Cargando…

Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method

BACKGROUND: The significant growth in the volume of electronic biomedical data in recent decades has pointed to the need for approximate string matching algorithms that can expedite tasks such as named entity recognition, duplicate detection, terminology integration, and spelling correction. The tas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudniy, Alex, Song, Min, Geller, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-187
_version_ 1782324838890733568
author Rudniy, Alex
Song, Min
Geller, James
author_facet Rudniy, Alex
Song, Min
Geller, James
author_sort Rudniy, Alex
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The significant growth in the volume of electronic biomedical data in recent decades has pointed to the need for approximate string matching algorithms that can expedite tasks such as named entity recognition, duplicate detection, terminology integration, and spelling correction. The task of source integration in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) requires considerable expert effort despite the presence of various computational tools. This problem warrants the search for a new method for approximate string matching and its UMLS-based evaluation. RESULTS: This paper introduces the Longest Approximately Common Prefix (LACP) method as an algorithm for approximate string matching that runs in linear time. We compare the LACP method for performance, precision and speed to nine other well-known string matching algorithms. As test data, we use two multiple-source samples from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and two SNOMED Clinical Terms-based samples. In addition, we present a spell checker based on the LACP method. CONCLUSIONS: The Longest Approximately Common Prefix method completes its string similarity evaluations in less time than all nine string similarity methods used for comparison. The Longest Approximately Common Prefix outperforms these nine approximate string matching methods in its Maximum F(1) measure when evaluated on three out of the four datasets, and in its average precision on two of the four datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40866982014-07-24 Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method Rudniy, Alex Song, Min Geller, James BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The significant growth in the volume of electronic biomedical data in recent decades has pointed to the need for approximate string matching algorithms that can expedite tasks such as named entity recognition, duplicate detection, terminology integration, and spelling correction. The task of source integration in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) requires considerable expert effort despite the presence of various computational tools. This problem warrants the search for a new method for approximate string matching and its UMLS-based evaluation. RESULTS: This paper introduces the Longest Approximately Common Prefix (LACP) method as an algorithm for approximate string matching that runs in linear time. We compare the LACP method for performance, precision and speed to nine other well-known string matching algorithms. As test data, we use two multiple-source samples from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and two SNOMED Clinical Terms-based samples. In addition, we present a spell checker based on the LACP method. CONCLUSIONS: The Longest Approximately Common Prefix method completes its string similarity evaluations in less time than all nine string similarity methods used for comparison. The Longest Approximately Common Prefix outperforms these nine approximate string matching methods in its Maximum F(1) measure when evaluated on three out of the four datasets, and in its average precision on two of the four datasets. BioMed Central 2014-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4086698/ /pubmed/24928653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-187 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rudniy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Rudniy, Alex
Song, Min
Geller, James
Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
title Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
title_full Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
title_fullStr Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
title_full_unstemmed Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
title_short Mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
title_sort mapping biological entities using the longest approximately common prefix method
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-187
work_keys_str_mv AT rudniyalex mappingbiologicalentitiesusingthelongestapproximatelycommonprefixmethod
AT songmin mappingbiologicalentitiesusingthelongestapproximatelycommonprefixmethod
AT gellerjames mappingbiologicalentitiesusingthelongestapproximatelycommonprefixmethod