Cargando…

EC(50) and EC(95) of remifentanil to prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in children

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of rocuronium induces intense pain in most patients (60-100%). This could be harmful during anesthesia induction because of the unintended reflex movement of an unconscious patient in response to the pain. Previous studies have reported that remifentanil effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Hye Jin, Kang, Hyoseok, Kim, Eu-Gene, Choi, Juyoun, Seo, Jeong Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006366
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.6.433
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of rocuronium induces intense pain in most patients (60-100%). This could be harmful during anesthesia induction because of the unintended reflex movement of an unconscious patient in response to the pain. Previous studies have reported that remifentanil effectively reduces rocuronium-induced pain and withdrawal movements. This study was designed to evaluate the EC(50) and EC(95) of remifentanil to prevent withdrawal movements in children. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 171 pediatric patients scheduled for general anesthesia in this study. Remifentanil was administrated by target-controlled infusion. Effect-site target concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 ng/ml. At each concentration, experiments were repeated in 10-20 patients. Propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg were administrated after equilibration of plasma and effect-site target remifentanil concentration. The withdrawal movements were graded on a 4-point scale. The EC(50) and EC(95) of remifentanil to prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements were determined by using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The logistic regression model showed that the probability of preventing rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement was as follows: exp (-3.49 + 2.07 × remifentanil concentration) / (1 + exp [-3.49 + 2.07 × remifentanil concentration]). EC(50) and EC(95) were 1.69 ng/ml (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.42-1.87) and 3.11 ng/ml (95% CIs, 2.79-3.72), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of remifentanil at an effect-site target concentration of 3.1 ng/ml could effectively prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements.