Cargando…

EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES

Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Caio Fernando, Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva, Reiter, Keli Cristine, Rieger, Alexandre, D'azevedo, Pedro Alves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Medicina Tropical 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000100004
_version_ 1782324714116481024
author de Oliveira, Caio Fernando
Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva
Reiter, Keli Cristine
Rieger, Alexandre
D'azevedo, Pedro Alves
author_facet de Oliveira, Caio Fernando
Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva
Reiter, Keli Cristine
Rieger, Alexandre
D'azevedo, Pedro Alves
author_sort de Oliveira, Caio Fernando
collection PubMed
description Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thick cell wall that is difficult to lyse. This study was designed to compare the quality and the amount of CoNS DNA, extracted by four different techniques: two in-house protocols and two commercial kits. DNA amount and quality determination was performed through spectrophotometry. The extracted DNA was also analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and by PCR. 267 isolates of CoNS were used in this study. The column method and thermal lyses showed better results with regard to DNA quality (mean ratio of A260/280 = 1.95) and average concentration of DNA ([Image: see text]), respectively. All four methods tested provided appropriate DNA for PCR amplification, but with different yields. DNA quality is important since it allows the application of a large number of molecular biology techniques, and also it's storage for a longer period of time. In this sense the extraction method based on an extraction column presented the best results for CoNS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4085835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Instituto de Medicina Tropical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40858352014-07-16 EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES de Oliveira, Caio Fernando Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva Reiter, Keli Cristine Rieger, Alexandre D'azevedo, Pedro Alves Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Microbiology Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thick cell wall that is difficult to lyse. This study was designed to compare the quality and the amount of CoNS DNA, extracted by four different techniques: two in-house protocols and two commercial kits. DNA amount and quality determination was performed through spectrophotometry. The extracted DNA was also analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and by PCR. 267 isolates of CoNS were used in this study. The column method and thermal lyses showed better results with regard to DNA quality (mean ratio of A260/280 = 1.95) and average concentration of DNA ([Image: see text]), respectively. All four methods tested provided appropriate DNA for PCR amplification, but with different yields. DNA quality is important since it allows the application of a large number of molecular biology techniques, and also it's storage for a longer period of time. In this sense the extraction method based on an extraction column presented the best results for CoNS. Instituto de Medicina Tropical 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4085835/ /pubmed/24553605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000100004 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Microbiology
de Oliveira, Caio Fernando
Paim, Thiago Galvão da Silva
Reiter, Keli Cristine
Rieger, Alexandre
D'azevedo, Pedro Alves
EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
title EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
title_full EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
title_short EVALUATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT DNA EXTRACTION METHODS IN COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI CLINICAL ISOLATES
title_sort evaluation of four different dna extraction methods in coagulase-negative staphylococci clinical isolates
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4085835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000100004
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiracaiofernando evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates
AT paimthiagogalvaodasilva evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates
AT reiterkelicristine evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates
AT riegeralexandre evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates
AT dazevedopedroalves evaluationoffourdifferentdnaextractionmethodsincoagulasenegativestaphylococciclinicalisolates