Cargando…

Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents

BACKGROUND: Deficient response inhibition in situations involving a trade-off between response execution and response stopping is a hallmark of attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD). There are two key components of response inhibition; reactive inhibition where one attempts to cancel an ongo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhaijiwala, Mehereen, Chevrier, Andre, Schachar, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.244
_version_ 1782324802603712512
author Bhaijiwala, Mehereen
Chevrier, Andre
Schachar, Russell
author_facet Bhaijiwala, Mehereen
Chevrier, Andre
Schachar, Russell
author_sort Bhaijiwala, Mehereen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deficient response inhibition in situations involving a trade-off between response execution and response stopping is a hallmark of attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD). There are two key components of response inhibition; reactive inhibition where one attempts to cancel an ongoing response and prospective inhibition is when one withholds a response pending a signal to stop. Prospective inhibition comes into play prior to the presentation of the stop signal and reactive inhibition follows the presentation of a signal to stop a particular action. The aim of this study is to investigate the neural activity evoked by prospective and reactive inhibition in adolescents with and without ADHD. METHODS: Twelve adolescents with ADHD and 12 age-matched healthy controls (age range 9–18) were imaged while performing the stop signal task (SST). RESULTS: Reactive inhibition activated right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in both groups. ADHD subjects activated IFG bilaterally. In controls, prospective inhibition invoked preactivation of the same part of right IFG that activated during reactive inhibition. In ADHD subjects, prospective inhibition was associated with deactivation in this region. Controls also deactivated the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) during prospective inhibition, whereas ADHD subjects activated the same area. DISCUSSION: This pattern of activity changes in the same structures, but in opposite directions, was also evident across all phases of the task in various task-specific areas like the superior and middle temporal gyrus and other frontal areas. CONCLUSION: Differences between ADHD and control participants in task-specific and default mode structures (IFG and MPFC) were evident during prospective, but not during reactive inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40863662014-07-08 Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents Bhaijiwala, Mehereen Chevrier, Andre Schachar, Russell Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: Deficient response inhibition in situations involving a trade-off between response execution and response stopping is a hallmark of attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD). There are two key components of response inhibition; reactive inhibition where one attempts to cancel an ongoing response and prospective inhibition is when one withholds a response pending a signal to stop. Prospective inhibition comes into play prior to the presentation of the stop signal and reactive inhibition follows the presentation of a signal to stop a particular action. The aim of this study is to investigate the neural activity evoked by prospective and reactive inhibition in adolescents with and without ADHD. METHODS: Twelve adolescents with ADHD and 12 age-matched healthy controls (age range 9–18) were imaged while performing the stop signal task (SST). RESULTS: Reactive inhibition activated right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in both groups. ADHD subjects activated IFG bilaterally. In controls, prospective inhibition invoked preactivation of the same part of right IFG that activated during reactive inhibition. In ADHD subjects, prospective inhibition was associated with deactivation in this region. Controls also deactivated the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) during prospective inhibition, whereas ADHD subjects activated the same area. DISCUSSION: This pattern of activity changes in the same structures, but in opposite directions, was also evident across all phases of the task in various task-specific areas like the superior and middle temporal gyrus and other frontal areas. CONCLUSION: Differences between ADHD and control participants in task-specific and default mode structures (IFG and MPFC) were evident during prospective, but not during reactive inhibition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-09 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4086366/ /pubmed/25328838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.244 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bhaijiwala, Mehereen
Chevrier, Andre
Schachar, Russell
Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents
title Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents
title_full Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents
title_fullStr Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents
title_short Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents
title_sort withholding and canceling a response in adhd adolescents
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.244
work_keys_str_mv AT bhaijiwalamehereen withholdingandcancelingaresponseinadhdadolescents
AT chevrierandre withholdingandcancelingaresponseinadhdadolescents
AT schacharrussell withholdingandcancelingaresponseinadhdadolescents