Cargando…

To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study

This study evaluated the ability of different adhesive materials in reducing the microleakage in class V amalgam restorations. Standardized class V cavities were prepared on the facial surface of 56 noncarious human premolars, they were then randomly divided into control and experimental groups base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bembi, Sumit, Bembi Narula, Nitika, Sood, Amit, Gambhir, Amarjeet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206200
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1197
_version_ 1782324826641268736
author Bembi, Sumit
Bembi Narula, Nitika
Sood, Amit
Gambhir, Amarjeet
author_facet Bembi, Sumit
Bembi Narula, Nitika
Sood, Amit
Gambhir, Amarjeet
author_sort Bembi, Sumit
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the ability of different adhesive materials in reducing the microleakage in class V amalgam restorations. Standardized class V cavities were prepared on the facial surface of 56 noncarious human premolars, they were then randomly divided into control and experimental groups based on adhesives used. Group I was the control group with copal varnish, group II had Panavia F 2.0, group III contained Vitrebond Plus and group IV had RelyX ARC as adhesives. Amalgam was hand condensed into each preparation after application of adhesive material. Specimens were thermocycled, stained and sectioned. Microleakage was graded using a stereomicroscope. Less leakage was observed in all experimental groups compared to control group (p < 0.01) on nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney test observed leakage was more extensive at the gingival margins (p < 0.01) in all restorations than at occlusal margins. Group III showed no leakage which was significantly different from other groups (p < 0.05). Hence, this study concluded that application of intermediate adhesive material before condensation of amalgam can act as an effective barrier for microleakage. How to cite this article: Bembi S, Bembi NN, Sood A, Gambhir A. To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6(2):95-99.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40865882014-09-09 To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study Bembi, Sumit Bembi Narula, Nitika Sood, Amit Gambhir, Amarjeet Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article This study evaluated the ability of different adhesive materials in reducing the microleakage in class V amalgam restorations. Standardized class V cavities were prepared on the facial surface of 56 noncarious human premolars, they were then randomly divided into control and experimental groups based on adhesives used. Group I was the control group with copal varnish, group II had Panavia F 2.0, group III contained Vitrebond Plus and group IV had RelyX ARC as adhesives. Amalgam was hand condensed into each preparation after application of adhesive material. Specimens were thermocycled, stained and sectioned. Microleakage was graded using a stereomicroscope. Less leakage was observed in all experimental groups compared to control group (p < 0.01) on nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney test observed leakage was more extensive at the gingival margins (p < 0.01) in all restorations than at occlusal margins. Group III showed no leakage which was significantly different from other groups (p < 0.05). Hence, this study concluded that application of intermediate adhesive material before condensation of amalgam can act as an effective barrier for microleakage. How to cite this article: Bembi S, Bembi NN, Sood A, Gambhir A. To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6(2):95-99. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2013 2013-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4086588/ /pubmed/25206200 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1197 Text en Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Bembi, Sumit
Bembi Narula, Nitika
Sood, Amit
Gambhir, Amarjeet
To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study
title To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study
title_full To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study
title_short To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study
title_sort to evaluate the effect of different adhesive materials on the microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206200
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1197
work_keys_str_mv AT bembisumit toevaluatetheeffectofdifferentadhesivematerialsonthemicroleakageofbondedamalgamrestorationsaninvitrostudy
AT bembinarulanitika toevaluatetheeffectofdifferentadhesivematerialsonthemicroleakageofbondedamalgamrestorationsaninvitrostudy
AT soodamit toevaluatetheeffectofdifferentadhesivematerialsonthemicroleakageofbondedamalgamrestorationsaninvitrostudy
AT gambhiramarjeet toevaluatetheeffectofdifferentadhesivematerialsonthemicroleakageofbondedamalgamrestorationsaninvitrostudy