respectively. After aging period and thermocycling for 1000 cycles, fracture strength was tested and fracture patterns were inspected. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance for the eight groups (in Newton) were G1: 1200 ± 169(a), G2: 360 ± 93(b), G3: 632 ± 196(c), G4: 692 ± 195(c), G5: 917 ± 159(d), G6: 1013 ± 125(ad), G7: 959 ± 148(d), G8: 947 ± 105(d) (different superscript letters revealed significant difference among groups). Most of the fractures in all the groups were restorable, except Group 3. CONCLUSION: Silorane-based composite revealed significantly higher strength of the restored premolars compared to that of methacrylate one. Fiber insertion demonstrated no additional effect on the strength of both composite restorations; however, it increased the prevalence of restorable fracture of methacrylate-based composite restored teeth. Using nano-ionomer base under methacrylate-based composite had a positive effect on fracture resistance and pattern. Only fiber-reinforced silorane composite restoration resulted in a strength similar to that of the intact teeth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4085244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40852442014-07-08 Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer Shafiei, Fereshteh Tavangar, Maryam Sadat Ghahramani, Yasamin Fattah, Zahra J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12). G1 (negative control) was the intact teeth. In Groups 2-8, root canal treatment with mesio-occlusodistal preparation was performed. G2 (positive control) was kept unrestored. The other groups were restored using composite resin as follows: G3, methacrylate-based composite (Z250); G4, methacrylate composite (Z250) with polyethylene fiber; G5 and G6, silorane-based composite (Filtek P90) without and with the fiber, respectively; G7 and G8, methacrylate- and silorane-based composite with nano-ionomer base, respectively. After aging period and thermocycling for 1000 cycles, fracture strength was tested and fracture patterns were inspected. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance for the eight groups (in Newton) were G1: 1200 ± 169(a), G2: 360 ± 93(b), G3: 632 ± 196(c), G4: 692 ± 195(c), G5: 917 ± 159(d), G6: 1013 ± 125(ad), G7: 959 ± 148(d), G8: 947 ± 105(d) (different superscript letters revealed significant difference among groups). Most of the fractures in all the groups were restorable, except Group 3. CONCLUSION: Silorane-based composite revealed significantly higher strength of the restored premolars compared to that of methacrylate one. Fiber insertion demonstrated no additional effect on the strength of both composite restorations; however, it increased the prevalence of restorable fracture of methacrylate-based composite restored teeth. Using nano-ionomer base under methacrylate-based composite had a positive effect on fracture resistance and pattern. Only fiber-reinforced silorane composite restoration resulted in a strength similar to that of the intact teeth. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2014-06 2014-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4085244/ /pubmed/25006384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200 Text en © 2014 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shafiei, Fereshteh Tavangar, Maryam Sadat Ghahramani, Yasamin Fattah, Zahra Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
title | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
title_full | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
title_fullStr | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
title_full_unstemmed | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
title_short | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
title_sort | fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shafieifereshteh fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer AT tavangarmaryamsadat fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer AT ghahramaniyasamin fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer AT fattahzahra fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsrestoredbysiloranebasedcompositewithorwithoutfiberornanoionomer |