Cargando…
Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols
George Peat and colleagues review and discuss current approaches to transparency and published debates and concerns about efforts to standardize prognosis research practice, and make five recommendations. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Autores principales: | Peat, George, Riley, Richard D., Croft, Peter, Morley, Katherine I., Kyzas, Panayiotis A., Moons, Karel G. M., Perel, Pablo, Steyerberg, Ewout W., Schroter, Sara, Altman, Douglas G., Hemingway, Harry |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research
por: Riley, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
por: Steyerberg, Ewout W., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling Studies: Guidance on Their Use
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist
por: Moons, Karel G. M., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement
por: Stevens, Gretchen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)