Cargando…
EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto de Medicina Tropical
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000100004 |
_version_ | 1782324714116481024 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Caio Fernando Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva Reiter, Keli Cristine Rieger, Alexandre D'azevedo, Pedro Alves |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Caio Fernando Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva Reiter, Keli Cristine Rieger, Alexandre D'azevedo, Pedro Alves |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Caio Fernando |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thick cell wall that is difficult to lyse. This study was designed to compare the quality and the amount of CoNS DNA, extracted by four different techniques: two in-house protocols and two commercial kits. DNA amount and quality determination was performed through spectrophotometry. The extracted DNA was also analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and by PCR. 267 isolates of CoNS were used in this study. The column method and thermal lyses showed better results with regard to DNA quality (mean ratio of A260/280 = 1.95) and average concentration of DNA ([Image: see text]), respectively. All four methods tested provided appropriate DNA for PCR amplification, but with different yields. DNA quality is important since it allows the application of a large number of molecular biology techniques, and also it's storage for a longer period of time. In this sense the extraction method based on an extraction column presented the best results for CoNS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4085835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Instituto de Medicina Tropical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40858352014-07-16 EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES de Oliveira, Caio Fernando Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva Reiter, Keli Cristine Rieger, Alexandre D'azevedo, Pedro Alves Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Microbiology Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thick cell wall that is difficult to lyse. This study was designed to compare the quality and the amount of CoNS DNA, extracted by four different techniques: two in-house protocols and two commercial kits. DNA amount and quality determination was performed through spectrophotometry. The extracted DNA was also analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and by PCR. 267 isolates of CoNS were used in this study. The column method and thermal lyses showed better results with regard to DNA quality (mean ratio of A260/280 = 1.95) and average concentration of DNA ([Image: see text]), respectively. All four methods tested provided appropriate DNA for PCR amplification, but with different yields. DNA quality is important since it allows the application of a large number of molecular biology techniques, and also it's storage for a longer period of time. In this sense the extraction method based on an extraction column presented the best results for CoNS. Instituto de Medicina Tropical 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4085835/ /pubmed/24553605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000100004 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology de Oliveira, Caio Fernando Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva Reiter, Keli Cristine Rieger, Alexandre D'azevedo, Pedro Alves EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES |
title | EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN
COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES |
title_full | EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN
COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES |
title_fullStr | EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN
COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES |
title_full_unstemmed | EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN
COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES |
title_short | EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN
COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES |
title_sort | evaluation of four different dna extraction methods in
coagulase-negative staphylococci clinical isolates |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000100004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiracaiofernando evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates AT paimthiagogalvaodasilva evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates AT reiterkelicristine evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates AT riegeralexandre evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates AT dazevedopedroalves evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates |