Cargando…

Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique

BACKGROUND: Air-borne bacteria in the operating room (OR) may contaminate the surgical wound, either by direct sedimentation from the air or indirectly, by contaminated sterile instruments. Reduced air contamination can be achieved with an efficient ventilation system. The current study assesses the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadrizadeh, Sasan, Tammelin, Ann, Nielsen, Peter V, Holmberg, Sture
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-27
_version_ 1782324789578301440
author Sadrizadeh, Sasan
Tammelin, Ann
Nielsen, Peter V
Holmberg, Sture
author_facet Sadrizadeh, Sasan
Tammelin, Ann
Nielsen, Peter V
Holmberg, Sture
author_sort Sadrizadeh, Sasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Air-borne bacteria in the operating room (OR) may contaminate the surgical wound, either by direct sedimentation from the air or indirectly, by contaminated sterile instruments. Reduced air contamination can be achieved with an efficient ventilation system. The current study assesses the additive effect of a mobile laminar airflow (MLAF) unit on the microbiological air quality in an OR supplied with turbulent-mixing air ventilation. METHODS: A recently designed OR in NKS (Nya Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden) was the physical model for this study. Simulation was made with MLAF units adjacent to the operating table and the instrument tables, in addition to conventional turbulent-mixing ventilation. The evaluation used numerical calculation by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Sedimentation rates (CFU/m(2)/h) were calculated above the operating table and two instrument tables, and in the periphery of the OR. Bacterial air contamination (CFU/m(3)) was simulated above the surgical and instrument tables with and without the MLAF unit. RESULTS: The counts of airborne and sedimenting, bacteria-carrying particles downstream of the surgical team were reduced to an acceptable level for orthopedic/implant surgery when the MLAF units were added to conventional OR ventilation. No significant differences in mean sedimentation rates were found in the periphery of the OR. CONCLUSIONS: The MLAF screen unit can be a suitable option when the main OR ventilation system is unable to reduce the level of microbial contamination to an acceptable level for orthopedic implant surgery. However, MLAF effect is limited to an area within 1 m from the screen. Increasing air velocity from the MLAF above 0.4 m/s does not increase the impact area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40862642014-07-09 Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique Sadrizadeh, Sasan Tammelin, Ann Nielsen, Peter V Holmberg, Sture Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Air-borne bacteria in the operating room (OR) may contaminate the surgical wound, either by direct sedimentation from the air or indirectly, by contaminated sterile instruments. Reduced air contamination can be achieved with an efficient ventilation system. The current study assesses the additive effect of a mobile laminar airflow (MLAF) unit on the microbiological air quality in an OR supplied with turbulent-mixing air ventilation. METHODS: A recently designed OR in NKS (Nya Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden) was the physical model for this study. Simulation was made with MLAF units adjacent to the operating table and the instrument tables, in addition to conventional turbulent-mixing ventilation. The evaluation used numerical calculation by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Sedimentation rates (CFU/m(2)/h) were calculated above the operating table and two instrument tables, and in the periphery of the OR. Bacterial air contamination (CFU/m(3)) was simulated above the surgical and instrument tables with and without the MLAF unit. RESULTS: The counts of airborne and sedimenting, bacteria-carrying particles downstream of the surgical team were reduced to an acceptable level for orthopedic/implant surgery when the MLAF units were added to conventional OR ventilation. No significant differences in mean sedimentation rates were found in the periphery of the OR. CONCLUSIONS: The MLAF screen unit can be a suitable option when the main OR ventilation system is unable to reduce the level of microbial contamination to an acceptable level for orthopedic implant surgery. However, MLAF effect is limited to an area within 1 m from the screen. Increasing air velocity from the MLAF above 0.4 m/s does not increase the impact area. BioMed Central 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4086264/ /pubmed/25006349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-27 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sadrizadeh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sadrizadeh, Sasan
Tammelin, Ann
Nielsen, Peter V
Holmberg, Sture
Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
title Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
title_full Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
title_fullStr Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
title_full_unstemmed Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
title_short Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
title_sort does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? a numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-27
work_keys_str_mv AT sadrizadehsasan doesamobilelaminarairflowscreenreducebacterialcontaminationintheoperatingroomanumericalstudyusingcomputationalfluiddynamicstechnique
AT tammelinann doesamobilelaminarairflowscreenreducebacterialcontaminationintheoperatingroomanumericalstudyusingcomputationalfluiddynamicstechnique
AT nielsenpeterv doesamobilelaminarairflowscreenreducebacterialcontaminationintheoperatingroomanumericalstudyusingcomputationalfluiddynamicstechnique
AT holmbergsture doesamobilelaminarairflowscreenreducebacterialcontaminationintheoperatingroomanumericalstudyusingcomputationalfluiddynamicstechnique