Cargando…

Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The Kingdon model, based on the convergence of three streams (problem, policy, and politics) and the opening of a policy window, analyses the process by which a health issue is placed on the political agenda. We used this model to document the political agenda-setting process of the newb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, Bénédicte, Lagasse, Raphaël, Levêque, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24986647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-32
_version_ 1782324793870123008
author Vos, Bénédicte
Lagasse, Raphaël
Levêque, Alain
author_facet Vos, Bénédicte
Lagasse, Raphaël
Levêque, Alain
author_sort Vos, Bénédicte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Kingdon model, based on the convergence of three streams (problem, policy, and politics) and the opening of a policy window, analyses the process by which a health issue is placed on the political agenda. We used this model to document the political agenda-setting process of the newborn hearing screening programme in Belgium. METHODS: A qualitative study based on a document review and on semi-directed interviews was carried out. The interviews were conducted with nine people who had played a role in putting the issue in question on the political agenda, and the documents reviewed included scientific literature and internal reports and publications from the newborn hearing screening programme. The thematic analysis of the data collected was carried out on the basis of the Kingdon model’s three streams. RESULTS: The political agenda-setting of this screening programme was based on many factors. The problem stream included factors external to the context under study, such as the technological developments and the contribution of the scientific literature which led to the recommendation to provide newborn hearing screening. The two other streams (policy and politics) covered factors internal to the Belgian context. The fact that it was locally feasible with financial support, the network of doctors convinced of the need for newborn hearing screening, the drafting of various proposals, and the search for financing were all part of the policy stream. The Belgian political context and the policy opportunities concerning preventive medicine were identified as significant factors in the third stream. When these three streams converged, a policy window opened, allowing newborn hearing screening onto the political agenda and enabling the policy decision for its introduction. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of applying the Kingdon model in our approach was the ability to demonstrate the political agenda-setting process, using the three streams. This made it possible to identify the many factors involved in the process. However, the roles of the stakeholders and of the context were somewhat inexplicit in this model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40862842014-07-09 Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study Vos, Bénédicte Lagasse, Raphaël Levêque, Alain Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The Kingdon model, based on the convergence of three streams (problem, policy, and politics) and the opening of a policy window, analyses the process by which a health issue is placed on the political agenda. We used this model to document the political agenda-setting process of the newborn hearing screening programme in Belgium. METHODS: A qualitative study based on a document review and on semi-directed interviews was carried out. The interviews were conducted with nine people who had played a role in putting the issue in question on the political agenda, and the documents reviewed included scientific literature and internal reports and publications from the newborn hearing screening programme. The thematic analysis of the data collected was carried out on the basis of the Kingdon model’s three streams. RESULTS: The political agenda-setting of this screening programme was based on many factors. The problem stream included factors external to the context under study, such as the technological developments and the contribution of the scientific literature which led to the recommendation to provide newborn hearing screening. The two other streams (policy and politics) covered factors internal to the Belgian context. The fact that it was locally feasible with financial support, the network of doctors convinced of the need for newborn hearing screening, the drafting of various proposals, and the search for financing were all part of the policy stream. The Belgian political context and the policy opportunities concerning preventive medicine were identified as significant factors in the third stream. When these three streams converged, a policy window opened, allowing newborn hearing screening onto the political agenda and enabling the policy decision for its introduction. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of applying the Kingdon model in our approach was the ability to demonstrate the political agenda-setting process, using the three streams. This made it possible to identify the many factors involved in the process. However, the roles of the stakeholders and of the context were somewhat inexplicit in this model. BioMed Central 2014-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4086284/ /pubmed/24986647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-32 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vos, Bénédicte
Lagasse, Raphaël
Levêque, Alain
Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
title Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
title_full Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
title_short Putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in Belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
title_sort putting newborn hearing screening on the political agenda in belgium: local initiatives toward a community programme – a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24986647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-32
work_keys_str_mv AT vosbenedicte puttingnewbornhearingscreeningonthepoliticalagendainbelgiumlocalinitiativestowardacommunityprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT lagasseraphael puttingnewbornhearingscreeningonthepoliticalagendainbelgiumlocalinitiativestowardacommunityprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT levequealain puttingnewbornhearingscreeningonthepoliticalagendainbelgiumlocalinitiativestowardacommunityprogrammeaqualitativestudy